Songbird Singing A New Tune

By Georges Auberger Georges Auberger Permalink

guitarbird-clean.png

As many of you know we’re hard at work on NOFX and the release is looking really good – lots of cool improvements, including video playback. Some of you have noticed that the Linux version has fallen behind, leading to some heated, but healthy debate internally about how to prioritize the development hopper.

After careful consideration, we’ve come to the painful conclusion that we should discontinue support for the Linux version of Songbird. Some of you may wonder how a company with deep roots in Open Source could drop Linux and we want you to know it isn’t without heartache.
 We have a small engineering team here at Songbird, and, more than ever, must stay very focused on a narrow set of priorities. Trying to deliver a raft of new features around all media types, and across a growing list of devices, we had to make some tough choices.

While our Linux users are some of the most passionate, do some killer development, and always provide tremendous input as to whether we’re on the right path or not, we simply can’t continue to support a Linux version as we have in the past.

And, like you, we can’t stand to see our Linux product be anything less than outstanding. Unfortunately, we can’t make that happen right now. Trade-offs are hard, and this is one of the most painful decisions in the history of the company.

We remain loyal to Linux and the ideology it represents, so we will maintain a version of the software for use by our Songbird engineers who develop on the Linux platform. We’ll make that version available to the community. We will keep Linux build bots and host the Linux builds on the developer wiki. That said, those builds will not be tested and may not pick up new features developed by Songbird’s team.

When we roll out NOFX for Windows and Mac at the end of the month, you’ll see video support – import, library management and full screen playback. We are also working on full compatibility with Windows 7 as well as support for a range of new handsets.

UPDATED 4/5/2010 @ 2:22 pm PST

To those who voiced their disappointment and retained a civil tone, we
empathize with you. We appreciate all of the passion from the community, we again want to re-iterate that this was a very tough decision for us. We want to clarify a couple of points:

We also want to share some facts that may bring additional perspective about our decision.

Windows Mac Intel Linux 32 Linux 64 Others
Songbird Active Users (1) 78.2% 10.8% 7.7% 3.2% 0.1%
Windows Mac Linux Others
Bug Reporters (2) 77% 14% 9% -
Addons Contributors (3) 74% 17% 9% -
Translation Contributors (4) 72% 3% 25% -
Visits to getsongbird.com (5) 73% 11% 15% 1%
OS usage share (6) 91.3% 5.9% 1% 1.8%

(1) Measured by application usage on at least 3 distinct days within 30-day period
(2) Measured by OS user agent used by community reporting a bug in last 30 days
(3) Measured by OS user agent used when add-on was submitted to addons.songbirdnest.com in last 30 days
(4) Measured by OS user agent used when translation was submitted to translate.songbirdnest.com in last 30 days
(5) Google Analytics data for visits to getsongbird.com for year 2009
(6) Percentage share of OS from web clients (source wikipedia.org)

Comments for this post will close on Tuesday 4/6 @ 5 pm PST.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

74 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Source : Blog de Songbird [...]

  2. [...] Article continued… [...]

  3. By Songbird drops Linux support Apr 2, 2010 9:47 pm

    [...] Sad news: Songbird will no longer support Linux. [...]

  4. [...] the popular open source media player has announced that it will halt its support for Linux. Currently the Songbird team is working feverently to meet their next release, NOFX, release date [...]

  5. [...] L’annuncio officiale di Songbird ha un titolo quasi “entusiastico”, sebbene per quanto mi riguarda (e non sono più da tempo un utente del riproduttore musicale in questione) ci sia ben poco da festeggiare: le giustificazioni alla base della scelta di Mozilla sono ancora più ridicole, se mi è concesso l’aggettivo. In pratica troppe poche persone lavorano al progetto per giustificare l’impegno su Linux. [...]

  6. [...] Article continued… [...]

  7. [...] L’annuncio officiale di Songbird ha un titolo quasi “entusiastico”, sebbene per quanto mi riguarda (e non sono più da tempo un utente del riproduttore musicale in questione) ci sia ben poco da festeggiare: le giustificazioni alla base della scelta di Mozilla sono ancora più ridicole, se mi è concesso l’aggettivo. In pratica troppe poche persone lavorano al progetto per giustificare l’impegno su Linux. [...]

  8. [...] a été annoncé sur le blog de songbird hier, c’est à dire le 2 avril, et ce n’est donc malheureusement pas un poisson [...]

  9. [...] | WebUpd8 Más información | Songbird En Genbeta | Songbird vendrá incluido por defecto en los reproductores [...]

  10. [...] | WebUpd8 Más información | Songbird En Genbeta | Songbird vendrá incluido por defecto en los reproductores [...]

  11. [...] Songbird Singing A New Tune Also Read Songbird for Window adds Cd Ripping and MSC Device SupportSongBird 1.2 ReleasedMac4Lin: [...]

  12. [...] | WebUpd8 Más información | Songbird En Genbeta | Songbird vendrá incluido por defecto en los reproductores [...]

  13. By Songbird Drops Support For Linux Apr 3, 2010 6:31 am

    [...] is what Georges Auberger wrote: After careful consideration, we’ve come to the painful conclusion that we should discontinue [...]

  14. [...] Aquí está la entrada original en el blog del programa. Y una gran avalancha de comentarios contra y desilusionados por la decisión. Ojalá se revea o sea una broma. [...]

  15. [...] — Comment #126 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@redhat.com> 2010-04-03 03:55:57 EDT — Does http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2010/04/02/songbird-singing-a-new-tune/ mean CLOSED/WONTFIX for this bug and for whole Songbird [...]

  16. [...] Article continued @ Songbird Blog [...]

  17. [...]   Songbird is probably one of the best open source software and cross platform media players available. Calling it the iTunes for Ubuntu, would probably be the simplest answer to describe its importance. But, the disheartening announcement came from Songbird’s staff that, they are giving a halt to their support for Linux. [...]

  18. By YakiBoo Apr 3, 2010 11:41 am

    [...] cierto, antes de que se me olvide, aquí podeis leer la entrada original, en el blog de [...]

  19. [...] they just lose all their helpful user base? April 3rd, 2010 Yesterday the Songbird Dev’s announced that they will no longer be developing Songbird for Linux.  Not being heavy on music being played [...]

  20. By Grzglo Tech Blog Apr 3, 2010 3:38 pm

    Co dalej z Songbirdem na Linuksa?…

    Georges Auberger poinformował we wpisie Songbird Singing A New Tune, na oficjalnym blogu Songbirda, o zaprzestaniu prac nad linuksową wersją tego odtwarzacza, uważanego powszechnie za wolny odpowiednik iTunes. Songbird porzuca Linuksa Zesp[...]…

  21. [...] LEER DECLARACION DE SONGBIRD<<———- Written by Leoncio in: Sin categoría | [...]

  22. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by S. S said: what the what? ~ Songbird discontinues linux support http://bit.ly/cZjwIC [...]

  23. By Songbird deja Linux | Conexion Geek Apr 3, 2010 8:54 pm

    [...] | WebUpd8 Más información | Songbird Te gusto este articulo, Compartelo! Tagged with: Linux • reproductor • [...]

  24. [...] Mas informacion, en Ingles, aqui [...]

  25. [...] Vía: WebUpd8 Más información: Songbird [...]

  26. [...] multimedia. Les mantendré informado de lo que suceda en los próximos días con Songbird. Leer informe completo (inglés) Blog oficial de [...]

  27. [...] Georges Auberger, “Songbird Blog » Songbird Singing A New Tune,” Songbird, Apr. 2010. via Kroc Camen, “Songbird Drops Linux Support,” OSNews, Apr. [...]

  28. [...] [...]

  29. [...] Aquí encontraréis la entrada original en el blog del programa. [...]

  30. [...] Den Multi-Plattform-Mediaplayer Songbird habe ich hier vielfach erwähnt und empfohlen. Nun kündigt die Entwicklerfirma POTI plötzlich an, neuere Versionen nicht mehr für Linux bereitzustellen – und erntet damit teils hämischen [...]

  31. [...] 4, 2010 Ich war sehr überrascht als ich hier lesen musste das der Support von Songbird für Linux “discontinued” also eingestellt [...]

  32. [...] for Windows and Mac.” In their blog post on the subject, the developers said, “We remain loyal to Linux and the ideology it represents, so we will maintain a version of the software for use by our Songbird engineers who develop on the [...]

  33. [...] ho indicaven els seus desenvolupadors en un article, en què deien que el seu petit equip de desenvolupament no podia fer front a la feina de publicar [...]

  34. [...] the Songbird media player leaves the Linux platform… sort of. I understand there seems to be some resources problem, but then these guys either have a business model that’s not working out or something else is going on. What does “a version for engineer will be maintained”  mean ? Is that the perpetual beta or a broken, unusable version. And why can’t they fix that? Can someone else do it? Odd… [...]

  35. [...] big news today is the announcement by the Songbird team that they will no longer be officially supporting Linux versions of their media player. Community [...]

  36. [...] people ! I have used Songbird as my music player for some time, but since developers decided to bail on us, I decided to find an alternative. It has to be cross-platform, so I picked aTunes which is written [...]

  37. [...] Georges Auberger writes in his blog: “After careful consideration, we’ve come to the painful conclusion that we should [...]

  38. [...] Auberger poinformował we wpisie Songbird Singing A New Tune, na oficjalnym blogu Songbirda, o zaprzestaniu prac nad linuksową wersją tego odtwarzacza, [...]

  39. By Recull 5/4/2010 | SomGNU Apr 4, 2010 11:05 pm

    [...] notícia del Songbird ha aparegut a molts blocs: Alliberats, Mozilla.cat o Cau.cat; i al bloc dels desenvolupadors del Songbird, per [...]

  40. [...] 2010. E’ proprio vero: niente è gratis!Gli sviluppatori di Songbird hanno da poco annunciato che il supporto per Linux non è più conveniente poichè non viene finanziato dagli sponsor. Ecco che la community open-source risponde nel giro di [...]

  41. [...] para Linux Enviar a Twitter Compartir Enviar a Buzz Por Alan Lazalde el 5/04/2010 @10:00Traigo una mala noticia para los usuarios de Songbird en Linux: [...] Después de haberlo considerado detenidamente, hemos [...]

  42. [...] una mala noticia para los usuarios de Songbird en Linux: … Después de haberlo considerado detenidamente, [...]

  43. [...] freie Musikplayer Songbird wird zukünftig nicht mehr für Linux weiterentwickelt. Während sich Mac- und Windows User auf die lange erwartete Videowiedergabe freuen [...]

  44. [...] decisión ha sido anunciada en el blog oficial de Songbird, en el cual uno de los responsables del proyecto ha indicado que: “Tras una cuidadosa [...]

  45. [...] decisión ha sido anunciada en el blog oficial de Songbird, en el cual uno de los responsables del proyecto ha indicado [...]

  46. [...] próxima versão do tocador Songbird suportará apenas Windows e Mac. O anúncio oficial dos desenvolvedores descreve o lamento da dor de uma decisão difícil, e avisa que apesar do apoio [...]

  47. [...] programadores del popular programa Open Source SongBird, comparado al iTunes de Apple, anuncian con gran sorpresa que han abandonado el desarrollo de su versión Linux por ahora. La empresa [...]

  48. [...] 自由软件播放器Songbird 宣布 停止支持Linux。开发商POTI表示将集中力量开发Windows和Mac版本上,Linux版本将主要由社区开发,不再提供官方支持。目前Linux版本落后于Windows和Mac版。 POTI表示,他们是经过慎重的考虑才作出这一痛苦的决定。很多人可能惊讶,一家采用开源开发模式的公司会放弃支持Linux,但是POTI公司只有一个规模较小的开发团队开发Songbird,因此他们必须有所权衡,将有限资源投入到优先的开发项目上。随着支持的媒体格式和设备越来越多,他们必须作出艰难的选择。 [...]

  49. By How could you?… « Open Source Apr 5, 2010 10:09 am

    [...] Posted by excedio in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment As some of you all may be aware, Songbird will no longer be supporting Linux. They have decided that they can no longer focus energy on us. Here is a snippet from their blog post… Source… [...]

  50. [...] Posted by excedio in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment Songbird Singing A New Tune [...]

  51. [...] conozcan y utilicen Songbird como reproductor de música, hay una mala noticia. El proyecto ha anunciado que dejarán de soportar GNU/Linux para enfocarse en las versiones para Windows y Mac OS X. Sin [...]

  52. [...] Songbird deja de tener soporte para GNU/Linux [...]

  53. By Linux Critic Apr 5, 2010 1:19 pm

    Songbird drops Linux support for next version…

    Songbird, the popular open source media player, will no longer be supported on our beloved platform. After what they call a “tough decision” the Songbird team have decided to drop support for Linux in their upcoming release of NOFX. From the blog: Af…

  54. By No More Linux Support For Songbird Apr 5, 2010 1:45 pm

    [...] Songbird developers Pioneers of The Inevitable (POTI Inc.) announced on their blog that they will no longer be supporting Songbird on Linux platforms. The developers cite their intent to support an [...]

  55. [...] Songbird developers Pioneers of The Inevitable (POTI Inc.) announced on their blog that they will no longer be supporting Songbird on Linux platforms. The developers cite their intent to support an [...]

  56. [...] 2010 Songbird, el reproductor musical de Mozilla, dejará de ofrecerse para Linux, después del comunicado por parte del equipo en el blog oficial, en el que muestran pesar por ello y explican las razones del fin del soporte para el sistema [...]

  57. [...] Songbird Singing A New Tune – Songbird BlogMore accurately, Songbird will stop singing an old tune: the open source replacement for iTunes is dropping support for Linux, though it will continue to work on Windows and Mac versions [...]

  58. [...] Songbird Singing A New Tune [without support for GNU/Linux] This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Germany License. Filed Under Category: Frustration Comments: Comments Off « Passing arguments to the end part of newenvironment [...]

  59. [...] conozcan y utilicen Songbird como reproductor de música, hay una mala noticia. El proyecto ha anunciado que dejarán de soportar GNU/Linux para enfocarse en las versiones para Windows y Mac OS X. Sin [...]

  60. [...] Songbird developers Pioneers of The Inevitable (POTI Inc.) announced on their blog that they will no longer be supporting Songbird on Linux platforms. The developers cite their intent to support an [...]

  61. [...] وبلاگ Songbird و اینجا بفرست [...]

  62. [...] kommende Version des freien Audioplayers Songbird wird der Linuxsupport eingestellt. Dies ist dem Entwicklerblog von Georges Auberger zu entnehmen. While our Linux users are some of the most passionate, do some killer development, [...]

  63. [...] Auberger, one of the Songbird developers, has written a blog post announcing this. After careful consideration, we’ve come to the painful conclusion that we should [...]

  64. [...] Aquí encontraréis la entrada original en el blog del programa. [...]

  65. [...] Songbird Segnala [...]

  66. [...] via songbirdnest [...]

  67. [...] Uno de los desarrolladores de Songbird ha escrito lo siguiente en el blog oficial: [...]

  68. [...] Uno de los desarrolladores de Songbird ha escrito lo siguiente en el blog oficial: [...]

  69. [...] here we are, Songbird is no more supporting Linux platform, so we decided to create our own version, supporting Linux first, but also Windows and Mac OS X [...]

  70. [...] Martin Wow. Just wow. [...]

  71. [...] la noticia oficial se puede leer: Después de consideración cuidadosa, hemos llegado a la dolorosa conclusión que [...]

  72. [...] a disappointing day for Songbird fans on Linux. Actually, the disappointing day was April 2, when Songbird developer Georges Auberger announced the "new tune" for the company: dropping official Linux [...]

  73. By Adiós Songbird « Gabuntu Apr 6, 2010 8:56 am

    [...] de entrar al anuncio oficial y hay una actualización que no me cuadra. Los usuarios de Windows y Mac no están clasificados en [...]

  74. [...] for Linux -> Nightingale After much discussion and internal stress levels rising, Pioneers of the Inevitable decided to drop Linux support for Songbird. This spawned a great sadness in many users of Songbird and Linux, but, as those who run Linux [...]

589 Comments

Subscribe
  1. Moisés Apr 2, 2010 3:13 pm Permalink

    It’s indeed a great loss, but I can understand (as a developer myself) the problems with unfocused work. As a mac/linux user, I am half sad, but maybe, with the linux version available for others to mess around, who knows, someone can pick up where the team left and continue the good work in another realms.

  2. somebird Apr 2, 2010 3:17 pm Permalink

    First ipod support & then linux support… another sad day. :(

  3. Mr. Me Apr 2, 2010 3:25 pm Permalink

    I could never get Songbird working properly in Ubuntu, but hoped it would someday be developed enough to work correctly. I don’t see the point in developing a competitor to iTunes on the Mac with those resources instead. :(

  4. scruss Apr 2, 2010 3:27 pm Permalink

    So you’re now providing an iTunes alternative, but only on the platforms that iTunes runs on? So long, been good to know ya.

  5. Sam Apr 2, 2010 3:34 pm Permalink

    I hope there are a lot of bugs fixed in the new version and not just new features added. I think Songbird is a great piece of Software. But some main functions still have some nerving bugs.
    Keep up the good work.

  6. Chauncellor Apr 2, 2010 3:37 pm Permalink

    Well, looks like I’ll have to start looking at another player at some point.

    Bye.

  7. Dan Apr 2, 2010 3:51 pm Permalink

    I’m gonna throw it out there, iTunes is better than Songbird. The only interest I had in Songbird was the fact that I could run it on linux, allowing me to ditch windows, but now I can’t, so goodbye Songbird.

  8. Adrianer Apr 2, 2010 4:04 pm Permalink

    That’s sad… And I hoped to finally have a player I can stay with :(

    Looks like I’ll give Amarok 2 another try, soon…

  9. Martin Apr 2, 2010 4:07 pm Permalink

    Wow. As someone who uses Songbird on Windows, Mac, and Linux, you should know that I choose Songbird because it’s cross-platform. You will lose Windows and Mac users because of this, as well as momentum from the F/OSS community.

  10. juancarlospaco Apr 2, 2010 4:11 pm Permalink

    R.I.P. Web Browser

  11. Antonio Apr 2, 2010 4:15 pm Permalink

    I don’t think anyone’s going to be happy about this, even Mac or Windows users.

    It’d be great if at some point we could hear the specifics about why Linux support is being dropped.

  12. William Chambers Apr 2, 2010 4:16 pm Permalink

    Good to know you don’t want users anymore. Nice going.

  13. Brews Apr 2, 2010 4:19 pm Permalink

    Well, bye everyone :-)

  14. geekonabike Apr 2, 2010 4:23 pm Permalink

    I like the songbird I have now fine. I may ever back up a ver or 2
    microcrap user don’t know how to use half to stuff in there now, so it’ll be years before they start using any features we don’t already have.

  15. Reinaldo Apr 2, 2010 4:27 pm Permalink

    Suport for Mac and Windows, but not Linux. Why keep support to Mac? Why keep yours focus only windows. It’s sound me preconceituous.

  16. Dim Apr 2, 2010 4:29 pm Permalink

    I use Windows 7 and sometimes boot to Ubuntu. Had Songbird on both. Now will look for an alternative on both.

    Bye.

  17. Chloe Apr 2, 2010 4:31 pm Permalink

    Wow. Just wow.

    You’re dropping the only users that don’t already have access to alternatives that are as good or better than SB?

  18. John Apr 2, 2010 4:36 pm Permalink

    Logically I know that this had to be done to meet the development goals that were in place.
    Personally though I want to cuss up a storm. I had high hopes for Songbird, but they won’t be met on the OS I use. I also can no longer suggest Songbird to people (since I won’t be able to test it), which is sad. Good bye Songbird, thanks for all the music played.

  19. Steve Apr 2, 2010 4:45 pm Permalink

    I’m a bit disappointed. I was literally going to give songbird a try today but then saw tweets and dents about no more Open/Free OS releases with a link to this post. That really sucks … I hope you guys end up being able to come back to the Free world in the future.

  20. Ethan Gibson Apr 2, 2010 4:54 pm Permalink

    I think It would be interesting to see a graph of the split of Songbird use on different operating systems!

  21. Foolishgrunt Apr 2, 2010 4:55 pm Permalink

    It’s about time!

    I’m a Linux user, it’s true. I dual boot with Windows 7, but I tend to prefer my Ubuntu system. While I did once use Songbird religiously on both platforms, I eventually grew tired of the *perceived* lack of dedication to the GNU/Linux platform. I say *perceived” because I realize I have no right to judge the level of commitment on the part of the dev team. But that is the impression I got: no CD rip and no universal hot keys were at the top of my list of reasons. So I moved on. I no longer use Songbird on my Linux box. And frankly, I’m glad I did. I got a chance to experience a bunch of great Linux-only players. I believe the rest of you Linux users will be doing yourselves a favor by expanding your horizons, as well. (Incidentally, I ended up settling on Exaile.)

    Just like I moved on, the Songbird team moved on. I applaud that. Any effort they can spend creating a viable iTunes alternative is effort well spent in my book. I still use Songbird as my player of choice on Windows, and if dropping Linux will help POTI make a better player for my Windows box, I approve. I’m convinced that the world will be well-served if we can convince even a few people to switch away from iTunes, but that won’t happen unless there’s an alternative the iJunkies are comfortable with. Songbird is the best alternative out there at this point, and I’ll support any move they make to improved themselves.

    So good job, team. You’ve earned at least one fan.

  22. Matt Apr 2, 2010 4:57 pm Permalink

    Well, after hearing this I’m going to just use rhythmbox for ubuntu.

  23. CW Apr 2, 2010 4:58 pm Permalink

    Goodbye!

  24. Yam Mesicka Apr 2, 2010 4:59 pm Permalink

    I was translating Songbird into Hebrew, and some “healthy considerations” made me stop translating it for you.
    Hope you will reconsider your “prioritize”.
    Thank you,
    Yam Mesicka.

  25. AG Apr 2, 2010 5:05 pm Permalink

    Well there goes Songbird’s unique selling point, for me at least. What a shame.

    Wait, is this an April Fool’s thing?

  26. Mike Frisco Apr 2, 2010 5:13 pm Permalink

    Let me get this straight.

    You’re adding support for video – which nobody asked for, aside from some hardware partners of yours – and still have no support for audio compilation tags – which many of your users ask for on a regular basis.

  27. meh Apr 2, 2010 5:16 pm Permalink

    Good riddance.

  28. Jon Pritchard Apr 2, 2010 5:30 pm Permalink

    Songbird appeared to tick all the boxes for me, cross platform, Mozilla based. However something about it just didn’t click with me. Now that I’ve moved completely to Linux this is sad news as possible future development could’ve piqued my interest. Sorry to hear you’re being forced to make this decision.

  29. guitarMan666 Apr 2, 2010 5:32 pm Permalink

    While I am quite upset that Songbird for Linux is no longer officially supported, it’s not an end. On the contrary, it’s a chance for a beginning. Linux users with the right knowhow can fork Songbird and make a Linux-specific media player to their specification without being hindered by the goals of the Songbird company.

    I will continue to use Songbird until bitrot takes it and then I’ll go back to Banshee.

  30. Andrew Luecke Apr 2, 2010 5:33 pm Permalink

    Actually, its worth noting that some of us are considering making an unofficial build, which at first targets linux (so that means possibly even MTP/MSC/CD ripping support for linux), that runs in parallel with POTI’s development (it will probably be called Lyrebird).. http://talksongbird.com/

    Basically, just Songbird with slightly different plugins, and some different patches (which hopefully make it back into the main tree)

  31. jesse Apr 2, 2010 5:37 pm Permalink

    Aww, too bad. I was looking forward to more stable versions on linux. I can see how there was not enough manpower behind it, but, ultimately, it was the wrong decision

  32. AG Apr 2, 2010 6:02 pm Permalink

    @Andrew Luecke

    Well that might be good news… but Lyrebird? As in sounds like Liar? [Seriously is this an April Fool's?!]

    Why not Phoenix? [as it's for Linux]

    Or Freebird?

  33. Mike Apr 2, 2010 6:06 pm Permalink

    Well, that’s too bad. Although if it runs properly in Wine, it may not be a total loss.

  34. Nate Apr 2, 2010 6:18 pm Permalink

    Wow… I am surprised and disappointed by this decision. Being cross-platform was one feature that truly made Songbird unique. Now it’s looking more and more like an iTunes clone. I was willing to overlook some deficiencies since I could run Songibrd in Windows and Ubuntu. But given that iTunes searches faster, has smoother album art scrolling, and more readable font sizes, I may have to go back to it…. ugh.

    Please reconsider your decision… scrap video playback and double down on cross-platform compatibility and general speed and UI improvements. This would result in a better music player.

  35. Jack Waterworth Apr 2, 2010 6:21 pm Permalink

    Just finished uninstalling songbird. Spent the last couple of years telling all my linux buddies that songbird was the shit and the best media player available for linux. Also promoted it through my blog very often.

    Congrats. One less fan.

  36. Karit Apr 2, 2010 6:43 pm Permalink

    A very sad day indeed. Looks like I will have to find something else to use on my Ubuntu box. Songbird it was nice knowing you and even have some of your tshirts but with no linux support I will have to go else where.

  37. GeekShadow Apr 2, 2010 6:54 pm Permalink

    too bad !

  38. kaibone Apr 2, 2010 7:05 pm Permalink

    This is an April fools joke, right? It’s sad that the one good open source media library manager is shutting doors left and right. The lack of iPod support is disturbing… one of the biggest draws to Songbird is the fact that it replaces iTunes… well USED to replace iTunes…
    I’m a Windows user. I’m getting ready to dual boot Linux, and my next system, to be completed mid-year may potentially be running only Linux. This is a sad day to see Songbird no longer supporting this branch of their development.
    I think the video playback is important, but not to this end. I can only wonder as to what’s next: forcing users to join an online music club, no longer supporting MP3 format, paying for a license?

    Another Songbird fan now seeks an alternative to an alternative of iTunes.

  39. AF Apr 2, 2010 7:07 pm Permalink

    Another Mac/Win/Ubuntu user here who won’t be using Songbird on any of my machines in the future.

  40. Assumer Apr 2, 2010 7:42 pm Permalink

    Well looks like I’ll be hunting for an alternative on both linux and windows now. And here I had just been raving about songbird to others as a great linux/windows media player. Hopefully amarok development will bring themselves back to the functionality of amarok 1.4 and someone can fill the void you’ve decided to leave.

  41. Avuton Olrich Apr 2, 2010 7:47 pm Permalink

    This is the biggest “wow” moment I can remember since I heard SCO was talking about IP being in Linux. Being non-portable is just a bullshit excuse about having really crappy code, especially these days when so much, media wise, is cross platform. Incredibly bad move. Lost another fan who used you on Windows as well, but will never touch it again.

  42. Astar Apr 2, 2010 8:17 pm Permalink

    I’ve been using it on ubuntu\win7 but now are going to uninstall on both. Don’t need another-itunes, which, by the way, can’t work with my ipod.

    Very disappointed.

    On other hands, i think that all new “features”, which is not about music player are crap. video? cd-ripping? oh c’mon, through it out!

    I suggest to all linux users give a try to Banshee. It’s pretty good, and much better than Rhythmbox.

  43. Bob Jones Apr 2, 2010 8:49 pm Permalink

    It’s alright, songbird was never the best music player anyway.

  44. thunder Apr 2, 2010 8:52 pm Permalink

    quit bitching. There is clearly more demand for other things than linux support.

    not happy with it? become a developer and help fill the void. they’re people with lives too…

    they’re just saying they can’t actively develop it right now. you’re free to take up fixing the code, as they clearly stated they’ll keep it around.

    realistically, they have their priorities right. something has gotta give so they go based on demand and need.

  45. Enter Name Here Apr 2, 2010 8:55 pm Permalink

    This is a bit silly. The media player market for Windows is one of the most flooded ones for the platform. There’s iTunes, Foobar2000, Winamp, Windows Media Player, etc. As great as Songbird for Linux is, the alternatives for Windows are much better feature-wise. As for Mac OS X, part of owning a Mac is to use the native software. I don’t know a single person who uses anything other than iTunes on their Mac. The Linux market is improving, but there are so many players that either have broken features or are just plain hard to use that Songbird has a chance to thrive on the platform moreso than any other. It’s a shame the OS that is most supportive of open source is the one that’s being snubbed.

  46. Wes Apr 2, 2010 8:59 pm Permalink

    Oh jeez. Couldn’t you drop OS X support instead? iTunes is used by almost all Mac users, but Songbird is best player around on Linux.

  47. Wes Apr 2, 2010 9:00 pm Permalink

    I mean, hell, I don’t want to use it on Windows if I can’t use it on all my machines.

  48. Bob Feagins Apr 2, 2010 9:03 pm Permalink

    Shame. Guess Songbird team is focusing on whatever Phillips cares about. They seem to have lost touch completely with their original goals.

  49. Patrick Apr 2, 2010 9:06 pm Permalink

    This is a sad announcement. I’ve followed the development of Songbird since pretty early on, my only requirement being Linux support. I am an exclusive linux user and there are plenty of alternatives, all better than an attempt with Wine. I’ve been subscribed to this blog in Google Reader for over a year and waited with anticipation for updates. I’ll be unsubscribing momentarily and I can’t say I’ll be sad to miss any updates now that they don’t involve Linux. Thank you to the developers, I appreciate your time and I’m sorry to have lost you.

  50. bleh Apr 2, 2010 9:31 pm Permalink

    how insulting. if you don’t support linux quit using it.

    no use developing on open source while dissing it like that. songbird… you FAIL.

  51. seb Apr 2, 2010 9:37 pm Permalink

    that’s an incredibly sad and unfortunate and short-sighted decision :(

  52. Warll Apr 2, 2010 9:41 pm Permalink

    Well this is sad, I’ve been a long time user since about 0.6 or earlier I think. I recently got a netbook and installed Ubuntu, and songibrd is on it.

    Why must all songbird inc made features drop linux support? If PMPs are causing the problems then drop support for them on linux, don’t throw the baby out with the bath water!

    I really only have ever used songbird as a music player on my computer, dating back to the time when it use several hundred megabytes of RAM. I kept it installed despit the bad perffermonce and even the fact that it couldn’t play all my music. All because I had faith that it would get better, and it did. I am not about to say that I will be dropping SB but I am saddened.

    Without even a crippled official release I doubt well ever see a Linux version reach par with the windows one again.

    Why are you keeping Mac support anyway?

  53. dantelecan Apr 2, 2010 9:46 pm Permalink

    I trusted Songbird project, but now it disappointed me. I translated it into my languace, but if I can’t use it anymore, why I should continue contributing to it? I recommanded it to many linux and windows users, but if I can’t test it anymore, I can’t recommend it anymore. You will see this was the worst decision Songbird project is ever made. This is the moment when I say goodbye Songbird.

  54. Warll Apr 2, 2010 9:53 pm Permalink

    “you’ll see video support – import, library management and full screen playback.”

    Well, this does make me feel better. Since I don’t care about any of those features I suppose the current version will be enough to last me, forever.

    Is there a plug-in to block updates to the core player?

  55. WindPower Apr 2, 2010 9:54 pm Permalink

    I can’t say this is surprising, but I can say that dropping support for Mac would have been a much better decision, since there’s no reason not to use iTunes on there anyway.
    Bye.

  56. Slim Apr 2, 2010 10:00 pm Permalink

    Brilliant move. Abandon the only platform with a significantly growing userbase, in favor of developing for a platform that already has entrenched apps with far more functionality.

  57. finid Apr 2, 2010 10:02 pm Permalink

    This was released on April 2 so this is not an April F joke. Now that Linux support has been dropped, I just deleted your feed from my feed reader. Exaile is just as good. It has iPod support. I think Rhythmbox does too.

    Bye-bye, for ever

  58. Brie Apr 2, 2010 10:10 pm Permalink

    *sighs* To be honest, Songbird was a bit of a memory hog on my machine. I still can’t deal with Amarok 2 so I guess I’ll stick with Rhythmbox for the foreseeable future.

  59. Totoche Apr 2, 2010 10:23 pm Permalink

    What a title …

    pffff … what a title ! ! !

    You really think it’s appropriated …
    “Songbird Singing A New Tune” for “After careful consideration, we’ve come to the painful conclusion that we should discontinue support for the Linux version of Songbird.”

    Comm
    Comm
    Comm

  60. Tony Apr 2, 2010 10:27 pm Permalink

    As a blog reader for 2+ years and regular user for ~3 this is extremely disheartening. Seems kinda in line with focusing on video playback. Instead of trying to be the most kickass crossplatform music player around you’re moving towards the mediocre multimedia player that everyone else seems to already be. I wish you all the best of luck but you’ll be moving on without me. I was about to start helping out with development but maybe I’ll try helping those who stay wiith linux supporting the likes of amarok or rhythmbox.

  61. Akshat Apr 2, 2010 10:27 pm Permalink

    You have lost respect from me and I don’t think Windows or Mac users might use a player as bloated as Songbird for iPod sync when other alternatives exist.

  62. Žiga Apr 2, 2010 10:34 pm Permalink

    This is rather sad and unfortunate news. I have been using Songbird for several years now, exclusively on Linux (I use iTunes on Mac) and was following it’s development with great anticipation and interest.

    Hopefully you will reconsider your decision, as there are many other Windows and Mac music programs already, but no other quite like Songbird for Linux.

    In any case, good luck and thank you for all your great work!

  63. 2Tall Apr 2, 2010 10:40 pm Permalink

    A sad day indeed. I’ve been following Songbird since the really early versions and just recently started using it as my music player on Ubuntu because it did the sync I needed it to do with my Android phone among other things. I’ve recommended it to friends and promoted it within the company I work for and now here they drop Linux support for full screen video? It’s disappointing. I’m sure there are good reasons but it’s always sad to see a project leave the roots that gave it prominence.

    Uninstaling…

  64. Arnab Das Apr 2, 2010 10:41 pm Permalink

    This is really sad. Songbird was a compulsory software on my Linux installations. But frankly, anyone who would want to use something like Songbird on Windows or a Mac would probably use iTunes.

    Songbird was so popular on Linux because there wasnt any such alternatives (look-wise). But on Windows and Mac, Songbird is just another average software. I’m afraid Songbird has now lost its identity.

  65. louis-rémi babé Apr 2, 2010 11:28 pm Permalink

    Who will recommend new users to use Songbird now?

  66. cf Apr 2, 2010 11:33 pm Permalink

    honestly, the only way you are ever going to win the hearts of any audience right now is if you become completely lightweight and get rid of the unnecesary web brwoser built in.

    seriously, or this project will fail, trust me.

  67. andrexus Apr 2, 2010 11:40 pm Permalink

    I’m using Songbird about 2 years only on my Linux (Ubuntu) machine. (Because I have only this OS installed). I think, that each program should do only one thing (in this case audioplyaback), but impeccably. There are a lot of software for playing video. As for me it is absolutely useless feature for AUDIO player. Songbird was IMHO the best player for Linux I was using, despite the fact that there were some bugs and other missing features.
    But now it is over. I would still using Songbird, but until I find an adequate alternative for Linux.
    I will stay reading your blog and hope that you change this strange decision

  68. Žiga Apr 2, 2010 11:44 pm Permalink

    In my opinion, one of the most important reasons Flash got so popular was that it had plugins for all major platforms, INCLUDING Linux. Fancy plugins, which worked only on Windows never got anywhere…

    Linux might look like it has a small market share, but it matters a whole lot!

  69. Alex Apr 2, 2010 11:45 pm Permalink

    Extremely disappointing, you had one of the strongest media players on Linux, and yet one of the weakest on the others OS’s why lose your advantage?

    I use OS X, Ubuntu, and Windows 7, all with Songbird, and I would rather you stopped development on the Windows and OS X platforms than drop Linux.

  70. Giorg Apr 2, 2010 11:50 pm Permalink

    This sucks. A lot.

  71. queency Apr 3, 2010 12:19 am Permalink

    never heard of it.

  72. gravy Apr 3, 2010 12:38 am Permalink

    Never heard of it. May be the problem not in Linux? Byeee

  73. Jigar shah Apr 3, 2010 12:46 am Permalink

    Avoiding certain features was still ok. Now no SB for linux….That’s just outrageous. I am sad…Bad weekend for me. I don’t remember a single day i haven’t checked checked songbird timeline to see when its getting released. Just for my Linux. I understand your concerns about small team and all. But developing SB for platforms which already have plenty of software isn’t some waste of resources ? I know i am biased…But Linux platform is coming strong..Look at new Ubuntu …Its as promising as any OS. Open source OS are because of softwares on it. Firefox, OpenOffice are just few names.

    If i was in your place, with money to spent on team from my pocket…definitely i would have selected spending it where money is coming from…Partners…Device makers…They don’t have special love for Linux. I can understand. Making it (Linux version) “completely” open may help Linux community. I wish i was Mozilla hacker …Would have definitely picked up this one for my weekend job. Hope someone from large mozilla community will pick this up.

    It would be very helpful to know under which license you open this up for community. Sad day.

  74. cristi Apr 3, 2010 12:47 am Permalink

    this sucks

  75. linkit Apr 3, 2010 12:52 am Permalink

    Just a word, ridiculous!

  76. Debian User Apr 3, 2010 12:56 am Permalink

    It is a pity.
    I don’t understand this decision.
    MacOS has its well-integrated iTunes.
    Windows has a bunch of alternatives.
    Linux…. yeah… well… almost nothing compared to iTunes.
    I’m a KDE User and I can say that Amarok is ok but there is a lack of comfort.
    Songbird would be always my first choice if it was better supported.

    Why not changing focus from month to month.

    Perhaps there would be a fork at least

  77. Peter Lairo Apr 3, 2010 1:02 am Permalink

    Without Rip-to-mp3 and Burn support, I cannot get excited about any new release of Songbird.

    Too bad about Linux support, but it’s the Linux community’s own fault for failing to make an OS that is useful to the common user – after even so many years. Epic fail for Linux. Pity.

  78. Thorsten Apr 3, 2010 1:12 am Permalink

    What the hell. Good riddance, me lads. Rhythmbox and Banshee ftw.

  79. Jigar shah Apr 3, 2010 1:16 am Permalink

    @GeekShadow I saw frenchbird blog. Seems you all are very enthusiastic about SB+Linux. Please let me know if i can help if you plan to start opensource build of SB on linux. I am not a mozilla hacker, i am java programmer. But can do good QA on weekends. Trying to learn how to hack Mozilla :)

  80. Marcop20 Apr 3, 2010 1:26 am Permalink

    No, you can’t, I’m using Songbird on my Linux PC for over 2 years.
    Songbird music player is my favorite and I will not use others …
    Please continue the Songbird developement on Linux

  81. mike Apr 3, 2010 1:29 am Permalink

    Woot? You guys are serious?

    If you are, then I wish you all the worst and I am evicting SongCrap both from my Mac and from Linux box.

    You could instead work for Microsoft or do drugs… but this is too much. FLOSS project to drop Linux? Where is your mailing list? I will troll you to oblivion!

  82. Jeremy Apr 3, 2010 1:29 am Permalink

    Why don’t you just be honest and say that your partners didn’t want to fund a Linux build.

  83. FernaLima Apr 3, 2010 1:30 am Permalink

    Rhytmbox FTW!!!

    *ducks in fear*

  84. R Apr 3, 2010 1:31 am Permalink

    I’m also sad (happy!) to say that I’m uninstalling songbird from both my windows and ubuntu pcs.. so long!

  85. Tist Apr 3, 2010 1:31 am Permalink

    these reactions make me sad. These people are developing a nice product, giving it away, with source code and all. While they themseves are discontinueing linux support, they still give others the chance to add the missing code to support linux.

  86. Kshitij Chawla Apr 3, 2010 1:43 am Permalink

    Well. I don’t like to flame. I have rarely used abusive words. But this was like base treachery. Fuck you! You are supporting it on Mac but NOT Linux!!! There are great players for windows and mac but not Linux. That’s why SB was so important!

    I don’t know how to express my anger.

  87. jay Apr 3, 2010 1:47 am Permalink

    No chance competing with itunes. Maybe someone else will develop Songbird now..

  88. NikolaM Apr 3, 2010 1:54 am Permalink

    I installed Songbird on multiple MS Windows machines, only with knowledge in mind that Linux version IS main development version.

    I recommended and installed program to multiple Windows users,
    telling them at the same time there IS available Linux version and that they could continue to use it WHEN migrate from Windows to Linux.
    (Like Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, Gimp, Skype.. ringing the bell?)

    Now I lost any reasons to recommend it to anyone.

    If Linux version by default will recieve less testing and community-only support, you migh as well ask community for help and involvment, instead of speaking of “platform support”.
    As I see it, main reason is they do not want new features to go into Linux/OpenSolaris version.

  89. xen Apr 3, 2010 1:56 am Permalink

    Not really surprised. You really disappointed with your last major release, leaving the Linux version very crippled compared to the Windows version.

    Extremely disappointing.

    I think this will sadly hurt you more than you would expect.
    Your reaction is very similar to what Zenbe did to those of us who had been using and testing their product for a while; but because we were using their product for free they just gave us the boot.

  90. Erik Westrup Apr 3, 2010 1:56 am Permalink

    No! This is a great loss. I really like SB under Linux and it’s future looked bright, and now you drop it?

    I hope you’ll get your minds together by next release.

  91. Jigar shah Apr 3, 2010 1:58 am Permalink

    Harmony FOSS guys..!! Frenchbird.org is proposing some opensource development. Have a look at it. They have quite a bit of initial document in place. Just say we do. Or Join in. Trust community power. I am sure POTI people will help. They can share some resources like they said buildbot. Or probably Fund few bucks :) Of course, All these needs developers. And some full timers too. Lets see how things come up. All the best Frenchbird.org people. Its you who can Help.

    http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AcU_F4NVncBXZGc0MmNkY3FfNjY0cDRrcW1mcw&amp%3Bhl=en&amp%3Bpli=1&pli=1

  92. camaron Apr 3, 2010 2:00 am Permalink

    I won’t add to the pool of disappointment, disbelief and anger. For now my hopes are on the Lyrebird project (or any other that keeps Songbird afloat)

  93. Niels Egberts Apr 3, 2010 2:01 am Permalink

    Well, goodbye songbird. Cause I won’t use it anymore…

    All the best! And who knows, maybe Songbird will meet Linux again in the feature..

  94. Donald Apr 3, 2010 2:03 am Permalink

    2 possibility:

    Or this article is a april joke

    Or this is real and i think that Philips (see this article:http://www.consumer.philips.com/c/mp3-media-player/22126/cat/us/) do not want to develope on linux.

    Very compliment

  95. kp Apr 3, 2010 2:22 am Permalink

    too bad, while linux is a growing platform..

  96. Jo Apr 3, 2010 2:23 am Permalink

    It HAS to be an April joke!
    Anyways.. was good while it lasted. Thanks for all you’ve produced in the past!

  97. seba Apr 3, 2010 2:24 am Permalink

    Sad. On windows & mac there are much better players than Songbird. Linux is still in need of a good player.

  98. tjajab Apr 3, 2010 2:47 am Permalink

    Sad to here that. I was waiting for it to develop somewhat more so I could start using it in my Ubuntu installations.

    I must agree with seba stating that there are already good players for Windows/Mac, and that Linux really needs a project like Songbird.

  99. Mars Apr 3, 2010 2:55 am Permalink

    That’s really sad. I swapped over to Ubuntu two years ago, and Songbird was the first application I installed by myself without the package manager. It was so great looking that I stepped out my my comfort zone because I wanted it that much. (For someone who used Linux for, like, a week, installing a program was hard-looking. XD And I messed it up at first too.) I wouldn’t even mind if the Linux version lagged behind the others. I just love the program. Guess I’ll just keep using it until someone new picks it up or it’s too outdated to work anymore. Plus, Rhythmbox still like us…

    Thanks for making a really awesome product. I hope the Mac and Windows versions work out. Honestly though, I know that I’ve suggested this to people across all platforms. It seems like abandoning the Linux version might hurt you with every OS, because your Linux users are probably less likely to suggested it to others.

  100. Leolas Apr 3, 2010 3:03 am Permalink

    if that is not an april fool, it’s just a stupid idea

  101. Josef Apr 3, 2010 3:04 am Permalink

    Sad to hear that you don’t have resources. The reason i used singbird on both my linux and windows, (and talking about this app to friends) was the crosscompability, I would rather have seen you concentrating on linux/mac version. Now i just don’t know..

  102. madis Apr 3, 2010 3:20 am Permalink

    You fuckers!!!

  103. dagger Apr 3, 2010 3:22 am Permalink

    Whoever made this decision.. I wonder WHY is she/he still working for Mozilla…

  104. RIP SONGBIRD Apr 3, 2010 3:25 am Permalink

    Why did you kill the greatest ever project, LINUX is always easier to develop for and because your a small company you received more users and support from LINUX and you repay them by joining the other money grabbing companies who follow the trends.

    RIP SONGBIRD

  105. Josef Apr 3, 2010 3:27 am Permalink

    “Honestly though, I know that I’ve suggested this to people across all platforms. It seems like abandoning the Linux version might hurt you with every OS, because your Linux users are probably less likely to suggested it to others.”

    Yes, this certainly apply

  106. Ohad Apr 3, 2010 3:37 am Permalink

    Super dissapointing…
    but I understand the reason for cancelling the support.
    linux’s market share is low (I’ve been using linux for the past 4 years)
    .songbird was one of the best music players for linux.
    I hope that one day the songbird team will resume linux development.

  107. xir Apr 3, 2010 3:46 am Permalink

    i have to be honest i don’t use songbird other than every so often to see what the technology is achieving. Sadly it doesn’t surprise me from people from mozilla, most of their products have linux as an after thought and i think that it has become part of the culture.

    Still hopefully the outpouring may convince you to come up with an alternative, such as offering all linux support to be conducted by the community but with tight communication with the core developers. If you had done this you would have lost nothing and really avoided so much bad press.

  108. kcsmcaahnki Apr 3, 2010 3:56 am Permalink

    For a triple platform user (OSX/Win/Linux), I am deeply disappointed at your decision which robs me of a consistent application set in all my environments. I loved the fact it was portable (Portable Songbird) as well. Bah humbug.

  109. Matt Hertel Apr 3, 2010 4:01 am Permalink

    Deeply disappointed at this, Songbird was my favorite media player, now I have to go find something new. I believe you will come to regret dropping Linux support.

  110. Laurens Holst Apr 3, 2010 4:08 am Permalink

    Well as you can’t even keep up with Windows 7 that has been released for 6 months already, I don’t exactly blame you for not giving Linux the highest priority.

    (I’m sorry, but I had to switch out Songbird for my old musik player again, which by the way saw its last update in 2006 and still works fine.)

  111. Lito Apr 3, 2010 4:39 am Permalink

    If you wanna help creating a community build, join us at http://talksongbird.com

  112. Chriss Kalogeropoulo Apr 3, 2010 4:41 am Permalink

    WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING ????????

    The only reason i used songbird was because i could run a decent media player on Linux. Do you actually believe that you can get a good market share with all those media players on Windows ? Your player became famous because it run on Linux, better not to forget that.
    Some people connected that with the Philips deal. Bad for you since i will NEVER EVER buy another Philips product, they are crap anyways…

  113. vistakiller Apr 3, 2010 4:41 am Permalink

    Epic fail for you guys. First you get all you need from open source and then you turn your back to the open source community.
    I think you lost the train to the future

  114. vaibhav Apr 3, 2010 4:43 am Permalink

    why the poster have a happy face , this is sad news

  115. Tommy He Apr 3, 2010 4:48 am Permalink

    Songbird shifting the focus away from Linux does not mean dropping the Linux. There IS and WILL be Linux build of Songbird in the future.

    Songbird has iJunk rival on Win & OSX does not mean it can not be a good open source jukebox on these platform.

    Keep on going. I will still recommend Songbird to my friends who are reluctant to switching to Linux.

    One of the Songbird Simplified Chinese translator

  116. GS Apr 3, 2010 4:51 am Permalink

    If it wasn’t for the open source ecosystem your project wouldn’t exist.

    My main problem with songbird is that is not a “natural” solution to the music management problem. It was born of a desire not to solve a problem but to prove that set of technologies could be adapted to solve someone else’s problem.

    It always felt cumbersome. The UI has always been laggy and the paradigms applied are inherently broken because they were not made to solve a problem someone had.

    If a project truly “needs” toexist and its code is open someone will maintain it. Sadly I think songbird is such a waste of time that no one would want to maintain it.

  117. Dan Apr 3, 2010 5:01 am Permalink

    And so begins the ignominious path to irrelevancy.

  118. Gorets Apr 3, 2010 5:26 am Permalink

    Burn in hell. I go tray Amarok or Clementine.

  119. anonymous Apr 3, 2010 5:32 am Permalink

    R.I.P.

  120. Jack Waterworth Apr 3, 2010 5:36 am Permalink

    Even if you supply a linux version of songbird, or decide to bring core development back for the linux operating system, i will never use your product again.

    It’s fucked up that you can just turn your backs on so many fans, with the title of ‘singing a new tune’. This will never be forgiven. I have been promoting this application for years, but now i will be telling everybody to stay away. You have nothing to offer anybody any longer. Good luck with your future endeavours.

  121. Cristobal Apr 3, 2010 5:38 am Permalink

    Songbird lie, Songbird leave Linux because of money out with Linux.
    If you’re truly free software defenders then, songbird only would programming for Linux and no for Mac and Windows.
    Songbird betrayer.

  122. didencool Apr 3, 2010 5:40 am Permalink

    just for count, goodbye mozilla, hello google.
    this was very sad move.

  123. ahe Apr 3, 2010 5:41 am Permalink

    I use Songbird on Ubuntu and Windows because it has the best Shoutcast plugin I know of. It’s not great a really great program because it is far from being as responsive as it could be. I always hoped you get your act together and make this thing really fast.

    Now you drop one of your greatest features (cross-platform compatibility) just to make Songbird even more bloated by adding video playback to a MUSIC player? Maybe you missed something but all three major OSes already come with video players that use less system resources and feel more responsive when playing video than Songbird does when playing audio.

    I’ll continue to use Songbird but only until I find something else that has comparable Shoutcast support.

  124. Joon Ha Apr 3, 2010 5:47 am Permalink

    Hi,

    I’m very sad to see this. But I wish you the best of luck with your continued development for Windows and Mac. Maybe someday when you’ve developed the others you can come back to Linux.

    Good luck!

    Joon

  125. lp Apr 3, 2010 5:49 am Permalink

    Idiots! Dropping Linux support. You’re clueless! Screw Windows.

  126. sudol Apr 3, 2010 5:52 am Permalink

    First, thanks for doing it untill now.
    Second, Songbird developers wont work on a linux version. The source is still there, if someone is willing to do the job…
    Third, I think this will hit very very hard on this player, it’s generating a very bad karma and media against it. I hope I’m wrong, we’ll see.

  127. Joe Apr 3, 2010 5:57 am Permalink

    Well, now you’ve just become another also-ran Windows media player. Forget all the recommendations I was giving out. I’ll just switch back to what we were all using before.

    Just lost all of my usage, along with all of my co-workers.

  128. Dale Stubblefield Apr 3, 2010 6:01 am Permalink

    As a native Ubuntu user for several years, I will stop going out of my way to install Songbird and just use the native Rhythmbox instead.

    Thus is the fate of all successful software start-ups that supports Linux. To sell out. I realize that bills have to be paid, but it is still a sad day.

  129. xir Apr 3, 2010 6:02 am Permalink

    Well seeing as ubuntu now has a music store im thinking that they may be worried about the share of 7 digital revenue going away in linux anyway.

  130. JW Apr 3, 2010 6:08 am Permalink

    This is a shame. Windows and Mac already have a plethora of players which are solidly locked into their tied-down APIs and business model. This was, and I emphasize was, a nice alternative on Linux and showed promise.

    Now Songbird is just another “me too” audio player for Windows and Mac.

    Development on Linux is a cycle and self-supporting. Work on applications like this will ultimately drive the support for the media devices. And then everyone benefits. Dropping Linux support altogether does not help make things better. It feeds the cycle of giving into Microsoft and Apple.

    This singular action makes Songbird no different than the other options on Windows and Mac. The UI is just a different flavored candy coating for the same old proprietary API. It is sad. It doesn’t help.

  131. darkhole Apr 3, 2010 6:13 am Permalink

    I’ll stop of recommend Soungbird… 5-6 machines less… On Windows)

  132. m Apr 3, 2010 6:13 am Permalink

    Then I will no longer use myself, or recommend songbird to anybody for any platform. Sorry.

  133. Richard Apr 3, 2010 6:18 am Permalink

    This is such a shame because Songbird showed such real promise. We all wanted it to be the Firefox of the media players but it appears as if you got distracted on the path to greatness. Windows has Winamp, MacOS has iTunes. Linux has loads of players, all of which are lacking. Alienating one of the most passionate groups of people on the Internet and turning your back on one of the most important platforms of the future seems to doom the project to ‘just another insignificant media player’ status… :-(

  134. v4ldemar Apr 3, 2010 6:18 am Permalink

    Sorry but this sounds like a great bullshit!
    Songbird 1.4.3 run very fine on my Linux system and I really don’t understand what is the problem. Maybe some “Donator” is not happy to see Songbird on Linux? Holy shit I’m furious!

  135. Mistuh_d Apr 3, 2010 6:21 am Permalink

    I haven’t used Songbird since they ditched Ipod support, but I left it on my machine because I’m a dreamer. Well, the dream is dead, and I’m off to uninstall it now.

    I have to agree with others who have commented on the steady push toward feature bloat at the expense of core function. All I want is a player that will play my music and sync it to my media player. I’m not even asking for sharks with laser beams on their heads.

    May the fork be with us.

  136. Tomas Apr 3, 2010 6:23 am Permalink

    Ohh guys… This was the worse decision in the company history… How could you do that? The most of the users were linux and… you drop support? Bad.. . too bad. Looks like i’m finally droping to MPD: A way FASTER and BETTER player, that I HOPED Songbird one day could be. Good bye!!

  137. Horazont Apr 3, 2010 6:29 am Permalink

    Well. That is really sad. I had seen Songbird as THE (for me only, because I am not that happy with the alternatives around (amarok, rythmbox, xmms)) player for linux.
    I also do not see the point. On Mac and windows, there IS iTunes, which could be used, windows users even have the best player in the world, Winamp, but in the Linux world, there are not so much alternatives.
    I think, I will continue using Songbird for a while, and see how the nightlies are going, but on long term, I will have to switch I guess. And that also means, that I have to stop the support for Tagger.

    Maybe I will try how Winamp is working on wine, we’ll see.

    You wrecked my day, Songbird team.

  138. Mx Apr 3, 2010 6:33 am Permalink

    Songbird R.I.P.

  139. JK Apr 3, 2010 6:34 am Permalink

    Dropping Linux support (which is widely demanded) for video support (which nobody cares about.)

    right…

  140. fack face Apr 3, 2010 6:36 am Permalink

    Fucking losers. Windows sucks

  141. Carlos Brolo Apr 3, 2010 6:51 am Permalink

    Now How can I migrate all my playlists to rithmbox???

  142. gonzo Apr 3, 2010 6:57 am Permalink

    Windows and Mac are priority? Don’t be such tit.
    There are lots of music players on these platforms and sorry, but yours won’t become popular on them.

    Bad choice!

  143. Neo Apr 3, 2010 6:58 am Permalink

    NOOOO!!!
    I love songbird in my linux box Others sucks!!! Windows sucks!!

  144. Chauncellor Apr 3, 2010 7:01 am Permalink

    Just noting:

    Wow, Rhythmbox is a great player! (This isn’t out of spite)

    I think anyone looking for a good player should look right there; it really is fantastic! I haven’t tried it for a few years ;)

  145. bvn Apr 3, 2010 7:02 am Permalink

    Who the hell cared about video support??? F*cking nobody!

    It is a shame you devote effort towards video support and Mac, when linux is far more important.

  146. pad Apr 3, 2010 7:03 am Permalink

    I checked the date… it wasn’t post the April first day… my bad

    That’s very sad… I use it on my Linux OS since the first version!

    …I told them…and now many of my friends use it on their Mac or Win … or Tux…

    I love all what you have done for us until now… and hope you’ll come back… in the free open world… in the future

    Because the right good solution… is a solution for everybody…

  147. Thunderwing Apr 3, 2010 7:06 am Permalink

    Thanks for reminding me! I’ve been meaning to uninstall Songbird from my Mac anyway. It has never worked right for me. Personally, I don’t care which platforms you support or don’t support (Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris, Android, iPhone, etc.). What I care about is that YOU MAKE A PRODUCT THAT ACTUALLY WORKS. You have failed miserably to do that. So, on my Mac, I will stick with that memory hog iTunes, and with Windows Media Player 12 on my PC. Good luck to the Songbird team, and please make a product that actually WORKS sometime in the future.

    BTW, Firefox has always been a product that works excellently. If only Songbird worked even 1/1000th as good…and it has the same name as one of my favorite Abigail Zsiga songs! What an insult!

  148. Harlem Apr 3, 2010 7:18 am Permalink

    Rule #1 When developing an open source app make sure you maintain a linux version.

    Rule #2 Do not drop linux support especially for an open source app

    Rule #3 You don’t have to please everyone, just the linux users:)

    Nice knowing you

  149. ihm Apr 3, 2010 7:18 am Permalink

    wow.

    This must be the stupidest move songbird could do. I wonder what the fuck the developers were thinking. In this kind of business you must know two things:

    1. Its not always about the quantity of users but the quality
    2. You don’t fuck with The Linux, ever.

    When the pissed-off linux users start bitching, songbird devs will regret this decision, but Im afraid it will be too late already.

  150. desgua Apr 3, 2010 7:26 am Permalink

    This is very sad indeed. But thank you for the nice work until now and good look with Windows and Mac OS.

  151. MeneGoOL Apr 3, 2010 7:38 am Permalink

    Goodbye Songbird :(

  152. shockedandawed Apr 3, 2010 7:42 am Permalink

    Holy crap, commentators! They’re a frickin’ company! They can dedicate as much time as they do to development because it’s their full-time job! If this is what the business has to do to survive, then they’re smart to do it! If hardware partners say “we want video playback if you want this relationship to continue,” then you add video playback support! Because that’s how you survive! If they can’t continue to support Linux and still devote enough resources to the aspects of the product that generate revenue, then they drop Linux support!

    I’m disappointed that the Songbird team will no longer continue to actively develop for Linux, but I’m more disappointed by what I’ve been reading in these comments. If you liked Songbird for Linux, don’t give up on it; develop for it! And if you don’t have time to develop for it, don’t blame the Songbird team for having the same problem!

    Maybe this will be the end of Songbird. Who knows. But let’s not wish them ill for making what was probably a very difficult decision. If they can survive, grow their team, and generate enough revenue, maybe they can resume Linux development. That would be awesome! Let’s hope it happens!

  153. Michael Apr 3, 2010 7:43 am Permalink

    well, I was hoping for decent alternative to iTunes rather than another me 2 product. As I delete this from my Linux AND windows platforms, I’ll just have to keep looking for a decent multi-platform alternative.

  154. VSM Apr 3, 2010 7:50 am Permalink

    I think this is a bad decision. Linux is growing and, there are better video players at the moment. Maybe you should focus on the Video Player, but then make the next version to Linux. and one more thing, it would be nice if you could add and option to browse the music by Folders like foobar.

  155. Marc Apr 3, 2010 7:56 am Permalink

    Really Sad, I have never found any better jukebox on linux and now it’s gone :’(

    But it’s tru most features haven’t been ported to linux (mtp fore example)

    Hopefully there ill be a new fork.

    Anyway as long as others use it atleast.

  156. Steven Apr 3, 2010 7:58 am Permalink

    Songbird is a great application for Windows but unnecessary for Linux. Windows has iTunes and very little else while Linux has a plethora of very good music players that run faster and have more features than songbird.
    While I am sad to see it go (competition, even in open-source software, is always good), it was the right decision.

  157. Tyrbok Apr 3, 2010 8:29 am Permalink

    ok! Your product, your rules.
    I was waiting for a good ipod support… now: Banshee?, Exile?, Amarok (again)?

  158. bye Apr 3, 2010 8:39 am Permalink

    Time to switch to Banshee folks. I use it, and I’m satisfied. I do use other players sometimes too, cause I like to be well rounded. At this moment I’m removing some old programs, songbird is going with them. It would be nice for someone to fork it, but I’d prefer if someone would add these features to another app that isn’t dissing linux.

    Good ridance. Enough you big companies shafting us with half baked software, so windows looks as if it’s a better platform. If it wasn’t for this continual shafting, Linux would be more popular than Mac even. But thanks to moves like this (e.g. Skype?) look where we are still at today…

  159. mike Apr 3, 2010 9:11 am Permalink

    This smiling retard who wrote announcement talks like “Songbird singing a new tune” is a good thing. While at same time he admits that Linux users do best development, write best bug reports and do most of word of mouth marketing, he says that Songbird is decided to stick a knife in our back anyway… probably because some Linux hating corporation (Philips, hint hint) told them to do so.

    It is not about being a company, it is about complete stupidity and idiotic decision making on part of Songbird team. It is about having no personality on its own. Real open source companies have some principles which are not for sale, while Songbird-like companies give up everything for shiny nickels, even if it is obvious that they are going to be left with no users when nickels dry up.

    I expect that GPL is next to be chopped, since some corporations hate that too (that is probably a reason why v3 of GPL is not used). Just use some of Microsoft Shared source licences, you might also get shill checks for that. You can also patent some stuff and later use it to sue real open source media players. You can be new SCO. SCO failed, but you can do it “right”.

  160. blackpanther Apr 3, 2010 9:34 am Permalink

    you could:
    1) ask for programmers from the linux world to support your effort.
    2) ask for more donations for continuing supporting the linux version.
    3) alert that there will be a problem with the linux version if the above 2 tasks were not accomplished.

    BUT NO!

    You preferred to announce the unspeakable without a simple warning…
    Now, I wonder!
    What about the android or the maemo edition that is advertised ?

    I was very proud of my ubuntu songbird and I was converting people to linux showing this version…
    Now, I feel so disappointed…

    PLEASE IT IS NEVER LATE TO CHANGE YOUR MIND!
    Till then well done to all these persons that try to fork it and make it linux exclusive…

  161. Hoto Apr 3, 2010 9:38 am Permalink
  162. Daniel Apr 3, 2010 9:52 am Permalink

    I hope you change your mind.

    I use three OS, i use iTunes on Mac and Win, and Songbird only on Linux… kill the Linux version its the worst option…

  163. Parker Apr 3, 2010 9:56 am Permalink

    This is disappointing.

  164. Duv Apr 3, 2010 10:07 am Permalink

    You know, I am angry at this. I had to look at the date to make damn sure this wasn’t Apr 1.

    Are you serious? I mean really, does the community around Songbird amount for nothing? Because that is what it looks like.
    Instead of weighing your options, appealing to the community for help and resources, You CUT the community off at the knees? That doesn’t really make much sense to me.

    Given the amount of work that has been put into the linux builds… you might want to rethink this decision. Maybe you don’t need to distribute the binaries but cutting support all together is a sad and lazy move. At least communicate your issues with them with your community.

    All this for Video? I really hope you think that it’s worth it.
    Duv

  165. gtfos Apr 3, 2010 10:07 am Permalink

    Off course, Banshee… it all makes sense now. Microsoft payed to Songbird to get away from Linux so Banshee can get more popular. Banshee, a Mono app which is licensed under permissive (gift-like) MIT X11 license. So one more Mono app on every Linux desktop, one less GPL’d app. One more step towards Mono supremacy and Microsoft’s takeover of Linux universe. More material for bullying companies into paying protection rackets to Microsoft.

    I hope Songbird go bankrupt ASAP. I hope you traitors root in hell.

  166. Majki-Fajki Apr 3, 2010 10:11 am Permalink

    Songbird on linux was poor since the beggining. No loss here.

  167. Ryan Peters Apr 3, 2010 10:34 am Permalink

    So, iPod Touch/iPhones are FINALLY supported on Linux, and you give up on it? Really? Not that I liked your player much anyways; too bloated and buggy. Anyone wanting a better player on Linux should look at development versions of Rhythmbox; it’s amazing amazing (and with the right libraries, they support iPods, which Songbird doesn’t even want to support anymore)!

  168. Michael Apr 3, 2010 10:35 am Permalink

    I’m not a SB bird user but I can sympathize with those that do. The decision was really badly thought out and I feel will ultimately lead to the failure of SB. Giving users a cross platform audio solution for GNU/Linux, Windows, and Mac OSX was one of SB’s biggest selling points. Now they’ve gone ahead and cut off what is essentially their backbone. The majority of Windows or Mac OSX users would probably not be using SB were it not for it’s being cross platform compatible with GNU/Linux. Maybe I’m wrong but I don’t think most Windows or Mac OSX users care about software freedom and would ultimately just choose what most consider “best” which s iTunes. I really hope the the video support they’re dropping GNU/Linux support for will be worth it in the end because right now it’s not looking to be that case.

  169. motofix Apr 3, 2010 10:35 am Permalink

    I think you’re clearly need to reconsider you priorities… You’ve lost something important behind. I just hope for a linux fork now!

  170. Sid Apr 3, 2010 10:51 am Permalink

    Ive been following songbird for so long as a linux user. It looks like ill be moving back to amarok now…
    It was nice while it lasted. I loved the player

  171. moragos Apr 3, 2010 11:05 am Permalink

    These are very sad news.
    I’ve been using Songbird for a few years now and kept up with all the issues that an open-source multi-platform application have not because it was the best, but because I like any application that work on all major OS (I use Windows BTW). Songbird has it’s share of problems, and for the past few versions I’ve been feeling it’s development and I are on different path. Versions were delayed forever (without any notification), closed to the public, requested features were postponed and others were inserted.
    I want my songbird to be a music player first, anything else after.

    I did my share of contribution, but sadly I am now looking for an alternative.

  172. Jason Apr 3, 2010 11:08 am Permalink

    I never really used Songbird(I have trouble shaking the whole browser as a app thing) but I can understand why others are upset. To me the decision doesn’t make sense. I agree with Michael that majority of Windows/Mac Users wont even give SB a second glance since iTunes are pretty much the defacto.

  173. eddie Apr 3, 2010 11:13 am Permalink

    WOW!!!! This is truly unbelievable. How can the biggest and best open source music player simply give up on linux? This really shows just how much you believe
    in the open source cause. Whats next are you going to start charging for your application? Mac’s dont have a very big slice of the OS pie(around 10 %) so why continue supporting them, that way you will only be supporting the one truly great and honest scrupulous, and conscientious OS of all Windows. Besides Mac users are much more likely to be happy with iTunes since Mac fanboys practically jizz in their pants over anything that has an apple logo on it. Or hear is an idea why not take a play out of google’s dont be evil playbook, and start monitoring everybody’s playlists under the guise of creating a better experience for them.

  174. Tarek Sobh Apr 3, 2010 11:18 am Permalink

    Bye bye Songbird!

  175. Schalken Apr 3, 2010 11:22 am Permalink

    After the head-scratching delay of the last release, the announcement that the goal of podcast support would be abandoned, and the awful new default theme included in 1.4, I decided I would stick with a lighter music player on my next install. I’m pretty darn disappointed that what at one time was one of the best Linux music players is done for, but the call is yours. I agree with others that you’re probably never going to make much headway on OSX and only a little more on Windows, but Linux has plenty of good mp3 players, too, and a very small market share on top of that.

    Good luck to your project! (I may still use it under Windows.)

  176. DiableNoir Apr 3, 2010 11:29 am Permalink

    Goodby Songbird!

    I was waiting for more performance and stability, but I got a useless features like video playback support. The major reason for me using songbird, is that it is running on Windows AND Linux. Now I need e new player…

    Sorry, folks

  177. Sergey Apr 3, 2010 11:46 am Permalink

    Very disappointing. I will use aTunes (www.atunes.org) under Linux.

  178. Slate8 Apr 3, 2010 12:06 pm Permalink

    Absolutely gutted. Songbird is the only media player on Linux that ticked all the boxes for me. Can’t believe you are turning your back on us Linux users and plan to compete against the hundreds of Windows and MAC media players out there.

    Madness.

  179. harry_seaward Apr 3, 2010 12:13 pm Permalink

    Your rational for making this decision is not for me to judge – it’s your company and you have to do what you feel is right.

    But I’m a Linux user and I LOVE this player. My initial thought was that the reddit headline was a April Fool’s joke – and a terrible one.

    Nope, it’s a terrible truth.

    Really, dumping a huge customer base all to add video? This is a sad day. You obviously don’t care, but I’ll be moving to a new player, regardless of your weak attempts at softening the blow by saying someone else can do the work you’re supposed to.

  180. Bruno Apr 3, 2010 12:19 pm Permalink

    This is sad indeed.

    I stopped using Songbird on Linux sometime after 1.0 came out. Somehow, the font rendering was getting worse and worse (it never looked good, to be honest), several plugins didn’t work all that well, and then songs started to skip on the playlist. It became unusable. And btw, video support? Who needs that? We already have VLC and several other great video players.

    To every Linux user out there, please try Banshee, Rhythmbox, Exaile or Amarok. I hope somebody forks the last usable Songbird for Linux.

  181. W^L+ Apr 3, 2010 12:46 pm Permalink

    I have never met a Windows-only or Mac-only person who uses Songbird. Only those who use Linux-plus-Windows or Linux-plus-Mac. Therefore, I don’t see a reason for anyone to install or use Songbird any more.

    You’re going to compete with iTunes and DoubleTwist (both of which are better products than Songbird) only on the same platforms they run on? News flash: Songbird Swirling Around The Drain.

    So long, guys, and thanks for what you’ve done so far. I won’t be back for your funeral in six to twelve months.

  182. Linux Mx Apr 3, 2010 12:46 pm Permalink

    Unfortunate news; in Mexico endorse the software just came out of Linux and it was multiplatform, but I will stop promoting them because they are a company that changes their vision and betrayed the people who are positioned so that the knowledge. It gives off an ex-follower of you.

    - Spanish (Original) -

    Lamentable noticia, en México promocioné el software sólo por que salió de Linux y era multiplataforma; sin embargo dejaré de promocionarlos pues son una empresa que cambia su visión y traiciona a la gente que los posicionó para que los conocierán. Se despide un ex-seguidor de ustedes.

  183. Sepi Apr 3, 2010 12:47 pm Permalink

    Very sad to hear this. As a lot of the above users mention Songbird was the one player I could use on my Linux and Windows machines. Looks like it’s time to go back to Winamp and Banshee.

  184. fred Apr 3, 2010 12:49 pm Permalink

    I am very disapointed.

  185. Tres Finocchiaro Apr 3, 2010 12:55 pm Permalink

    I just recently found out about Songbird. I quickly founds far superior to RythmBox and Amarok.

    Although I agree with most of the comments above about this being a disappointment, I understand the complications in supporting many platforms.

    I only hope the Songbird code lives on with community support.

    If there’s anything I could say to the developers, that’s THANK YOU! I for one am willing to donate money to keep Linux support. Your product is excellent, and I want the Linux desktop to prosper because of excellent software like this.

    Linux use is on the rise, and Songbird will only further to add value to the experience.

    -Tres

  186. hermes Apr 3, 2010 12:56 pm Permalink

    How disappointing and shortsighted. Good bye $ongbird … have fun in the O$ world.

  187. shaun Apr 3, 2010 1:08 pm Permalink

    If this came a day earlier, I wouldn’t have believed it.

    I thought I had found the solution to my music needs across my windows and ubuntu machines. I guess I was wrong.

    Very bad decision, guys…

  188. Manuel Apr 3, 2010 1:08 pm Permalink

    We have an active LUG around here, and among the first things we did to our client’s machine’s after basic OS installation was installing Songbird. We were not just “users”, we were your “FANS!”.
    Do you think, even a single Mac or Windows user is ever going to recommend Songbird to anyone? They have plenty of good apps to play with already. And they absolutely don’t care about Songbird for that matter.
    A really bad shortsighted decision. You just lost another loyal SB user. Good Bye.

  189. Bye Apr 3, 2010 1:20 pm Permalink

    Disappointing. Removed from my mac and windows too.

  190. David M. Apr 3, 2010 1:24 pm Permalink

    Good luck enduring the attacks of enraged Linux zealots. Desktop Linux is going nowhere, and for what it’s worth, I think it’s a rational decision to make.

  191. malzfreund Apr 3, 2010 1:26 pm Permalink

    For now, I’ll keep SB on my Windows boxes. Simply because I don’t see a compelling alternative (open source or not). As others, I’ll switch to another audio player on my Linux boxes sooner rather than later. I’m thankful for continued development on Windows.

    However, I think developers are setting the wrong priorities. It appears the major development goal is to provide an alternative to iTunes. But you don’t realize that many people prefer to use separate, dedicated applications for audio and video. Imo, you already have the best audio player out there. The goal should be to make it even better. I couldn’t care less about video playback in Songbird. Even if video support was extremely comprehensive and polished, I’d still want to manage my video library separately from my audio library.

  192. Kochise Apr 3, 2010 1:42 pm Permalink

    Some moaners are maybe forgetting that you cannot always get everything for free. Developers have to pay bill so they’d like wages, so the boss have to find sources of revenue. No cash, no product. Windows and Mac users are eager to pay for a good product, not Linux users. Those just gets what they pay for…

  193. Mark Apr 3, 2010 1:50 pm Permalink

    That’s very unfortunate, I guess I’ll have to drop songbird :( :(:(

  194. Dominic Barnes Apr 3, 2010 1:51 pm Permalink

    What the heck?

    As I am sure you can gather, you’ve just ticked off a lot of us (formerly) faithful fans out in the FOSS world. If you can’t support Linux anymore, I have no reason to continue getting excited about your work. The fact that Songbird *was* cross-platform was a major reason I chose you in the first place.

    Hopefully, the development team comes to their senses before it is too late. It’s been a great run, but for now, good bye.

  195. Horazont Apr 3, 2010 1:56 pm Permalink

    Suprising how fast things can go. This morning I did not even think about it, but now I have installed an alternative to Songbird, and Songbird just flew of my harddrive. Hey, now I can update my system properly without having to fear to crash my favorite music player. At least one advantage.
    I feel sorry for the large amount of time I invested in making Songbird better by developing the Tagger addon and some scripts to make it build a nest in current desktop environments, just to be “dropped” now like a piece of additional weight.
    I agree with those who said that you are losing a large part of your userbase now. I will step back to recommend other players for both Linux and Windows, since I cannot support this anymore. You had your chance.

    So long and thanks for the time Songbird was good. Do not expect me at the funeral of this bird, though.

    ps: Winamp in wine is ugly, do not even try it :D . Good Songbird alternatives for Linux: Banshee (reeaaally nice), Amarok (good for the KDE-guys), Rhythmbox (not as good as banshee imo). But nothing can replace the huge amount of Addons one could choose of.

  196. Pablo Apr 3, 2010 1:56 pm Permalink

    Well, I use Songbird in Windows and Mac OS (not in Linux, I prefer Banshee). When I read this, I uninstalled it in all of my machines and I’ll never install it again.

    Goodbye and good luck.

  197. DW Apr 3, 2010 1:57 pm Permalink

    Why am I not surprised? Songbird is being positioned as Philips’ answer to Itunes
    (first they gotta get decent hardware though.) Philips NEEDS this on the Mac and Windows – they sure as hell couldn’t care less about Linux, and POTI is gonna do what the $ says.

    This was obvious when they dropped IPod support.

    (anyone else still have a Philips MP3 player, that only plays encrypted MP3s?)

  198. prakreet Apr 3, 2010 1:59 pm Permalink

    i used to suggest songbird to winamp users saying that it is crossplatform, is built on firefox, so will improve and become as good as firefox with music players.. i have also won many converts for songbird.. i think i will stop my support for songbird till it find time to develop for linux too..

  199. Chauncellor Apr 3, 2010 2:07 pm Permalink

    @David M.

    Have you noticed that nearly every single comment on this page has been from a “Linux Zealot”?

    What does that tell you about the working user base?

  200. nope Apr 3, 2010 2:09 pm Permalink

    traitors.

  201. Gerardo Apr 3, 2010 2:23 pm Permalink

    songbird sucks… Uninstaling…

  202. marios georgou Apr 3, 2010 2:33 pm Permalink

    I have a mac and a linux. I am using songbird as an alternative to itunes mainly because of linux support. Now with Linux out of the equation, why Shall I use the i tunes alternative program rather than i tunes?

  203. zeroneo Apr 3, 2010 2:48 pm Permalink

    I honestly cannot believe what I’m reading. There is really nothing i can say that hasn’t been said before. When i first heard about the philips partnership I though it was going to help the product, but honestly, i cannot help but wonder if they had anything to do with linux support drop (we all know how most companies do not consider linux as a plataform to take in consideration). If there is something that i loved about songbird was the fact that i could use the same application in both windows and linux. To be honest there is barely any reason for me to use songbird in windows and the fact that linux was dropped only makes me want to ditch songbird once and for all.

    You should have just worked harder on improving the UI and make it faster and more usable (specially the media views). Nobody really cares about video support and being a windows/mac only application there are plenty of better alternatives around for both platforms.

    Please reconsider this decision, i would hate to see an open source project with so much promise dying.

  204. df Apr 3, 2010 2:56 pm Permalink

    Loving all the angry freetards realizing how insignificant their little OS is.

  205. FREEBIRD Apr 3, 2010 3:03 pm Permalink

    The fact that some linux haters came here to “celebrate” your awful decision indicates a lot…
    Songbird was everything for me and a program that i could be proud for being a linux user…
    What a disappointment…
    NOW LET’S FORK!!!

  206. John Marsden Apr 3, 2010 3:11 pm Permalink

    Yeah, I am also very sad to read this. I am not sure why songbird was never picked up by the major distro’s but for me it was worth the effort to set up. Sadly its back to Rhythmbox while I look for a new decent cross platform player.

    All the best with the new strategy and thanks for your years of effort.

  207. ovro Apr 3, 2010 3:11 pm Permalink

    I liked Songbird, but I like my Ubuntu more than Songbird… and still we have Rythnbox and Banshee including the marvellous Ubuntu One Song Store! In a world of Ubuntu (and Linux) who need only songbird? Plenty of alternatives are out there…

  208. ian Apr 3, 2010 3:12 pm Permalink

    Way to shoot yourselves in the face. Please reconsider.

  209. Erik Ch Apr 3, 2010 3:12 pm Permalink

    Look, we will have songbird 2.0 , ok!?
    And we can use the 2.1 to build a songbird to linux, all right !?

  210. hybrid-kernel Apr 3, 2010 3:17 pm Permalink

    I won’t bother being verbose and just say that I raged when I saw this.

  211. WOFall Apr 3, 2010 3:23 pm Permalink

    No matter, I’ll just pretend I never liked you anyway :/

    But honestly, even though I’m using Amarok at the moment, this is an almost heartbreaking loss. I can only hope the community manages to keep Songbird for Linux alive…

  212. Chauncellor Apr 3, 2010 3:30 pm Permalink

    df:

    We “freetards” are part of the reason you have been able to use this very program.

  213. Clamm Apr 3, 2010 3:37 pm Permalink

    Bad news… but every developer understands it who needs to get paid for the stuff he develops… I believe that there is a need for an alternative on Windows and Mac… So this is heading the right way. But please don’t loose all your dreams! What i mean is the spirit of songbird. Somehow this gets lost in the last time. The blog is near before dead since Laura has moved. The web isnt emparaced as it had been before. Just making a second iTunes isnt the right way.

  214. Foolishgrunt Apr 3, 2010 3:41 pm Permalink

    I’m about fed up with all these “Linux zealots.” Linux users used to be cool, back in the day. Used to be the only people who ran Linux boxes were ones who knew enough to compile their own kernel. They refused to let corporate greed invade their computers, so they built their own operating system to eliminate their reliance on The Man. I installed my first Debian system because I wanted to be a part of that atmosphere. But it’s not like that anymore. Apparently the new cool among Linux (a.k.a. Ubuntu) users is to act just like Mac users. “I’m not getting what I want! Now fix it, or I’ma throw a tantrum! Waaa!” Grow up: there’s no place for whining on a FOSS OS (free and open source operating system).

    The whole point of creating a GNU/Linux operating system was to be an alternative, where every user could also be a programmer, developing the kind of software that he wants to use himself. It’s be free for anyone to use, but that’s only because no one person owns it. There’s no accountability to customers, because there aren’t any customers, only contributors. You’re free to use it, but quit yer bitchin’. That’s the philosophy your precious little Linux OS was built on.

    So where the hell did all you Linux zealots come off with this stupid sense of entitlement? One of you idiots actually said “Don’t fuck with the Linux.” Are you kidding? What are you going to do, ask for a refund? When you installed your GNU/Linux operating system, you agreed to find your own solution. If you can’t write the program yourself, there’s sure as heck not anyone who’s gonna bail you out just because you cuss at them.

    As much as I love Ubuntu, I hate how it seems to be creating a new generation of idiotic Linux users.

  215. NoOne Apr 3, 2010 3:45 pm Permalink

    I had started to use Songbird on Windows because it was cross-platform, and continued to use it on Ubuntu GNU/Linux. Looks like I’ll have to find something else. It was nice knowing you, bye…

  216. leo Apr 3, 2010 4:16 pm Permalink

    es una lastima, asta nunca!

  217. fred Apr 3, 2010 4:34 pm Permalink

    you guis should try cmus: it’s a very fast console music player.
    it supports Ogg/Vorbis, MP3, FLAC, Musepack, WavPack, WMA, Wav, MPEG-4/AAC, MOD.
    avaiable in ubuntu and debian repo.
    better than songbird

  218. LIB53 Apr 3, 2010 5:06 pm Permalink

    Wow, and i was working on a new feather too. Hopefully someone forks this. Then again, a native gtk player would be in the end.

  219. chemicalscum Apr 3, 2010 5:14 pm Permalink

    Pity – Oh well it was quite bloated but I liked it. It could dig out a lot of stuff about the band you were currently playing with the Mashtape plugin.

    If people are looking for a cross platform music player the Java based aTunes isn’t bad and stands up quite well compared to Songbird. It doesn’t support the ipod like Songbird but anyway Rhythmbox does.

    Rhythmbox is better than I remember anyway. I am about to uninstall Songbird. Bye for now, I might come back to to good Linux community fork of Songbird if one materializes.

  220. Goodbye Apr 3, 2010 5:30 pm Permalink

    Idiotic decision.

    I will be deleting Songbird from my Windows PC as well as my Linux laptop and desktop.

    I am trying to figure out the logic here. People on Windows and Mac *already* have iTunes. This is a one way ticket to irrelevance.

  221. Andydread Apr 3, 2010 5:33 pm Permalink

    Wow we have 40+ users using songbird right now on Ubuntu and about 60 users on windows. NONE of our Mac customers use songbird they just use Itunes. we install songbird on every system we sell. Linux and Windows. Now I am going to have to find something else for our Linux users. We are very disappointed in this decision. This may result in us no longer recommending Songbird to any of our customers.

  222. Brandon Apr 3, 2010 5:35 pm Permalink

    @foolishgrunt and all the other holier than though…these whiners you speak if who don’t know how to code aren’t a new lazy generation. They are the future mass adopters who are crying out to make linux main stream you ignorant fool. Not everyone compiles kernels…some are artists, some are journalists, etc. They PROVE reasons for sb to keep up support. Bc these non-coders still love what linux stands for regardless and help it in other ways besides compiling a kernel. And people like you…need to die off. Your LACK of thought and close mindedness disgust me. You do open source a great disservice.

  223. Chauncellor Apr 3, 2010 5:46 pm Permalink

    @foolishgrunt.

    The more popular something gets, the more people use it. Ubuntu is getting popular, and of course that’s going to mean that there are going to be whining, demanding morons that use it. Get used to it, it’s going to get a whole lot worse. Sooner or later, there’s going to be lame television ads a la Mac about Ubuntu. It’ll get the job done, though, a la Mac.

    You want your elitist little circle of friends? There’re plenty of distros other than Ubuntu; go meet with Gentoo. Go write a program for Puppy. But don’t label all of us Ubuntu users (some of us that *gasp* compile our own kernels!) as whining idiots.

    That aside, this is a very unfortunate decision. While people really shouldn’t be screaming obscenities at POTI, they have a right to call this move stupid.

  224. JuggerNaut Apr 3, 2010 6:08 pm Permalink

    What a dumb move. Linux is as important as Mac and Windows. Linux on the desktop is growing and will continue to grow. I find it hard to believe that you cannot easily support all 3 platforms. I think I smell a rat somewhere!

  225. Brandon Apr 3, 2010 6:16 pm Permalink

    Here here Chauncellor! Seems we were thinking similar thoughts.

    Oh and on sb…I can’t think of one single reason why one in sb’s situation would consider this a good move from a business standpoint, hell any standpoint, OTHER than their backers (the ones with the $) having their own agenda. Of course you can’t blame Phillip’s for this, as they never tried to say otherwise. SB however DID entrench itself in the open source community. SB might want to casually remind their sugar daddies that this is “community suicide” regardless what single users personally believe…alienating themselves from the whole.

  226. Kitsune Apr 3, 2010 6:47 pm Permalink

    Well, bye Songbird. It was fun while it lasted. I guess I’ll have to look for another media player now, I never really liked the alternatives… I loved my add-ones… too bad.

    I’ve been watching this project develop since before 1.0, and it made some gaint leaps since then, but now all that effort seems to have been wasted, at least from my point of view… Will no longer be recommending this program to my friends, it obviously doesn’t have the correct priorities.

  227. Pratik Sinha Apr 3, 2010 7:27 pm Permalink

    People on Windows and MAC already have tons of s/w alternatives! R.I.P Songbird

  228. Pratik Sinha Apr 3, 2010 7:33 pm Permalink

    http://getsongbird.com/jobs/ To get hired, you need to speak only one language, English

  229. elias Apr 3, 2010 8:07 pm Permalink

    Isn’t this too late? April fools was day 1 o.o

    It looks like there are not too many happy people here in the comments.

    I will paste the most interesting comment:

    “scruss Apr 2, 2010 3:27 pm Permalink

    So you’re now providing an iTunes alternative, but only on the platforms that iTunes runs on? So long, been good to know ya.”

    Insightful

  230. Schalken Apr 3, 2010 8:18 pm Permalink

    Guys, I don’t get comments like “there’s already alternatives on Windows and Mac, you’ll never make it!” Windows has, what, iTunes, Winamp, and a couple of others? Linux has banshee, amarok, rhythmbox, exaile, guayadeque, and so on, not to mention console-based players like cmus or moc (the latter of which I’ve been using instead of Songbird for the last month anyway). I do agree that cutting out Linux support doesn’t make much sense in the long run, if they want to get users, but if they’re interested in doing only what Phillips pays them to do, this makes sense.

  231. Sarah Ashland Apr 3, 2010 8:28 pm Permalink

    I can’t wait for you jerks to check the anonymous NOFX usage stats and see that nobody’s using the video features that you’ve worked so hard on for so long.

    I hope Philips is paying you well to override the features your users have been asking for for months.

  232. jarviw Apr 3, 2010 8:32 pm Permalink

    CROSS-PLATFORM. That’s the keyword. That’s the reason why I choose songbird.

    This is a very sad news.
    I will just have to be looking for the next cross platform open source project for my media management then.

  233. Goodbye Apr 3, 2010 8:42 pm Permalink

    Why the heck did they bother building this thing with XUL and Gekko if they weren’t going to keep it multiplatform? And GStreamer as the sound rendering engine???

    They could have saved alot of time and used MFC, the MSHTML and DirectX.

  234. cymon Apr 3, 2010 8:49 pm Permalink

    Betrayed is how I feel. I have used, promoted and helped out Songbird since day one. Mozilla and its ideaology is built on open source just as Linux is….how can you walk away from that community? I don’t even know what to say! Just yesterday I was telling a fellow Linux buddy how awesome songbird is and how he should download it. Now I am lost for words. I have bought shirts, stickers, buttons and more. I believed in something this product obviously isn’t….sad. Banshee and Rythombox suck in my opinion but I guess I will be going back to support them.

    Great message….support open source applications, but only on closed source operating systems…..sad

    Uninstalling now….

  235. Goodbye Apr 3, 2010 8:50 pm Permalink

    Easy solution. Lose the Mac port… keep Linux. The iTunes infrastructure is way too strong on a Mac to ever think you are going to convert a significant number of users.

    Unless you are cooking an alternative to Airport Express, Apple TV, the iPhone Remote App, and the iPad, you can count your converts on one hand.

    Now Linux, on the other hand, needs a first class audio player.

  236. Mads Apr 3, 2010 8:52 pm Permalink

    No more Linux support: Simply sad!

    Good luck with sucking up for M$.

  237. Cassidy James Apr 3, 2010 9:05 pm Permalink

    Wow. See yah, Songbird and POTI. I thought I found a nice media player for Linux that would eventually be able to rip CDs, play video, and manage my mp3 player. I guess not.

    This really kills the mood of community, cross-platform, and open source. Hopefully some skilled developers take up Songbird’s code, clean it up, and release a kick-ass media player for Linux. The kick-ass media player that Songbird should have been.

  238. Bob L Apr 3, 2010 9:42 pm Permalink

    Well what’s the point in learning the interface to yet another media player? I used Songbird on both Windows (5%) and Ubuntu (95%). If I can’t use the same player in both OSes, there is no advantage in using Songbird at all now.

    Rhythmbox’ll do. Strange decision indeed….

  239. otherush Apr 3, 2010 9:43 pm Permalink

    big mistake

  240. Mkaysi Apr 3, 2010 11:04 pm Permalink

    Twitter chat about this http://bit.ly/cOxaV2
    Linux alternatives for Songbird http://bit.ly/cMMWKp
    This article http://bit.ly/cwFFKU

  241. Ali Isingor Apr 3, 2010 11:29 pm Permalink

    It’s short-sighted decision.

    Why keeping Mac port and leaving Linux? Did u know that most of your localizations on different languages made from Linux users? With this stupid decision you will loose not only community support, but also market share on different countries.

    This is suicide decision for an open source project.

  242. Kochise Apr 3, 2010 11:37 pm Permalink

    @Sarah Ashland : “I hope Philips is paying you well to override the features your users have been asking for for months.”

    Philips pays, Linux users begs. To run a company, you need funding, not moaners. Please be a little pragmatic in this liberal and economic driven world :

    http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8

    Windows + Mac : 96,91 %
    Linux : … 1.03 % -> Mhuwahahahaha !

    So get your facts straigh !

  243. devicerandom Apr 3, 2010 11:40 pm Permalink

    Oh well, I’ve got Amarok. Which is cross-platform too, AFAIK.

    Shame on you guys.

  244. Ambleston Dack Apr 4, 2010 12:12 am Permalink

    This is what you get when open source meets with commercialism, drop support for the least and milk the many. Sad, sad day.

    On a brighter note, I only used Songbird once for Linux it was a slow, heavy, clunky beast that crashed constantly, so went back to Amarok. The beauty about Linux and the open source community is choice and as one poster above said, it works with Wine so not a total loss.

  245. Diego Apr 4, 2010 12:16 am Permalink

    It’s an open source project right? Which means that if the open source community wants they can make and send patches with XV/VDPAU/GL/Whatever support to make it work on Linux.

    Then distros mantainers could opt to build and include in distros still, just like with any other software. Maybe the community should help more and be more comprehensive instead of being too whiny and demanding.

  246. Tarek Sobh Apr 4, 2010 12:18 am Permalink

    What a stupid decision!! This news didn’t just make me sad, it also made me angry!! Screw you Songbird!! I’m deleting Songbird right now even from my Windows PC…

  247. Stephan Apr 4, 2010 1:02 am Permalink

    Goodbye little Songbird, they’ve killed you. R.I.P.

  248. Lok Apr 4, 2010 1:20 am Permalink

    That’s a sad day. Songbird is my prefered music player; there is still some bugs and performance problems but this opensource software is awesome. I don’t understand how you could halts the linux support. For me linux is the cornerstone of the open source community it s a nonsense to develop open source software for propriertary systems like microsoft windows and Mac OS and not for linux. And what about all those linux users that have helped you to hunt bugs, have followed songbirds for so long, have believed in this project; you ve betrayed all of us. This decision is stupid selfish and make me cry. I hope you will change this decision!

  249. xen Apr 4, 2010 1:31 am Permalink

    I have just installed Rhythmbox and uninstalled Songbird from my Linux box. Irony is that Rhythmbox is less of a memory hog, much quicker UI, gapless playback, music importing from CD and iPod HAL, CD burning, HAL detection and heaps of other goodies.

    It is sad that Songbird will never release another version for Linux as I liked the UI, but on the other side I found probably a much better alternative.

    And to all those who moan about those of us who are unhappy with Songbird’s decision; sure you need money to run a company, but the last any company needs is to piss of its users and get bad publicity for it.

  250. Benz Apr 4, 2010 1:58 am Permalink

    Damn!

    I thought I had just found a nice cross platform player and had been recommending it to everyone. Oh well back to rhythmbox.

  251. Jordan Apr 4, 2010 2:03 am Permalink

    This is incredibly unfortunate and makes me extremely upset as a Linux user and Songbird developer. While Linux may represent only a small minority of the user base, we certainly represent more than our fair share of the community involvement. It is that community involvement that makes Songbird unique and a threat to the juggernaut that is iTunes. How can Songbird hope to compete against an entrenched, commercial entity without encouraging its developers? I’ll be with Songbird until the bitter end, but this is terribly upsetting and something I disagree with whole-heartedly.

  252. Rien te Hennepe Apr 4, 2010 2:14 am Permalink

    The decision to pull the plug of Songbird for Linux is truly astonishing.
    This is not good for the Open Source Community.
    Continuing the product for Windows can be considered as a victory to the Microsoft-community.
    I use Songbird for my Linux- as well as for my Windows-machine.
    Until now, I’m afraid.
    Pity!

  253. amin farsi Apr 4, 2010 2:23 am Permalink

    bye songbird .

  254. Feh Apr 4, 2010 2:24 am Permalink

    FUCKERS YOU SUCK!
    SONBIRD IS SHIT, LONG LIVE LINUX!
    I hope your company falls and everyone in it is left fucking homeless.
    assloving, putrid pieces of shit!

  255. rt Apr 4, 2010 2:26 am Permalink

    Fuking Mozilla $$$$$$$$$ fom Microsoft Windows

    I am Google Chrom :-)

  256. Addo Apr 4, 2010 2:27 am Permalink

    @Feh:
    Comments like that isn’t going to help… Be glad that the developers put the effort into SB that they did, and let’s hope they change their minds.

  257. anoyn Apr 4, 2010 2:29 am Permalink

    I don’t believe your stated reason for stopping Linux support.

  258. Footoo Apr 4, 2010 2:33 am Permalink

    Very bad move.

    “We remain loyal to Linux and the ideology it represents…”

    What ideology do I stand for as a Songbird/Linux user? I don’t get it.

  259. Tom Apr 4, 2010 2:37 am Permalink

    Can Songbird’s development be totally given to it’s linux community? It seems strange to completely ditch support for the fastest growth market at this point when so much of the groundwork is already completed.

    Interesting to see Songbird giving it’s competitors such a good chance to get ahead and establish themselves when there are opportunities for becoming the standard music app in so many distros since the collapse of RhythmBox. Banshee should be easy to compete with as it is Mono (.Net) based whereas Songbird had the ethical edge.

    Could Songbird(linusx version) be given to the community perhaps through something like LaunchPad?

    Good luck and regards from
    Tom :)

  260. Sad Songbird User Apr 4, 2010 3:05 am Permalink

    Really sad news… I loved Songbird on Ubuntu…

    Support for 3 platforms was a strong argument. Support for 2 is a step toward oblivion.

    Just sad!

    Dominic

  261. DEF Apr 4, 2010 3:41 am Permalink

    Pff you are just losers.
    Adios.

  262. Goodbye Apr 4, 2010 3:46 am Permalink

    I was thinking a far better graphic for this entry would have had the Songbird wearing a double breasted suit, reading the Wall St Journal, lighting a cigar with a $100 bill, and watching Fox News.

    This “jamming on the guitar” thing doesn’t fit your new image.

  263. Dajebus Apr 4, 2010 4:58 am Permalink

    Who the fuck wanted this?
    You totally fucked up a great program.

    Slow clap all around.
    How does that corporate dick taste?

  264. partikelfernsteuerung Apr 4, 2010 5:24 am Permalink

    Songbird always looked like a good example for modern, platform-independent development, using XULrunner and GStreamer. If platform-specific details still make it so hard to have builds for all systems, maybe this is a general problem?

  265. Roderck Apr 4, 2010 5:27 am Permalink

    So this is not April fool joke after all?

    Ok, there is only one thing we can do now: FORK.

    We make better player on top of Songbird codebase, make it truly cross platform (but Linux focused), make real open source company to support it and promote it which will ultimately run Songbird out of the business.

    Then we watch how Songbird crumbles and how idiots who made this decision cry.

  266. Jo-Erlend Schinstad Apr 4, 2010 5:32 am Permalink

    Bye bye birdie.. Sorry you had to go. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1t3cBTb3xPc

  267. Wil Apr 4, 2010 5:41 am Permalink

    NOT USING Songbird ANYMORE. Sorry..

  268. thekingofcheap Apr 4, 2010 5:47 am Permalink

    iTunes is mandatory on Mac — why devote resources to that platform at the expense of Linux? Then again, everything about Songbird’s development priorities has seemed odd to me — No pod-catching in v. 1.0??? Video playback? WTF?

    Even so, I have stuck with it because it seemed to have the most potential and the most polish compared to other Linux options. This is a bummer :(

  269. Andre Apr 4, 2010 6:00 am Permalink

    Bye-bye Songbird.

    Nice to have used you for a while but after this bit of news, I’ll find something else to use – even if it’s iTunes.

  270. Bugger_Me Apr 4, 2010 6:01 am Permalink

    SAD SAD SAD and very very disappointing.

    You kinda crippled the Bird fellas!

    I hope you read all the comments here (not the stupid, insulting ones) and reconsider your decisions.

  271. djhyland Apr 4, 2010 6:03 am Permalink

    I believe you just shot yourself in the foot, Songbird…

  272. Brian Apr 4, 2010 6:10 am Permalink

    You may not realize it now, but when this project is shuttered, you will look back at this decision as being a key step that brought about Songbird’s demise.

  273. Marcos K Apr 4, 2010 6:19 am Permalink

    MacOS X has no future as platform for Songbird because Apple make iTunes and like to control entirely the Mac ecosystem.

    I can understand companies target windows as the main platform when they make multiplatform apps, but Linux is becoming more popular and it is already more popular than MacOS X in many countries.

    Please review your decision to dump the linux version of Songbird. If you need to cut one platform, choose Mac.

  274. Kochise Apr 4, 2010 6:27 am Permalink

    You moaners are just giving Songbird’s Team an insight of what they are loosing as supportive community, just confirming the right choice they’ve made :p

  275. Alex Apr 4, 2010 6:27 am Permalink

    Linux fans have been telling us that Linux is becoming relevant for the past 10 years. My advice: don’t fall into their delusion.

  276. Apopas Apr 4, 2010 6:34 am Permalink

    Macosx support still exists. I never understood the reason though…

  277. anon Apr 4, 2010 6:47 am Permalink

    As a developer of cross-platform applications, I understand that there is always an additional burden with supporting each platform. However, the decision to drop Linux support is rather myopic – it simply encourages more platform-specific code to accumulate, which should not be present in a cross-platform codebase. Let’s not kid ourselves here – once a platform is no longer tested for or supported, library dependencies creep in that prevent new releases from ever working again.

    Also, I suspect perhaps download counts are what drive the perception of Linux as an unimportant platform for Songbird – do note that most downloads probably come from distro-specific repositories, so unless you have some alternative tracking mechanism, you may be vastly underestimating the number of users you will lose. And let’s not forget that Linux support is what gives Songbird a good deal of media coverage as an iTunes alternative, media coverage that is also read by Windows users. I hope that, in the age when Linux is becoming a growing presence on the market, you will not discard this opportunity for continued success.

    PS: Your specific reasons for dropping Linux support has not been clearly stated. Is it a sparkling, new library that’s only available for Windows and Mac OS X as I suspect, or is it simply that you wish to cut the amount of testing you do? If it’s the latter, do note that testing on multiple platforms is one of the most effective way to identify poorly written code that will later show up as bugs on other OSes.

  278. Marcos Apr 4, 2010 6:59 am Permalink

    Please songbird, don’t drop the songbird support

  279. Luuk58 Apr 4, 2010 7:04 am Permalink

    WHAT? ARE YOU F*CKING CRAZY?
    Songbird is the ONLY good iTunes alternative for Linux!

  280. fireburn Apr 4, 2010 7:08 am Permalink

    And nothing of value was lost.

  281. fireburn Apr 4, 2010 7:10 am Permalink

    Thanks for reminding me to delete this thing from my Mac, too!

  282. vinospizza Apr 4, 2010 7:12 am Permalink

    This sucks, I use Songbird on all my operating systems (Win/Mac/Linux). That’s why I liked it – I could use the same program. With that advantage now gone, so I am less likely to put up with its slow startup and occasional buggyness and move on to something else. Boo.

  283. Flander Apr 4, 2010 7:20 am Permalink

    Sad news, but I understand your reasoning.

    What if you still helped a little on the development (coordination, for example), but open source volunteers took up most of the development? What if you asked for financial support. Set a target level of money that would need to be donated for the linux version to continue development?

    I would be very interested in your answers to these quesitons.

    Thank you and best of luck in the future!

  284. Gnu Apr 4, 2010 7:28 am Permalink

    I used Songbird 1.2 for a while on all tree platforms. It was OK and showed promise. But when new version came out, they completely destroyed it, it I immediately removed it. Now I hear this…

    They might make commercial success, because it seems that you have to be a complete jerk to succeed in software industry today, and they just proved they have that requirement.

    But what bothers me is that they try to paint how they support open source ideology… and comments on the announcement showed that nobody believe them on that.

    They said: “our Linux users are some of the most passionate, do some killer development, and always provide tremendous input”. So what exactly is the reason for alienating those people? They do not tell, because truth is probably very ugly.

    They are lost more then they count. This will come back to hunt them.

  285. Computer Repair Beav Apr 4, 2010 7:28 am Permalink

    This is actually the first time I’d ever heard of Songbird and I actually installed it on my Mac – pretty happy with what I’ve seen over the last 10 minutes or so…

    But, even though I’m a Mac user, I’m a FreeBSD/Windows Server/Windows 7 user at work – on a daily basis… I understand the need to drop support for one community, but why don’t you all focus on moving to a platform that supports everything in a one-for-all attitude, like Java? While I can’t stand it myself, it may help your situation…

  286. Vurtuali Apr 4, 2010 7:29 am Permalink

    End of an era.

    I have used and followed Songbird with great enthusiasm over the past few years. A good looking audio player with web browsing built in, that works on linux…excellent. Songbird discontinued on linux…..not excellent, very not excellent.

    I am very very very disapointed.

    I have to agree with the anon poster above about cross platform development.

    What a wonderfully myopic plan… lets drop linux support so we can compete with iTunes on the Mac. Can you tell which way the wind is blowing? I’m sure lord Jobs is extremely helpful with your continued efforts to support the various apple devices. I expect iPad – Songbird compatibility to be coming shortly…not. Play to YOUR strengths, not other peoples.

    See ya laters Songbird, it was nice knowing you.

  287. Hachre Apr 4, 2010 7:33 am Permalink

    Without Linux support Songbird is no longer interesting for me. The only real advantage I’ve always seen is a very iTunes-like interface and support for Linux.

  288. Alex Apr 4, 2010 7:34 am Permalink

    I only run Linux at home and work, now that Songbird is no longer available for Linux I will be moving onto a new music player.

    I originally applauded Songbird for making a great foss alternative to itunes… now I have lots of shame cards to hand out.

    Piss off you sellouts.

    — Lots of Love
    — Alex

  289. Andydread Apr 4, 2010 7:56 am Permalink

    I suspect the reason is because Philips does not intend to support Linux with their players so they encourages SB to drop support. The bottom line is that they sold out to Philips. Philips want video support, Philips wants then to drop Linux support and focus on Video support so that they can have something to compete with Itunes. Apparently Philips wants something with the same features as Itunes including video i suppose. I guess Itunes doesn’t work with their players. This is the only logical reason why they dropped Linux for Mac support. Philips hopes to sell players to Mac fanboys and so since Itunes wont work with philips players on the mac they need this to work on the mac to support their players. Its is a pipe dream on the part of Philips to think Apple drones will even think about purchasing their players instead of Apple branded one. And Philips could have had the good will of the Linux community.

  290. Collin Apr 4, 2010 8:03 am Permalink

    you’ll be missed

  291. Don Apr 4, 2010 8:05 am Permalink

    Well I don’t think I will be using songbird. If you take from a group of people then shut them out wow that is just bad. Your loss.

  292. c.sci.blog Apr 4, 2010 8:18 am Permalink

    Sad way to start the day. If I was using a Mac or Windows, I’d be using iTunes. But I’m using Ubuntu Linux, so that’s the end of the line for Songbird? Too bad…

  293. Ron F. Apr 4, 2010 8:26 am Permalink

    I wish I could say I am surprised, but frankly – it seems somehow expected.

    A word of advice… a partnership with any large commercial enterprise can come to an end with a phone call that you are being dropped -”Bubye.” Whatever enterprises you imagine you have gotten into bed with – can kick you out more easily than you dropped support for the Linux community. Large enterprises often have many projects underway all the time with smaller companies, and they cull these projects periodically. I am suggesting that you might enjoy the rewards of your karma.

    Anyway, enough of that. I want to add my vote to aTunes as a cross-platform music player. I would also mention Jajuk as a player I have used extensively in the past.

    Good bye.

  294. Ruslan Apr 4, 2010 8:26 am Permalink

    Well… bye-bye then.

  295. David Apr 4, 2010 8:33 am Permalink

    I’m sad about this news. I’m a linux guy and I’m using songbird everyday…

  296. dip Apr 4, 2010 8:35 am Permalink

    FAIL!

  297. Luis Apr 4, 2010 8:42 am Permalink

    You could, at least, develop a plugin to connect Amarok to SongBird website. What the developers say about it?

  298. David Lally Apr 4, 2010 8:43 am Permalink

    And I saw so many debates in forums about this being the replacement for Rhythmbox as media player. Heh, well, I guess that will end that silly little debate.

  299. Matt Apr 4, 2010 8:45 am Permalink

    bad call. Seriously, bad call. That’s the nicest way I can put it.

  300. tucker Apr 4, 2010 8:48 am Permalink

    Some loyalty to your Open Source roots. In other words; You intend to let the Linux version slowly bit rot. Rather astounding given the MAC and Linux share a common ancestry.

  301. Markuus Apr 4, 2010 8:56 am Permalink

    Very unfortunate to hear and I’m sure the decision wasn’t easy to make.

    Maybe you can blog in a bit of detail what the big problems with the port are?

  302. Mark Apr 4, 2010 9:03 am Permalink

    Sad as it is, I can appreciate a business not wanting to spend engineering dollars on a product that doesn’t bring in enough revenue to justify it.

    However, here is an idea that may help. Just add Wine to your list of supported Windows platforms – and dedicate some QA resources to this. I would suggest picking one platform like Ubuntu 10.04 and guarantee that you can take a fresh install, run apt-get install wine, and then install your product.

    I don’t see why every software company doesn’t do this!

  303. Alex Apr 4, 2010 9:05 am Permalink

    Hello,

    I’m deeply sorry to hear about that. I’ve been using songbird on Linux since the very beginning.

    And when I say the very beginning, I mean one of the very first public release you made (see I don’t even remember, the version number. it was 0.1 or 0.2, around 2006).

    I don’t clearly understand (neither from your post nor the comments) if their will be a built (but not tested) version of SB in the nighties or if we’ll have to build it from the nighties sources ?

    Whatever, I don’t have time to play this kind of game, I’ll start looking on the Rhythmbox side to see what they have to offer.

    Once again, sorry for you.

    PS : I do hope though that all the conspiracy theoricians I’ve read above are dead wrong or I won’t even be sorry anymore.

  304. jeff Apr 4, 2010 9:14 am Permalink

    You know – I was starting on this whole long rant^H^H^H^H diatribe with a nice story from my past that emphasized how a large “cross-platform” project I worked on years ago got reduced platform-by-platform until it was “well, we’ll support Win16 AND Win32″ – oooooh. be still my heart.

    Anyway, to hell with the story. It all boiled down to, “Well, bugger. This sucks.” Songbird was my last best hope for (peace) maybe possibly someday getting my iPod to work on my Linux box (where all my music lives). So much for that.

  305. Justin Mitchell Apr 4, 2010 9:16 am Permalink

    Well there goes Songbird’s appeal….

  306. fadaken Apr 4, 2010 9:25 am Permalink

    Fail

  307. AR Accident Lawyer Apr 4, 2010 9:30 am Permalink

    That is too bad you are dropping Linux. I know it was a tough decision to make.

  308. Goodbye Apr 4, 2010 9:34 am Permalink

    I’ve been a user for a long time. On my Linux boxes, my Windows box,and my dual-boot Linux/Windows box.

    If you don’t support both, I don’t need you on either one.

    I hope you and Phillips are happy together.

  309. Linux Lover Apr 4, 2010 9:37 am Permalink

    Bye bye songbird. We won’t need it anyway, it might better that way. How much money did you get from Balmer?

  310. Daniel Lyons Apr 4, 2010 9:48 am Permalink

    Open source is dead, folks. Deal with it.

  311. William Lahti Apr 4, 2010 9:50 am Permalink

    ::Shrug::, go ahead and drop support for my operating system of choice. I’ll proceed to drop my support for what was once a promising project but now is clearly going to crap.

  312. Huuh Apr 4, 2010 9:57 am Permalink

    Please reconsider your decision. This can’t be true, must be a joke! Using Songbird on Linux all time.

  313. pop Apr 4, 2010 10:07 am Permalink

    I’m completely disappointed…

  314. Jamesn L Apr 4, 2010 10:19 am Permalink

    It is very sad news, you see, my previous player was XMMS which I dropped for Songbird which in turn has been my favorite player to date

    Today I see with sadness in my heart how I’m calling a terminal and begin to uninstall my favorite player, it’s still useful but without support I simply cannot trust it anymore, you broke my heart. Once I thought I found my true loved player, now I see it flew to the operating system that took me years to leave because of great alternatives in software, here I’m crying songbirds departure, I’ll not recommend it anymore, I wouldn’t speak of it anymore, I wouldn’t love it anymore, I’ll start spreading the word among my friends for them to start removing the betrayal software from their systems.

    Why is it guys you focus on Windows and Mac? Assign more work to Linux/FOSS, yours is a great product! simply drop the other alternatives, and show them how fantastic Songbird really is! shame on you crowded people!

    Hope you guys enjoy songbird on the other side since many of your followers won’t follow you anymore, live well, live long, but please stay away from us since you decided to depart

  315. n8 Apr 4, 2010 10:24 am Permalink

    Wow. What a foolish move. I’ve been following your blog for years now for one reason and one reason only — you were building a credible cross-platform alternative to iTunes. I hope you’ve got some ace killer feature up your sleeve because from where I’m standing it looks like you’ve just dropped the only thing that made your project interesting.

  316. Otis Wildflower Apr 4, 2010 10:29 am Permalink

    Meh. Linux support was the only reason I’d consider not using iTunes in the first place, so I guess that’s that!

    (but then, I gave up years ago when I ran into issues with the iTunes library plugin not being supported in Linux.. Waste of time..)

  317. Strubbl Apr 4, 2010 10:47 am Permalink

    Songbird for Linux!

  318. Val Apr 4, 2010 11:00 am Permalink

    These are people with jobs and salaries. If it doesn’t make sense commercially they shouldn’t continue supporting Linux. End of story.

  319. Tony Apr 4, 2010 11:01 am Permalink

    Listen carefully. Can you hear that? No? – well I’m not surprised – its the sound of Songbird becoming irrelevant.

  320. Josh.yggdrasil@gmail Apr 4, 2010 11:05 am Permalink

    Bummer… SB was my favorite player on Linux. It was all I used, actually.

    I’ll miss you Songbird!

  321. plugin Apr 4, 2010 11:09 am Permalink

    I thought Songbird was a project I could really get behind and support – innovative features, an excellent philosophy, cross-platform and a great API for development. But without Linux support, I’ll have to start looking for an alternative.

  322. Andy Apr 4, 2010 11:22 am Permalink

    This? This is it.

    Carry on chasing the fictitious users in your heads. I’m off to find a music player developed by someone who actually gives a shit about the users they have.

    I will be uninstalling Songbird tonight.

  323. LuisKabuto Apr 4, 2010 11:38 am Permalink

    Bye bye guys, bad news this time, another user that u loose

  324. nadeem Apr 4, 2010 11:47 am Permalink

    thats your choice you dont care about linux so i will not care about your product
    i will remove it

  325. Raphael Apr 4, 2010 11:52 am Permalink

    Sadly, I’ll be another of your users who has to say good-bye now … on Windows as well :-(

  326. esperanto Apr 4, 2010 11:53 am Permalink

    no linux? with the upcomming linux distro’s for netbooks? that really sucks.

  327. Erik Ch Apr 4, 2010 11:56 am Permalink

    90% of the volunteers of Songbird are lovers of Linux (although many do not use as personal desktop).
    Dropping them would drop their biggest army.

    Take a poll in songbird?
    Who here would like to use Linux as your favorite desktop in one day?

  328. Garth Apr 4, 2010 12:00 pm Permalink

    I can’t believe that SB would actually drop Linux support.

    Congratulations, you’ve lost another user on both Windows and Linux.

    One thing you should know, don’t piss off your Linux user base.

  329. lollipop Apr 4, 2010 12:02 pm Permalink

    what about a nice cup of gtfo then. bye.

  330. Yanguang Apr 4, 2010 12:08 pm Permalink

    I believe it is only right to respect the decision of the developers. As much as it saddens me to receive this piece of news, if they deem such a move to be the better of the project in the long run, then that’s that.

    I will take comfort in knowing that should I go back to Windows for my main PC some day, I’ll see it there. Keep up the efforts.

    So long, and thanks for all the fish. ( I’ll wait for fork at least :D )

  331. James Moser Apr 4, 2010 12:09 pm Permalink

    I also was using Songbird on all three platforms. It wasn’t my primary player on Mac or Windows because I was waiting for the player to improve. But now I don’t see the point in using it at all… so I won’t.

  332. Carlos Solís Apr 4, 2010 12:11 pm Permalink

    And do you know what’s next? Phillips closing the source of Songbird. So fork it before it’s too late.

    PS: As you can see, you have earned the unstoppable fury of the Linuxeers and will soon regret it. Good luck trying to get out of that one.

  333. Stephen Apr 4, 2010 12:13 pm Permalink

    This is a shockingly bad move. I’ve been looking for a replacement for Amarok after their version 2 rewrite, and was hopeful Songbird could fill the gap. Plus, I could run it on my Windows box, too! Well, so much for that idea.

    I understand that you have to prioritize and make tough decisions about how to use your resources, but you’re just shooting yourselves in the foot. Without your base of enthusiastic Linux-using supporters, who is going to be recommending Songbird to everyone else?

  334. Erik Ch Apr 4, 2010 12:16 pm Permalink

    Users of Songbird, the majority do not support the Songbird because he has extra features that make it unique.
    90% of users of the songbird, support just because you were giving powers to Linux.
    And only that.

  335. koxmoz kox Apr 4, 2010 12:44 pm Permalink

    jaja, esto es una porquería, no voy a volver a bajar un programa opensource para windows en mi vida, si de todas formas puedo usar programas piratas, y lo segundo ni en linux ni en windows, ahora uso winamp en windows, y exaile en linux·!·!·!·

  336. Jeff Apr 4, 2010 12:49 pm Permalink

    Yep, really dumb. They’ve just alienated their strongest supporters. Bye bye.

  337. justbiz Apr 4, 2010 12:54 pm Permalink

    Hey, I know it’s just business but you said yourself the Linux community is passionate. Songbird is built on the backs of the open source community. Whatever. There are better music players.

  338. verso Apr 4, 2010 12:57 pm Permalink

    I sympathize with sincere disappointment of Linux users – and from what I understand, the SB team is not thrilled about this step either, I’m sure they know it to be a risky one.
    But if I were some of those Linux users that are turning this bad news into a overblown spitting festival, I’d ask myself how have I contributed to the SB project; am I merely a user, recommending SB to my friends, and enjoying a free ride? If that’s the case, I sure can be disappointed, but not completely pissed off, since I’ve spent no time whatsoever contributing to this project. Then I’d say to myself that this just might be the chance to get involved, instead of doing the easiest thing possible – complaining about the neighbor-kid that took away my popsicle.
    And someone’s already mentioned that the Linux community isn’t what it once was – reading some of the comments here I’m starting to almost believe it, since they negate the basic ideology of open source projects, which is, that we all participate in a COMMON substance, CONTRIBUTING to the best of our abilities, knowing that we’re not in a seller-buyer relationship, where we can complain and bitch like your average consumerist.
    If you truly believe in open source then you know that there are no guaranties, projects get dropped, there’s no Big Brother that’s obliged to respond to your wishes, things can go awry, but that’s the freedom you chose.

  339. Zhu Sha Zang Apr 4, 2010 12:58 pm Permalink

    Hey Songbird, welcome to The Collectivity. Resistance is futile.

  340. Jack Apr 4, 2010 1:00 pm Permalink

    Sorry to pile on, but I’m disappointed. Never been able to get a Mac user to try Songbird. A few Windows users, but not many. I sometimes wonder if there are more Mac users or Linux users in the world.

  341. Joe Crawford Apr 4, 2010 1:13 pm Permalink

    I have been a vocal supporter of Songbird. In fact, *every* single person I know who uses Songbird, does so because of my recommendation.

    This is classic “bait and switch”, which I don’t tolerate from any product or company. I am especially bothered because one of the main reasons I recommended it to my friends was because it has Linux support. It is important for me that apps run on at least Windows, Mac OSX, and Linux.

    I am now going to be going back to all of those friends and discouraging the use of Songbird. I will point out all of Songbirds flaws and any features it lacks, and make it clear to my friends that the developers do not respect the wishes of their core community.

    There’s another comment on here the developers ought to reread over and over again:

    >> One thing you should know, don’t piss off your Linux user base.

    Oh yes, especially since, like me, these users are likely to be “tech guru” people for all their friends and family.

    Here’s my advice: Make cross platform support your biggest prioirty, and adjust your timetable for other development as required. Frankly, I’ve written cross platform software for Linux, Windows and Mac OSX…. it’s not that hard.

    Going back to my earlier comment about “Bait and Switch”, please read the following:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_and_switch

    “Bait and Switch” is unacceptable. I would, in fact, go so far as to call it unethical.

  342. Matthew Lenz Apr 4, 2010 1:17 pm Permalink

    Honestly, no big loss. It was always very poor on Linux anyway and was never reliable enough for regular use.

  343. Robert Apr 4, 2010 1:20 pm Permalink

    Bye bye, Songbird. The loyalty doesn’t go both ways. You are now off:

    My Windows computer at work
    My wife’s Mac

  344. Derek Parr Apr 4, 2010 1:31 pm Permalink

    To be honest… I can’t say I care any more. With the last 3-5 releases Songbird has gone from my favourite media player to just another web browser. Them now not actively supporting the operating system I have exclusively used for years really doesn’t matter when there are so many other and better media players out there, and I have since changed to other applications due to Songbirds loss of functionality (what the hell happened to the library in the last release?). Winamp is still the best I’ve ever used (and kudos to the man for what he did then), but Songbird is going in the opposite direction, and there are others taking their own routes in the right direction. Even the Rhythmbox guys are doing it better.. and you know that they can’t be putting as many man hours into it as these Songbird guys are. Embarrassing.

  345. Mike L Apr 4, 2010 1:35 pm Permalink

    I hope you, the developers, can hear the loud ‘whoosh’ of your userbase leaving.

    Bye.

  346. c Apr 4, 2010 1:35 pm Permalink

    I’m an add-on developer and I have to admit I’m really disappointed in this news. I doubt I’ll be able to continue supporting my add-ons because I don’t have a Windows or Mac box to develop and test on.

    Maybe the automated Linux builds will let me version bump my existing add-ons for future Songbird releases, but it’s unlikely I’ll implement any new features. There’s not much point writing an add-on that I can’t use myself. I’ll be looking for a new project to focus my efforts.

  347. tommis Apr 4, 2010 1:44 pm Permalink

    I think i am swiching my default song player from songbird to rhytmbox or amarok becose drobdown o a linux support. :(

  348. ghos Apr 4, 2010 1:54 pm Permalink

    Disappointing. Songbird had recently become my #1 media player due to its versatility and that I could use it on Windows and Linux. Sure I can still use it even after support is dropped, but no new features (except for possible compatibe add-ons).
    I find the other players currently available for Linux either lacking in features or damn ugly to use.
    I do realize its a matter of numbers, Linux is still in the minority of users, though I suppose that is hard to try officially since it isn’t purchased usually.
    Hopefully someone else will pick up the slack and perhaps make it superior to the original, show the SB team they made a big mistake.

  349. Szadek Apr 4, 2010 1:55 pm Permalink

    Well , the player that got known with LINUX , ditching its support for it …..

    you know what ?

    GoodBye … And f**** Y**** traitors

  350. Siggeringalicous Apr 4, 2010 2:05 pm Permalink

    I purchased your tshirts to support your efforts. I contributed what I could back, and am shocked this decision has been made. As a user of mac, windows and linux, I will no longer support any software your company develops.

    songbird fails to earn my respect.

  351. A Nyoni Apr 4, 2010 2:06 pm Permalink

    Not that i matter, but i this is the sad day for me. i moved to ubuntu because of songbird, and now i am being droped this is disappointment. i now know how it feels thanks its been a good ride time to move, i will no longer use this program and or check your site daily like i used too. good bye

  352. ACMiller Apr 4, 2010 2:10 pm Permalink

    Wow, feels like a swift kick in the balls after 3 years of using songbird as my primary music player. I must say, as a linux user, there is nothing worse than using a program no longer under active development, so it’s difficult to see the current (buggy) version of Songbird sticking around on my computer for much longer without updates.

    I imagine that with this Songbird will lose most of it’s addon developers. Interesting move, considering that until very recently the website mentioned something along the lines of the community being the heart of this project. Community involvement and the cross-platform nature of the program were core to this project… without those this project is pretty much empty. I can’t see this move having any positive impact on the future of Songbird whatsoever.

  353. Joe Crawford Apr 4, 2010 2:25 pm Permalink

    To anyone who, like me, is considering forking songbird…

    I think what is really important is to get a fork going that is not just Linux specific, but is cross platform in the same way that songbird always was. The goal would be to always be at least as good or better than the current version of songbird, in every way.

    This way, we can continue to move forward. I imagine also that many songbird contributors and extension authors would be interested in such a fork, and would likely support it over the official one.

  354. GreyGeek Apr 4, 2010 2:30 pm Permalink

    Do all you folks who contributed to the development of Songbird realize what has happened? You’ve been EXPLOITED. Songbird adds its name to a list of companies run by folks who lack ethics or morals.

    The pattern is simple. Announce an “Open Source” project, persuade FOSS volunteers to contribute code, documentation, i18n translations, graphics, bug reporting and beta testing. When most of the bugs are worked out, the documentation written, the most popular languages are included, and the features polished, THEN use the FOSS code base to extend the code base for Windows, leaving Linux and the FOSS suckers behind. sell the resulting binary for $$$ under restrictive EULAS, and DON’T share anything with the Linux community which gave so much. Oh, they WON’T forget to copyright all the contributed code, documentation and translations as “THEIR” work.

    The key symptom to watch for is when the FOSS version begins to lag significantly behind the proprietary version. For FOSS contributors that’s your first sign that you are being used and abused.

    The solution is easy. At the point when the “FOSS” version drops behind a proprietary version by so much as a single feature, THAT is the point where interested FOSS developers either cease contributing OR FORK the source code and continue on their own as a new FOSS project, keeping all their developments under the GPL. That’s what should happen with the GPL source of Songbird, IF there are enough FOSS contributors to create a healthy project.

    For those who use other FOSS projects and notice the same kind of deceptions being employed as were demonstrated by Songbird management, if you can fork it, quit it. Don’t support it.

    (BTW, Bill Gates added a LOT of features to Win95 by taking BSD code, but he NEVER contributed any code BACK to the BSD project.)

  355. 3po Apr 4, 2010 2:33 pm Permalink

    “we should discontinue support for the Linux version of Songbird”…
    You will kill a big part of your community.

  356. Mike Apr 4, 2010 2:39 pm Permalink

    Yup, this will be the death of songbird as we know it. I guarantee 90% of the people who use this program use it because it runs on linux AND windows/mac. Thats why I started using it, now I only use linux, so goodbye songbird, Amarok2 works well enough now.

  357. Clamm Apr 4, 2010 2:52 pm Permalink

    To MOST COMMENTERS out here… thats just not fair! I believe we all shared a dream which was now put to the ground of reality. Also called “real-wolrd-business” or also so called… “getting the money to pay the bills”. Actually we should be sad and not angry. I am sure the developers of songbird whished there would be another option. Yes make a fork… Yes, you can do that in YOUR free time. But they need to earn money to survive in the hard battle against a giant called iTunes. That’s the point! So calm down and don’t say it was an evil plan! It was a dream which came down to the ground of reality!

  358. The internet Apr 4, 2010 3:06 pm Permalink

    So Who paid/threatened the songbird team to ensure the hatchet job on linux support, Microsoft or Apple? And how much money did it take ?

  359. Paulo Sérgio Miguel Apr 4, 2010 3:13 pm Permalink

    had already noticed that Songbird was abandoning the Linux when it stopped to sync the iPod and greatly decreases its use. Now I will never use it, I will withdraw my notebook. Goodbye Sondbird.

  360. Dirk Apr 4, 2010 3:29 pm Permalink

    No more Songbird for Linux because you can’t maintain it?

    Dudes? rly? U FAILED

  361. Feh Apr 4, 2010 3:37 pm Permalink

    Loosers, morons, assholes, fuckers, Linux kicks ass.
    Lousy Apple/ Microsoft loving pricks, kiss my ass!

  362. The internet Apr 4, 2010 3:46 pm Permalink

    Clamm YOU need to put your assumptions “to the ground of reality”. Yes this was more than likely a business decision. There was no way on earth however, that it was for the good of the project and its users, which for an Open Source project should be the first and deciding consideration when making any decision about the direction of the project (such as dropping support for a particular platform) regardless of whether or not it supports or is supported by a business model. Any open source project that holds any claim to the title, and is to remain freely licensed, is built on its philosophy, once it gives that up there is nothing that sets it or its paid developers apart from those in proprietary software. The outcry being displayed in these comments is NOT poorly informed criticism as you seem to assume, but honest and justified anger by a user base who subscribe to the philosophy claimed by the development team and have been, albeit so far mildly, betrayed for the sake of convenience.

    Any developer who feels they cannot make a comfortable living developing open code, or more importantly, is not able to donate time and effort to an open source project when pursuing such a living (particularly those with families and dependents) is under no obligation to do so and should not be criticised for the effects of circumstances outside their control. If they are able and willing to do so however, and even better if they are able to build a sustainable and ethically conducted business model around open code, their efforts will ALWAYS be demonstrably appreciated by users and contributors alike.

    Anger at the unethical treatment of both users and developers of software is one of the very emotions that motivated the genesis of both the free, and open source software movements. Sadness is an emotion best reserved for lost opportunities, not ones taken away out of malice and in the name of making money, and since ‘Pioneers of the Inevitable’ (the limited company behind songbird) seem by available evidence to be following the often used pattern ‘develop product, monetize later’, there can be absolutely no guaranteed transparency of their intentions toward users or volunteer developers.

    Put simply, reality itself is not based entirely on business. A great number of the most important, and essential free and open software products used by business, had absolutely no business involvement in their initial development, and some still do not, and they are a reality. Therefore applying the term “real-world-business” to any argument over an open source project is an entirely erroneous statement.

  363. Daniel Hansen Apr 4, 2010 4:37 pm Permalink

    Well, rhythmbox always suited me anyway

  364. George Apr 4, 2010 5:01 pm Permalink

    Songbird was my favorite music player. Now I have to find another.

    If you abandon me, I’ll abandon you. Simple as that.

  365. Kyran Apr 4, 2010 5:22 pm Permalink

    :’(

  366. Alpha1beta Apr 4, 2010 5:52 pm Permalink

    So this is how the last decent cross platform media player dies?
    What can I or We do to help keep it alive?

  367. Feh Apr 4, 2010 6:01 pm Permalink

    Oh look what blog is afraid of bad comments, I have posted 2 other comments and they were deleted.
    Feh tells you that the songbird developers not only dont give a crap about open source but free speech!
    Its a crappy program anyway, and most of the linux players out there are 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times better then songbird.
    Kiss my big fat arse songbird, long live linux!

  368. wookiehangover Apr 4, 2010 6:15 pm Permalink

    This is profoundly stupid.

    If you think that you could actually have penetration in Mac and Windows, or at least have a chance to be competitive in those markets, you’re fucking crazy.

    Linux is where you’re most needed, and turning your back on the Linux community is a big mistake :(

  369. Volt Apr 4, 2010 6:26 pm Permalink

    If I can only use Songbird on platforms that iTunes already supports, why would I gimp myself?

    May you sink quickly.

  370. Mone Apr 4, 2010 6:31 pm Permalink

    :.-(

  371. xxxx Apr 4, 2010 6:59 pm Permalink

    How do you do something like that!!! I thing Songbird is the best player for Linux!!! It’s the closest to iTunes but better! So how you dare!!! I use Songbird and fallow it since the project even doesn’t have a release, and this is news are really devasting!

  372. Sqlpython Apr 4, 2010 7:15 pm Permalink

    Shot yourselves in the foot. You are underestimating the Multi OS user base.
    As a 15 year LINUX user and Linux developer I am very disappointed. I choose my Desktop apps because they are both Powerful and work across Several OSes..LINUX, BSD, Mac and Windows. LINUX and BSD are my primary OSes.
    I don’t want a Desktop app that cannot work across OSes. If I am representative of most multi OS users then Songbird will lose a significant user base.
    ….Amarok is excellent. I had previously used Amarok for years and it has LINUX, BSD, Win & Mac versions for many many Languages. It was difficult to leave Amarok behind and it will be easy to go back to using Amarok.

  373. Aus Apr 4, 2010 7:21 pm Permalink

    To answer some recurring flamebait comments:

    * No, no one paid us off to ditch Linux.
    * No, Philips did not ask us in any way, shape or form to drop Linux.
    * We are not closing the source to Songbird. It will remain an open platform.
    * We are maintaining our Linux build infrastructure and will ensure that it continues to compile and run the unit-test suite.
    * We have a lot of folks in house that use Linux every day and they will keep developing Songbird on Linux.
    * The majority of our add-on developers and contributors use Windows as their primary OS.
    * Most of our bug reports come in from users that use Windows.
    * We are not exploiting anyone that happens to use Linux and has filed bug reports, translated portions of Songbird or written add-ons. Anyone assuming that’s the case is mistaken, plain and simple.
    * Songbird is not distributed as part of any distribution currently because our dependencies do not line up with default versions distros ship with.
    * Our usage numbers are based on active user count which has nothing to do with downloads.

    All of your angry comments are not constructive in any way. I thank the few reasonable folks who have replied to the barrage of hate. We are very grateful for your support.

    This was never an easy decision for us but we simply do not have the QA and development resources to continue officially supporting Linux.

    For the high and mighty out there that think that we receive tons of development help from Linux developers, I hate to disappoint you but that’s just not true. We’ve received less than 30 patches (mostly small changes, which we still love BTW, keep those coming) in 5 years. Most of those patches were contributed by Windows and Mac developers.

  374. Carlos Killpack Apr 4, 2010 7:27 pm Permalink

    Well, thanks for nothing. I really love Songbird and the FOSS ideals that it stands for but (as a linux user) I never felt that the dev team put any effort into the truly amazing software that I was using. And even though it isn’t feature complete I’ve found that Amarok is better.

    When I started using songbird I was excited at the prospect of having some good device support on linux (in addition to all of the unique things that songbird has to offer) and its definitely not on the list of software I recommend to people anymore.

  375. Foolishgrunt Apr 4, 2010 7:54 pm Permalink

    @ The Internet (I can’t believe I just said that):

    Open source means just what it sounds like: the source code is open to the public, and free to be edited and redistributed. By making the source code available to the public, POTI have already fulfilled any “philosophical obligation” they may have had to the term “open source.” Any further sense of “idealism” is completely up to them to decide: they never once signed a contract that said they would continue to support development on the GNU/Linux platform.

    Just because Songbird is an open source project doesn’t mean it’s forbidden to be profitable. That’s not an oxymoron, it’s just a different business plan. I’d be willing to bet that the revenue brought in by partnership deals with other companies (such as Qtrax and Phillips) are a big part of why Songbird has reached the level of success it has today. Being able to employ a staff of full-time developers is what sets apart a lot of the most successful players (iTunes, Winamp, WMP, etc) and so far it’s also been what sets Songbird apart from other open source media players. It’s been built into an incredibly feature-rich player, in less time than Banshee and way less time than Rhythmbox.

    Bottom line: you have no right to act like you’ve been betrayed. POTI is a company, and they have to do what’s best for them in order to reach their main target audience, or else they won’t continue. Like it or not, Windows users are a much bigger target audience than Linux users.

  376. Alex Apr 4, 2010 8:17 pm Permalink

    @Foolishgrunt

    “Just because Songbird is an open source project doesn’t mean it’s forbidden to be profitable. ”

    It’s great that Songbird is profitable, only problem is that you can’t make money on something thats not yours. In truth the community is the owner.

    Example: RedHat… Redhat doesn’t charge you for linux, they charge you for the support services and pre-built binary packages behind it.

    You can’t use the work of tireless open source developers and trash some of code based on it’s lack of “profitability”. This is not the way to run a healthy open source project and I definitely see a fork (in the source and the community) in SongBird’s future.

    Freebird anyone? :)

  377. Alex Apr 4, 2010 8:21 pm Permalink

    @aus:

    “* We have a lot of folks in house that use Linux every day and they will keep developing Songbird on Linux.”
    .
    .
    “For the high and mighty out there that think that we receive tons of development help from Linux developers, I hate to disappoint you but that’s just not true. We’ve received less than 30 patches”

    Those statements conflict a little guy.

  378. Aus Apr 4, 2010 8:25 pm Permalink

    @Alex

    The patches I’m referring to come from developers that are not Songbird employees.

  379. Jason Apr 4, 2010 8:32 pm Permalink

    Don’t lie, don’t think your users are stupid.

    The only reason to drop Linux support, is because your backers told you to. Phillips holds the money bag and you’ve got to dance to their tune.

    I understand you’ve got to put food on the table and whatever, but you need to understand that you’ve basically just taken a giant crap on your fan base.

    I hope you are all happy with your decision.

  380. David Newall Apr 4, 2010 9:02 pm Permalink

    Is that a linux powered Nokia N900 mobile that I spy most prominently positioned in front of all of the other mobile devices displayed on your home page?

  381. PhrostByte Apr 4, 2010 9:27 pm Permalink

    Please tell me this is a late April Fool’s joke.. Linux NEEDS SongBird!

  382. Nick Apr 4, 2010 9:37 pm Permalink

    So sad I really liked songbird. I am removing it now …

  383. Foolishgrunt Apr 4, 2010 9:50 pm Permalink

    @ Alex:

    You’re again missing the meaning of the term “open source.” Releasing the source code of a piece of software does not surrender all legal rights to it; intellectual property and copyright laws still apply. Songbird is undeniably the intellectual property of the POTI developers who wrote the code for it, and as such they control the direction of the project. No user-submitted patch will ever find it’s way into the main branch unless it’s approved by POTI, because they’re the only ones allowed to publish a piece of software under the name “Songbird.” Even software available under strong copyleft licenses such as the GNU GPL are, by definition, copyrighted. Look it up if you don’t believe me.

    And about Red Hat… if what you were saying were true, they would allow free Enterprise Linux downloads and charge ONLY for their support services. But that’s clearly not the case. Red Hat does charge a subscription fee before allowing any download of their Enterprise Linux title. This is legal because large portions of the code for that OS was actually produced by the Red Hat Inc employees. That makes them the copyright owner of that particular distribution, and they’re free to charge for it if they please.

  384. Kasuo Apr 4, 2010 10:19 pm Permalink

    In my opinion, this is a shame and a lost. I really loved Songbird for the cross-compatibly. But I’m not angry – I completely understand.

    Will you be keeping the latest source available? Maybe we (AKA the users/developers) of the Linux community can port the latest version for you while updating for the common distros.

    Please – let us help you. It’s the least we can do for this great player. We’re all not like the whiners that some of these posters display us as.

  385. sambatyon Apr 4, 2010 10:26 pm Permalink

    Let me get this straight, so you’re basic ditching the only platform were you are relevant. That’s a good way to do business… congrats!

  386. hoeltgman Apr 4, 2010 10:44 pm Permalink

    No Linux Support? Fine. I just uninstalled Songbird on all my machines. Linux and Windows. Just remember that for Windows, there are alternatives that are much better than Songbird. Your advantage was the fact that you were cross plattform and that people had a homogenuous way to experience their music throughout different operating systems.

  387. yikes Apr 4, 2010 11:17 pm Permalink

    Ouch. This is disappointing and depressing — I’ve never particularly cared for Amarok, Rhthymbox, etc., and the the first three things I always added to my desktop Linux installs were VLC, Songbird, and Audacity in that order.

    I understand the need to retain focus and prioritize effectively, but I could care less about which smartphones Songbird has been ported to — are that many more users really using SB on phones than on (non-phone) Linux distros?

  388. Mark Hewitt Apr 4, 2010 11:41 pm Permalink

    Stunning. Just stunning, guys. Well, Linux users have gotten pretty used to being ignored and neglected by this development team, this shouldn’t come as a suurprise. But watching Songbird turn from a great, innovative open source project to a slow, broken, corporate-funded extravaganza that spend more time on shiny new skins and selling itself than making a great product – and then being dumped wholesale? Whoop-de-sodding-doo, guys. I hate to add to the cavalcade of hate but I’m bitter – I spent day after day after day finding a music player that did almost everything I wanted, and then hundreds more hours struggling with and working around its many holes. giving feedback on the boards and voting as well as encouraging my friends to use it – and now I’ve been dumped. On that basis I’m going to permit myself a childish moment: I hope Apple eat you up and spit you out.

  389. peter Apr 4, 2010 11:46 pm Permalink

    shame on you !!! it’s really not that hard to support Linux.

    You’re better off firing that new MBA !)(&#! that you just hired.

  390. Clemens Eisserer Apr 5, 2010 12:26 am Permalink

    Well in the long term you’ll only hurt yourself with this descision, because Songbird uses its attribute “true cross-platform” – which is quite an important descision element these days.

  391. Graham Weldon Apr 5, 2010 12:33 am Permalink

    I wonder how many of you that are complaining now are users that have never contributed either financially or through product support and development.

    This happens to open source projects all over the place. Pre-empt project closure, by supporting your favourite open source projects through donations, publicity, help with development and support.

  392. selketh Apr 5, 2010 12:35 am Permalink

    Goodbye Song bird !!!

  393. Miro Hadzhiev Apr 5, 2010 12:54 am Permalink

    I can’t believe it. Is this a 1-st April fool? You drop Linux for Windows (and Mac OS)…. Unbelievable! Now it is the time you to do so and with Firefox and Thunderbird and so long to Mozilla!

    We are the people which give you the needed and indispensable feed-back and bug reports. Without us you are lost.

    And I wanna say something even more: Google Chrome is the better browser but I keep using Firefox only because I believe in Mozilla and do NOT WANT to abandon it!

    You give me a pretty good reason to start using Chrome and letting Google devour you. You decide which users are more important to you!

  394. senshu Apr 5, 2010 2:08 am Permalink

    @Miro Hadzhiev and others

    Songbird is not developed by Mozilla.
    It just uses the same technology as Firefox.

  395. Alex Apr 5, 2010 2:12 am Permalink

    @Miro Hadzhiev (and some others)

    You’re making a confusion the songbird developpers are *not* the mozilla (firefox/thunderbird/…) developpers.

    Songbird is *based* on mozilla platform/framework (you name it …) it has nothing to do with mozilla (afak)

  396. LnxSlck Apr 5, 2010 2:13 am Permalink

    Good ridance! Your software is crap, such a memory hog with no support for apple ishuffle

  397. haaja Apr 5, 2010 2:14 am Permalink

    First ipod support, now this. Well I guess this was a fun ride.. Goodbye!

  398. fu Apr 5, 2010 2:29 am Permalink

    No Linux support = no Songbird support. Good luck!

  399. hooj choons Apr 5, 2010 2:35 am Permalink

    That little logo of yours used to represent something fun, something unique, something clever…and now, without Linux support, it represents nothing but disappointment. Sheer and utter disappointment! A lack of metacity support really bothered me anyway..This is me removing Songbird from my Linux system and my Windows system.

  400. Jed Apr 5, 2010 2:42 am Permalink

    Sad news for me and undoubtly a for you tough decison to make but as Linux goes, there’s plenty of choice to choose from…

    sudo apt-get remove songbird

  401. vistakiller Apr 5, 2010 2:45 am Permalink

    400 comments in one day….!!

  402. kanye Apr 5, 2010 2:50 am Permalink

    The Songbird image is crumbling fast! Banshee and Amarok are looking pretty good to me!

    sudo apt-get remove songbird

    http://amarok.kde.org/
    http://banshee-project.org/

  403. crego Apr 5, 2010 2:58 am Permalink

    Huge mistake to stop supporting Linux. What are you thinking? Or are you not thinking?

  404. Thiago Apr 5, 2010 3:03 am Permalink

    Sad news, I like song bird and use only Linux, so bye bye Songbird for me now… at least Banshee is improving

    But you guys should think better, I understand the difficulties, but if the open source projects you use would stop supporting windows?

  405. Jonas Obrist Apr 5, 2010 3:18 am Permalink

    Epic fail and goodbye songbird

  406. Rick Apr 5, 2010 3:53 am Permalink

    Awesome! Songbird is really good at dropping support for suff. First it dropped support for iPod now Linux. It’s getting better and better. I think if Songbird would drop Audio support next it would become a real kick ass player

  407. juan Apr 5, 2010 3:53 am Permalink

    You SB guys sound like a person trying to explain the good reasons to have killed your father …

    But it’s your business. Time to look for another player …

  408. Wil Palen Apr 5, 2010 4:06 am Permalink

    Amateur coders…

    Or is it just the need to go commercial and cash in?

  409. stormpack Apr 5, 2010 4:17 am Permalink

    WOW.

    I thought you wouldn’t be as stupid as this but you guys surprised me.

    It’s the only damn place you have a considerable amount of loyal users and you’re going to drop it?

    Do you know what open-source means?

    Have a nice fail. Lets find another player.

  410. Kopfgeldjaeger Apr 5, 2010 4:18 am Permalink

    Oh maaan… I tried Songbird a few days ago, and it had a lotta potential – but the linux version didn’t seem very good. Now this. Great! “So you’re now providing an iTunes alternative, but only on the platforms that iTunes runs on?” <- full ACK

  411. alex Apr 5, 2010 4:28 am Permalink

    Sooo… great.
    Your dev team seems to suck. First you break songbird, then aw, lets drop linux support. These guys cant do anything to us.
    That’s the problem when a company develops open source :) First it gets bloat, then it gets commercial, dropping free platforms.

    I prefer not to support you in any way then, uninstalling sb on all pcs

    Expect closed source songbird, with only windows support soon :) Also, let it install genuine advantage with it.

  412. sque Apr 5, 2010 4:28 am Permalink

    Emotionally: disappointed, betrayed, pissed off
    Logically: Never trust a company. Companies are here for ONLY ONE reason… money! Whatever face they wear, it is worn to make more money.

    Conclusion: Use your brain not your emotions when choosing software.

  413. Jigar shah Apr 5, 2010 4:29 am Permalink

    And SB achieves another milestone. More that 400 comments for the first time on blog. I remember on 1.0 launch they had around 300+. Good work guys. I know i have no rights to say anything. I don’t sponsor SB development neither i create patch for Linux SB. But did quite a bit of QA. Yeh..thts community. Any words from frenchbirds…??

  414. Tiao Apr 5, 2010 4:32 am Permalink

    A lot of bullshit.

    >> We remain loyal to Linux and the ideology it represents

    This is a excuse, to use the bot and say: “Oh, we have a Linux built, that it means a heartache. It will not work, doesn’t have features, but we are still opensource”…ahhhh…bullshit again

    Just drop the support of linux then…

  415. arifin Apr 5, 2010 4:47 am Permalink

    i came from indonesia…
    it’s sad to hear that songbird was drop form linux.
    good bye songbird…
    hope you make a right decision to you future..

  416. vistakiller Apr 5, 2010 4:51 am Permalink

    I think you must tell to philips that all of us we are customers. I never buy again a philips product.

  417. vistakiller Apr 5, 2010 5:03 am Permalink

    The last thing that we cant do is to boikotaz the philips products and never again say a good think to friends etc about philips and their product
    The dont like open source and open source community and is simple we will never get money for us.
    Thera are much better companies like Lg,Samsung and most of their products run linux.

  418. mark Apr 5, 2010 5:17 am Permalink

    Well, SB was my cross-plattform media player for Windows & Linux. With Windows alone I can stay with the media player I used there the last years, so…
    it was nice to meet you, I had high hopes…
    BTW: I don’t care for video support in my audio player, I just want an audio player who is good in his core assets (and cross plattform). When I want video I take a video player.
    I guess I’m not alone with this opinion.

  419. Petar Apr 5, 2010 5:19 am Permalink

    As a SB user on all three platforms I can do nothing but drop my support for SB on Windows & Mac by uninstalling its respective versions. The hypocritical speech given about priorities, development and ideology is offensive to anyone in their right mind. Please, do continue to harvest FLOSS efforts for your own commercial gain.
    “How do you sleep at night? – On top of a pile of money with many beautiful women on it.”

  420. Xtian Xultz Apr 5, 2010 5:26 am Permalink

    Can I made a suggestion?

    What about writing an article explaining why it is hard to maintain a cross platform project like Songbird (probably it´s obvious for the dev team, but bot for other developers who doesn’t work with cross platform projects), the main pitfalls, and some suggestions to improve Linux at all to be more cross-dev friendly.

  421. boon Apr 5, 2010 5:30 am Permalink

    you guys suck BIG TIME…
    sorry but i can see you in 1 year, not existing anymore.

    “NOFX” ? more like “good riddance”

  422. Sidney Apr 5, 2010 5:53 am Permalink

    Songbird is the best player for Linux. =/
    “Eloi Eloi Lama Sabachthani!!!”

  423. Anonymous Apr 5, 2010 5:59 am Permalink

    Well.. Looks like I won’t be using Songbird anytime soon. They can go support their closed source OS’s. Wonder who accepted the bribe to take this path? Good riddance, plenty of other substitutes out there that will remain Linux friendly. Suggest everyone go tell these guys where to shove it. Oh and no, you don’t remain loyal to Linux if you remove support. You aren’t, period.

  424. Jeremy Apr 5, 2010 6:03 am Permalink

    Wow. I’ve kept track of Songbird since its pre-public-alpha days…it has come a long way in development since then, but to drop Linux support seems contrary to the project’s original goals. Why should songbird even be based on a cross-platform project and all the dev hours poured into compatibility across various builds be wasted?

  425. Alex Apr 5, 2010 6:20 am Permalink

    @Aus

    Fair enough… I still see a fork in the community and sources though.

  426. Mez Apr 5, 2010 6:24 am Permalink

    I don’t think it deserved to be codenamed NOFX while at the same time dropping Linux support, then. If you take NOFX as a reference, then your app shoud be awesome. But without any Linux support, it just becomes another mediocre app, limiting its perspective and its interest, and above all its independent perspective (which has always been NOFX choice). Please, change it right now, it is a real insult to NOFX.

  427. icarus Apr 5, 2010 6:27 am Permalink

    This realy sucks! I use and love Songbird because it’s crossplattform.

    Without Linux support I will definitly stop using Songbird on Windows and on Linux. This was a realy good Project and I’m said it’s over.

    Perhaps some day another Player will fill the gap.

  428. Goodbye Apr 5, 2010 6:30 am Permalink

    “This was never an easy decision for us but we simply do not have the QA and development resources to continue officially supporting Linux.”

    There are ways to deal with this problem other than dropping part of your userbase via a blog post.

    See Fedora, OpenSuse, Mozilla Messaging.

    You try to build an open source community to maintain the port.

  429. Eduardo Silva Apr 5, 2010 6:35 am Permalink

    Goodbye songbird!

    root@hades:~# apt-get remove songbird
    Reading package lists… Done
    Building dependency tree
    Reading state information… Done
    The following packages will be REMOVED:
    songbird
    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
    After this operation, 52.8MB disk space will be freed.
    Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
    (Reading database … 291746 files and directories currently installed.)
    Removing songbird …
    Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils …
    Processing triggers for libc-bin …
    ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
    root@hades:~#

  430. Humbertus Apr 5, 2010 6:36 am Permalink

    I’m deeply disappointed by the developers, and seriously I think you are doing a bad step for the project itself.

    Now let’s see if good people are going to fork it.
    At least there are other cross-platform players on the horizon: http://jajuk.info

  431. Osama Khalid stauts Apr 5, 2010 6:37 am Permalink

    [...]Rhythmbox has always been an excellent music player for me.[...]

  432. p Apr 5, 2010 6:45 am Permalink

    “Some of you may wonder how a company with deep roots in Open Source could drop Linux”

    Yes indeed some of us are wondering…

    You re stopping support for the one os that is open source and follows a model that allowed you to grow on the first place.
    Already before I could see there was not much consideration towards linux users within the getsatisfaction.com pages, where on the same topic the windows users would have answers when linux users where simply ignored.

    So with this fact alone plus “missing” features I, as a linux user, understood that I wasnt part of the “priority”. And I could understand the point.
    But going as far as stopping development and support, I havent seen this coming and I feel its a very hypocrit and ungratefull decision.

    The users of the least known os are again not well considered but this time it’s songbird that stop giving a shit about those users. Songbird that is, the “free and open media player that works with all modern web services” songbird were “since 2006 thousands of open source developers have contributed, by writing code, adding new features…”.

    So in term of time/money it might be a clever move but it doesnt give a nice message to the people using open source os and software.

    Personaly I wont use songbird anymore if there is no support. Will there be some version sustained by the community? What media player will we use from now on? Its not sonbird s company problem anymore, it s my own “minority” problem now.

    Of course its no big deal, there are many media players
    and even if i liked songbird i mean there is no major crisis here. And as many others people I m not that stupid and I have no problem understanding the problems of cross platform deveploment.

    So why am i a bit pissed? It s the “we regret” speech that sounds really lame and hypocrit. If it breaks you heart as it seems it is then dont do it.
    At least a more honest and less obscure explanation would have been better: like the description of your “priorities” that arent stated anywhere.
    Something like: “there is not enough linux users, we re a company and have no money to put in linux version anymore because our goal isnt to provide a cross platform media player that everybody can use but to eat as much marketshare as possible.”
    And beeing completely straightforward might go by “now the project is well on its way we dont need linux community support anymore” even though its just a guess…

    So good luck trying to kill winamp and itunes as it seems the point is… as a user there s no point for me having differents player for different platform and will start using something different from no on…. goodbye songbird it was probably a clever move, but you get no congatulations for the compromise and the hypocrisy.

  433. Dylan Apr 5, 2010 7:00 am Permalink

    Songbird might as well just go proprietary now since the source will be useless to Linux users as its gonna be missing so much Linux stuff. Users of Win/Mac don’t even care about the source being available.

    As a developer myself I can’t really see how this decision was made. Do ye guys realize how big a hole ye dug for the project?? Songbird will lose alot of testers, bug reporters and definitely lose contributors/developers.

  434. Dave Apr 5, 2010 7:16 am Permalink

    Unbelievable. I was a HUGE supporter of what Songbird was about when it launched. I have been using it since then on Ubuntu through the getdeb packages and on Windows. When you removed the iPod support it didn’t matter to me because I would never purchase such a closed off player, but other friends and family had them so it was great that they had a decent Linux option. So, I started planting the seeds to consider a different player next go ’round.

    Now you are dropping support for the Linux platform and I ask what do you really have to offer? Seriously, you are now just another media player out there. Being based on Mozilla technology you boot slow, are still buggy, and can’t hit release targets. Woo-hoo…

    You may want to reconsider your position before it is too late. Oh, and I agree with Dylan’s position, you may as well close up the source. Linux users are about the only ones who care about that anyway so it is no longer a selling point. In fact many perceive OSS to be sub quality due to their ignorance, but those are your exclusive end users. Have fun.

  435. bad Apr 5, 2010 7:17 am Permalink

    Brutal. Good luck with that.

  436. p Apr 5, 2010 7:27 am Permalink

    Even though i m obviously not happy with the decision (see my other post) I dont think songbird team will loose so many testers, bug reporters, contributors and so on…

    Linux users are still a very small minority and most of the contributors must be windows users. After all the “spirit community” isnt linux monopol and surely many windows or mac users also contribute in various ways.

    So all the angry posts talking about “songbird shooting oneself in the foot” are probably overestimating the linux users contributions in term of ratio.

    Still Songbird is not gonna be “crossplatform” anymore… if there is a harmfull consequence coming out from this decision that should be the loss of this “feature”. And franquly i dont feel like its gonna be a problem for people not concerned which means more than 95% of the people.

    Finaly, looking at all the insults written here, we can all see that linux users arent better behaved than the others in average. Its a bit sad considering the values that are supposed to be carried by the free software world…

    Insulting or shouting “long live linux” might make one s feel like some kindof heroic war resistance guy but to me it sound more like somebody unable to respect others when he s safe behind is computer screen. It s so pitifull to see this kind of behavior isnt improving. Especially on a topic so trifling as a media player port.

    (Im also a linux user btw)

  437. Tom Apr 5, 2010 7:40 am Permalink

    Sad news. The decision to drop linux and convert songbird from a great multiplattform musicplayer to another videoplayer for win/mac makes me sad.

    But developers have all the right to decide what they want to do.

    Thanks for the opportunity to have a real good multiplattform song player until today.

  438. rioneqf Apr 5, 2010 7:46 am Permalink

    First they will call for your OpenSource spirit to contribute..then they will catch Linux user’s and dev with a “shinning project” so they can get a good code and plug-ins from/with the community, slowly they’ll be able to move to Windows/OSX ignoring you..and at the end they’ll just told you they can’t support any longer those that made you grow….

    Do you really thing you will be able to grow against the free options of Winamp I-tunes and Real Player in Windows/Mac?What a great vision!! :P

    RIP Songbird.(emerge -C songbird-bin)

  439. Patrick Apr 5, 2010 7:46 am Permalink

    So … Linux is now in the same support category that Windows 7 has been in? I can live with that.

    All these comments are totally psychotic. Songbird is still missing a lot of features that are important to me, so I don’t use it that much. Yet. But I think it continues to be an important and promising project.

  440. Darryl Apr 5, 2010 7:52 am Permalink

    Well, with this news, I have to say that I’ll be uninstalling Songbird on both my Windows and Linux computers. I’m really really disappointed that Linux is being dropped and basically tossed out. Songbird to me was an excellent example of a cross-platform software. Now they’re no better than MS or Apple.
    Good bye SB.

  441. katana346 Apr 5, 2010 8:24 am Permalink

    Wow…. that’s alot of comments. I’ve been staying out of this so far, just watching the hurt and dejected comments roll in. I feel I have to say something, as a sort of devil’s advocate.

    I have, like many of you, been with Songbird since the first release. I have watched development much like a child watching the nest in the tree outside of his window (not to say I haven’t offered the little chicks some food every now and again; I’ve bought quite a few shirts for myself and gifts). I celebrated the first flight, encouraged many others to take up birdwatching, and recently, watched the little birds make new nests for themselves with suspicious mates. These nests seem to be much more private than I would like, and now it seems that one of the birds has died, which saddens me greatly. But as much as it saddens me and as much as I can sympathize with Linux users (Ive been watching out the Window, so to speak), I have to understand that sometimes these things happen.

    I don’t know a whole lot about programming and development beyond the basics, but I do know that where there are limited resources, sometimes priorities need to be made. Was this the right bird to exclude? Idk… I would have to say that there are certainly many angles to consider, and that I don’t know enough to really say. My opinion is that this was a bad decision, but that’s just opinion; there aren’t a whole lot of hard facts. I honestly don’t believe there is any conspiracy with Phillips or M$ or anything like that; that’s just silly. I think they made a judgment call, and a difficult one at that.

    I have a lot of thoughts, but I think I’m gonna leave my rant at that…. Feel free to respond with anger or whatever emotion you may feel: Vent.

  442. Alex Apr 5, 2010 9:01 am Permalink

    @All the insulting posts
    (from a Linux-only user)

    being a vocal minority doesn’t give you the right to be that arrogant and insulting

    Yes I’m very sad of the decision to drop Linux support, yes I hope for a fork (without video support in my audio player), but no we have no right to insult people because of that.

    On an other topic (“you’re loosing your biggest supporting community”,”shooting on the foot”,…). No they’re not (or maybe they are, we *don’t* know, vocal minority are too often making/faking numbers out of nothing). We must stay aware that Linux is still a tiny small part of computer community so when someone says “sorry you’re too little”. Yes you can say “It’s not fair”, but you cannot pretend “it’s not true”.

    On the other hand, I find the “returns from Linux community is too low” argument totally unfair if we consider things proportionally (we’re not even 1% of PC community how could we provide 50% of your bug reports).

    Besides I hope they won’t forget that this gstreamer thing in SB (and for which they put a huge work into debugging/porting for Windows that they could instead have put into improving SB for Linux, but whatever) comes from the Linux world.

    Finally I’d like to think that all the flamebait/insulting posts are in no way representative of the Linux and/or FOSS community (you know the one that created GPL, GNU/Linux, xBSD, python, mozilla, …)

  443. FluXy Apr 5, 2010 9:08 am Permalink

    This is disappointing and stupid.
    The blog entry doesn’t even make sense as not supporting everything but available is still better than not available at all.

    The new features aren’t even important, WTF !

  444. lolzers Apr 5, 2010 9:09 am Permalink

    This is pretty funny. Guess they need to change the name to videobird. This looks like a classic example of a project that forgot what they were doing.

    Oh and personally, I hate having my music player trying to play my videos. It’s starting to smell like winamp in here. Whatever happened to doing one thing and doing it really well. Why does everbody think they need to be itunes?(do everything and suck at it)

  445. g Apr 5, 2010 9:19 am Permalink

    @Foolish grunt

    >”And about Red Hat… if what you were saying were true, they would allow free Enterprise Linux downloads and charge ONLY for their support services. But that’s clearly not the case. Red Hat does charge a subscription fee before allowing any download of their Enterprise Linux title. This is legal because large portions of the code for that OS was actually produced by the Red Hat Inc employees. That makes them the copyright owner of that particular distribution, and they’re free to charge for it if they please.”<

    This is not true. You do not distinguish "Free as in Freedom" from "Free as in price". Which means that you either do not have a clue about FLOSS or you doing that intentionally.

    Did you heard about CentOS? It is 100% same as RHEL, just without trademarked logos and name. I happen to be typing this from CentOS box. In case you do not know what trademarks are (and I would not be surprised because you showed you do not have a clue), think artworks and stuff. Code is same. Whole RHEL is open source, excluding few tiny WiFi card firmwares which are distributed as blobs. GPL does not forbid you to charge for redistribution. Red Hat obey GPL. If they would not SFLC would be all over them because RHEL can not work without glibc and other GNU stuff which is copyrighted by FSF (and not by RH employees who might have written most of it), and RMS does not tolerate any GPL violation whatsoever.

    So please stop spreading FUD, I know that Songbird guys are calling people (and paying?) to defend them from total lost off open source credibility (which I think it is a lost cause by now) , but you would really need to get a clue if you want to be of service. Hint: Spreading lies about iconic community builder and vendor with perfect open source record such as Red Hat… all in purpose to make Songbird look better… that is not going to help your case at all.

    And other who are supportive to this shameful decision for songbird: Yes, rants do not represent FLOSS community, that is true, But this is big slap for Linux users, GPL'd program whose developers are talking about open source ideology suddenly dumps only truly open source OS. Songbird has all right to do that, but please, stop saying that you care about some ideology while doing that. It is a hypocrisy and only angers people even more. Admit that you did it for money and shatter last bit of illusion that you are open source community builder.

  446. Thiago Melo Apr 5, 2010 9:21 am Permalink

    This is sad, i talk to every friend of mine about songbird, then first ipod suport died, now Linux.

    I use Windows at home and Linux at work, i like to use the same software on both, Firefox, Thunderbird, Pidgin, Songbird.

    Now i will have to change my media player.

    R.I.P

  447. Forest Apr 5, 2010 9:27 am Permalink

    Yes, now that Mac and Windows users have MSC/MTP, video playback, CD ripping, and just about every other feature that we expect from a modern media player, it’s time to drop Linux support altogether and focus on those other platforms which are falling behind…

    A year ago I complained that MSC was being developed for Windows and Mac only. I was told then that it was your long term plans to add support to Linux, but you couldn’t say when exactly. When I pressed for more details, I was assured that it probably would not take longer than a year.

    And now a year later, no MSC, no MTP, no CD ripping, no video playback, and apparently, no Songbird altogether. I can’t say I didn’t see this coming, but it definitely proves your irrelevance.

  448. Name (required) Apr 5, 2010 9:35 am Permalink

    and in one move Songbird loses 80% of it’s userbase…

  449. I Vir Orfeo Apr 5, 2010 9:37 am Permalink

    I love your interface, and design, and ease of use, I only run linux, of course…
    I understand however I hope at some point, you reconsider, and I hope that your eventual return to Linux will be as widely advertised as your departure. as for now, I will continue to download the developer builds, because, quite frankly, you are still the best. We Linux users are a hardy lot, and to be honest, songbird does what I need already, one thing I would like to see Is a toggle switch for the web browsing capibility, to reduce the footprint on the system, while not in use.

  450. KhensU Apr 5, 2010 9:57 am Permalink

    Sigh..way to shoot yourself in the foot and any user base you had as well.

  451. Maximus Apr 5, 2010 10:12 am Permalink

    This is very disappointing. I dropped using Amarok on Linux because Songbird was just so much simple and easy to use. So, I guess back to using Amarok again. You’re really making a mistake to not support Linux. Sucks!

  452. Alan Apr 5, 2010 10:26 am Permalink

    Songbird is going to ditch Linux, then I’ll ditch Songbird.

  453. Jo Apr 5, 2010 10:32 am Permalink

    A sad day indeed, ive been following the linux development for years now. I just wanted to comment my farewell. Ill be concentrating my bug reports and fixes for banshee or amarok from now on.

  454. jco Apr 5, 2010 10:42 am Permalink

    Good news, I won a bet made the day Songbird did the deal with Philips.

    Anyway, besides the cross platform thing (which is important to some), in Linux we have better players.

  455. chrisinspace Apr 5, 2010 10:43 am Permalink

    Songbird: “Listen, Linux…it’s not you, it’s me”.

  456. w1ngnutz Apr 5, 2010 11:21 am Permalink

    Thanks, I’m no longer using this app from now on… It’s better ‘cos I’ll stick with default apps which run much faster and are much more integrated on the desktop.

  457. TMM Apr 5, 2010 11:22 am Permalink

    I loved songbird and I used it often, on linux and windows but now that you are dropping the linux support you are losing me, and many others. Thanks for nothing.

  458. itsjustarumour Apr 5, 2010 11:29 am Permalink

    Well, thats a shock – and a huge shame. And one less loyal user for you – as a Linux and occasonal MS Windows user, the main reason I used Songbird was because it was cross-platform. If I’m forced to use Windows, I’ll use iTunes and be done with any extra compatibility issues with Songbird. I’ll be looking for a new media player now. And Songbird was shaping up to be so awesome On LInux. Again, I say – a terrible shame.

  459. gasparov Apr 5, 2010 11:32 am Permalink

    emerge -C songbird

  460. nick Apr 5, 2010 11:32 am Permalink

    Thanks for notifying us. Your application has been uninstalled. Have a nice life.

  461. Scott Apr 5, 2010 11:34 am Permalink

    “We remain loyal to Linux and the ideology it represents, so we will maintain a version of the software for use by our Songbird engineers who develop on the Linux platform. We’ll make that version available to the community. We will keep Linux build bots and host the Linux builds on the developer wiki. That said, those builds will not be tested and may not pick up new features developed by Songbird’s team.”

    If the engineers develop on the Linux platform, why would you drop it, seems they should have a better working Linux version, than they would on other platforms since they work with the Linux.

  462. James Apr 5, 2010 11:35 am Permalink

    One has to wonder how long it will be before the Mac port is killed as well.

  463. Bob Apr 5, 2010 11:57 am Permalink

    You dropped ipod support and that was strike one. You drop Linux support now and thats strike two. No, better yet just fuck this shit. You have killed off the only two reasons I used songbird, linux+ipod. You aren’t even on my computer anymore.

  464. Carlos Lopez Apr 5, 2010 11:58 am Permalink

    Songbird no longer has my respect. I’m a Mac user and I’m leaving Songbird.

  465. W^L+ Apr 5, 2010 12:12 pm Permalink

    I’m not angry or hateful. I’ve liked (and sometimes disliked) Songbird, but you’ve got to admit that for most of us that used it, it was because the same app is available on Linux and $DESKTOP_OS. The product performance hasn’t been good (on Linux/Windows), certainly not at the level of iTunes on Windows or Amarok 1.4 on Linux.

    Thus, this seems suicidal to me. If I’m going to have to use platform-specific apps again, Songbird loses anywhere it competes. *What I’d like to see is a list of what contributions you need from your Linux user community in order to preserve a fully cross-platform application.* We may (or may not) be willing and able to provide those things, but at least we’ll know what needs to be done.

    I do hope you succeed with your new direction, and that it enables you to come back with an updated Linux version. I just don’t see that happening when you’re so outclassed on Windows and Mac. (For non-iTunes users, DoubleTwist is far superior on those platforms.)

  466. Jan Apr 5, 2010 12:13 pm Permalink

    It is hard for my not to swear or to use dirty words.
    I really hope that this a delayed April Fool’s joke!
    If it is true, the spirit and idea of Songbird is gone.
    Good luck

  467. snq Apr 5, 2010 12:34 pm Permalink

    Come on! I’ve just discovered it and now you’re telling me it’s over? It was a really good piece of code- I hope it will come back some day.

  468. greenone Apr 5, 2010 12:34 pm Permalink

    the sadest news I ever heard, im very disappointed.
    Being an Open Source supported project but no longer support linux?????
    Why MAC users needs support, 99.99% of them use iTunes, but Windows/ Linux users always wanted to have a nice player on both of them and songbird was the one…

    good bye Songbird…
    …o.O…

  469. Tuxy Apr 5, 2010 12:56 pm Permalink

    Oh please cheer up, Microsoft has decided to follow the example of the Songbird developers and drop support for Windows Media Player on Windows to concentrate on a narrow set of options, first off they will make sure the bloated mediocre WMP is availabe to Linux users.

  470. G Apr 5, 2010 1:25 pm Permalink

    If the company is not making any money by catering to the Linux users, why would it continue?

    Would any of you BUY Songbird for Linux if the company were to continue developing it? I bet none of you would, and just as many of you would spend your time whining if Songbird made a decision in that direction.

    I personally was amazed that you wasted your time with Linux when most Linux users barely contribute to projects they use, much less with paying for anything at all.

  471. banshee Apr 5, 2010 1:29 pm Permalink

    Now, banshee

  472. sudoSamurai Apr 5, 2010 1:31 pm Permalink

    So long, and thanks for all the fish… er… tunes

  473. Kasuo Apr 5, 2010 1:54 pm Permalink

    @G – I would gladly pay for Songbird on Linux. It’s a great application and has a great future.

  474. Bobby Apr 5, 2010 1:56 pm Permalink

    Songbird was part of our companies default installation for the last 2 years. I am sorry, but the overall health of the open source movement depends on the overall support of an open source OS. Without a Linux version (i.e. by only supporting closed source OSes) I cannot, in good conscience, support Songbird.

    We are only a couple thousand installs (and some gear) but now we will be pointing our users some place else. Thank you guys for the work you have done in the past; but in the future, please don’t set out the expectation of full cross-platform support unless you plan on following through with it. If we had known what would happen, we never would have bothered.

  475. Jan Apr 5, 2010 1:56 pm Permalink

    emerge -C songbird

  476. Alex Apr 5, 2010 1:59 pm Permalink

    “Comments for this post will close on Tuesday 4/6 @ 5 pm PST.”

    WOW, way to hide what the community wants.

    Good Jorb guys.

  477. Alex Apr 5, 2010 2:01 pm Permalink

    ************************************
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Also, did anyone notice that the usage percent for Linux is higher then Mac?

    Linux 7.7%
    Linux 64 3.2%
    ———————–
    Linux = 10.9%

    Mac = 10.8%

  478. Stephan Apr 5, 2010 2:10 pm Permalink

    According to your stats, there are more active Linux users than Mac users.
    However, you split it into Linux 32 and Linux 64, which is very misleading.

    7.7% (Linux 32) + 3.2% (Linux 64) = 10.9% (Linux)
    10.9% Linux > 10.8% Mac

    Windows isn’t split into 32 and 64-bit. Why? And the OS Usage stat at the bottom is bogus and irrelevant. Worldwide OS usage doesn’t matter, what matters is how many people use your program. According to your (misleading) stats, Macs make up the smallest percentage of your users, so, logically, you should dump Mac as a platform. This just seems like a feeble attempt to justify your decision.

    Even more bogus is the fact that most of these stats only cover the past 30 days. I’d like to see some complete statistics. I’d wager Linux users have contributed a lot more than your stats suggest.

    (Not that my comment will make any difference, since I’m sure you stopped reading these days ago.)

  479. Tyler Apr 5, 2010 2:42 pm Permalink

    I’m truly sorry to see the day that I must quite using Songbird but this seems to be the day. Farewell Songbird, I knew you well. Songbird without Linux support is dead to me.

  480. Mike123 Apr 5, 2010 2:43 pm Permalink

    I agree about that ‘funny math’ of dicing up linux users. Like everyone else on the blog, I suggest Linux users go Banshee all the way. Having tried Songbird, Amarok, Rhythmbox and Banshee, I found, like many others, that Banshee is by far the best.

    With only one text file setup I am now syncing my my wireless phone and girlfriend’s iPod all with one app, Banshee, which I never thought I would be able to do. Smooth last.fm, wiki and youtube integration and stability just blows the competition away.

  481. Scotland Apr 5, 2010 2:52 pm Permalink

    As a Windows user who gradually shifted his apps over to cross-platform ones that would allow me to switch to Linux with minimal application pain, this news saddens me. Having used Linux for almost a year as my main home machine, it was nice to see Songbird continuing to mature on my new platform of choice.

    As others have pointed out, Linux seems to have as much usage as MacOS, though perhaps some Linux specific skillsets are needed on your team and those aren’t there anymore or worth staffing anymore. That’s a pity. I wish the community would step up but I’m doubtful – I don’t know that Songbird ever reached a critical mass given so many other Linux specific music players already exist.

    I really like the Songbird interface (using gekko, making it extensible using CSS/HTML, etc, and that the plugins were cross-platform)

  482. Scotland Apr 5, 2010 2:53 pm Permalink

    As a Windows user who gradually shifted his apps over to cross-platform ones that would allow me to switch to Linux with minimal application pain, this news saddens me. Having used Linux for almost a year as my main home machine, it was nice to see Songbird continuing to mature on my new platform of choice.

    As others have pointed out, Linux seems to have as much usage as MacOS, though perhaps some Linux specific skillsets are needed on your team and those aren’t there anymore or worth staffing anymore. That’s a pity. I wish the community would step up but I’m doubtful – I don’t know that Songbird ever reached a critical mass given so many other Linux specific music players already exist.

    I really like the Songbird interface (using gekko, making it extensible using CSS/HTML, etc, and that the plugins were cross-platform). I’ll miss it.

  483. DJ Apr 5, 2010 2:57 pm Permalink

    Goodbye Songbird…Goodbye Philips. I am not sad, nor disappointed. It’s Songbird who will lose out on this deal, not the Linux community. Time will tell.

  484. Mike Apr 5, 2010 3:07 pm Permalink

    Yea so Mac and Linux are pretty much tied in usage and you drop linux? What self-respecting Mac user would use songbird instead of itunes? if your gonna spend that much, you buy into the whole mac package. How do you expect to really compete on windows? Windows media player isn’t great but it’s useable, and there are a ton of shitty free players (just like songbird) made for windows. Not to mention that itunes runs just fine on windows too… Songbird has gotten a lot better with the last release, but it’s still a buggy, bloated piece of shit sometimes, Amarok and even ugly ass rythymbox still run better on linux. Now that you stoped being cross-platform, you lost the only selling point you had. I think that the better idea, as some here have said, would have been to call out to the linux community for more help. Songbird was only just starting to get a huge Linux following (thanks to Amarok2 sucking for a while). I’m waiting for a good linux fork to happen, then maybe i’ll use that.

  485. Forest Apr 5, 2010 3:12 pm Permalink

    I don’t really buy it that these usage statistics bolster the argument to discontinue support for Linux.

    The statistics show that Linux users file the same number of bugs and contribute the same amount to add-on development as other users despite the fact that Songbird has seen almost no new features for Linux in over a year. We should expect those numbers to be a lot lower. After all, how is a Linux user going to file a bug on CD RIP, MSC, MTP, or video playback if those services don’t even exist on their operating system? The fact of the matter is that Linux is what most open source software developers use and if you want their support and contributions, you need to support Linux. Personally, I think this project is going to die out without it.

  486. Aus Apr 5, 2010 3:18 pm Permalink

    @Alex

    It has nothing to do with ‘hiding’ anything. Sadly, the conversation going on in this comment thread is not constructive. This is why we are closing the comment thread. I think at this point we’ve gotten that Linux users are angry, irate, fuming at us dropping official Linux support.

    Usage totals are only part of the decision. QA effort required to test on the most popular Linux distros overshadows the amount of effort required to test on Mac OS.

  487. Lopo de Almeida Apr 5, 2010 3:25 pm Permalink

    As I see in your chart Linux has 10.9% of the users and Mac OS X has only 10.8% so, with this in vision shouldn’t you ditch Mac OS X instead of Linux?

    Translators and website visitors are also more on Linux than in Mac OS X.

    You even say that “While our Linux users are some of the most passionate, do some killer development, and always provide tremendous input as to whether we’re on the right path or not” and besides that you ditch them?

    This is not understandable at all. I foresee a Songbird fork on the near horizon and you will be the ones who will loose on the long run.

  488. ali Apr 5, 2010 3:39 pm Permalink

    @Stephan: You asked, “Windows isn’t split into 32 and 64-bit. Why?” The answer is that we don’t have to create separate builds to support 32-bit and 64-bit Windows. 64-bit Windows users have the ability to install and use our 32-bit application. That’s not an option on Linux, where we have to maintain two separate builds just to nominally support the most popular distros.

    We know you guys are smart; we’re not trying to pull one over on you. Sure, 10.9% of our users are on Linux, but it requires two completely distinct builds to get there! We have nearly the same amount of users on Mac with just one build (or, to put it another way, with just half the build/QA/release effort).

  489. Sebastian Apr 5, 2010 3:52 pm Permalink

    By dropping support for Linux you make one thing very clear: Songbird will not be “the Firefox of media players” as Firefox fully supports Linux.

  490. linman Apr 5, 2010 4:50 pm Permalink

    thunder is a jackass, i would ask though, is songbird that important? it is just a a media player for god’s sake, go use qod libet, banshee, or if you are in the mood to curse use rhythmbox.

  491. Enter Name Here Apr 5, 2010 4:54 pm Permalink

    While I still do not like that support is being dropped for Linux (and I still think it’s a bit silly that Linux is being dropped in favor of OS X), I’m comforted in the fact that it seems there will be a community driven fork (tentatively named Lyrebird). Also, uninstalling Songbird has forced me to find a new player; I’ve been using Guayadeque for the past few days and am pleased with how mature it is for such a young player. Its future development looks to be pretty exciting.

    However, I again urge the Songbird dev team to reconsider this decision.

  492. Khan Apr 5, 2010 5:32 pm Permalink

    Yoiu know its ironic that the hate you are getting for this stupid decision is coming from the community that supported your app the most.
    The linux community will strike back with insults, then forks your project while the original will fall into obscurity.
    Of course the linux users are angry, and who can blame them.
    For an app that claims to like linux ditching it is stabbing it in the back.
    As linux grows, sonbird will shrink.
    Good riddance

  493. Foolishgrunt Apr 5, 2010 5:58 pm Permalink

    @ g:

    To be fair, I’ll admit that I didn’t look closely enough at the distribution terms of RHEL. I was right in my assertion that it’s only downloadable for a fee, but I wasn’t aware that the source code was still freely available. I apologize for misrepresenting the nature of the project.

    But before you start accusing me of FUDing, I’ll thank you to look up the difference between “copyright” and “trademark.” Then look up the exact terms of the GPL and just see how many times the word “copyright” is used. Take a look at the legal rights reserved for the authors of an open source project, and you’ll see that I’m not nearly as confused as you think I am.

  494. Breno Figueiredo Apr 5, 2010 6:03 pm Permalink

    Ok. I talked about Songbird with friends, clients and others. It was my favorite media player. But, now, I will find another cross-platform program. I use Windows, Ubuntu and Mac. I´m sorry !!! That´s all. Good bye

  495. Garth Apr 5, 2010 6:26 pm Permalink

    Although I can understand closing comments, it should be noted that this kind of response should have been expected. You dropped support for an OS that a fair amount of people used (comparable to Mac users) and probably recommended it to a fair amount of the Windows users that you currently have. I’m sure it was a tough decision to make, and in my opinion I believe it was a poor one, but a lot of the comments here are mainly people telling you that if you’re not going to support their OS, they’re not going to support your product. Did you expect them to all just sit happily and say “I guess that’s for the best?” Of course not! They obviously enjoyed your product enough to use and recommend it and they feel betrayed that you would make such a huge decision without at least giving forewarning.

  496. Tareeq Apr 5, 2010 6:59 pm Permalink

    I am a cross platform user, just wanted to say, this news is upsetting, but good luck, I think you will need it. Songbird wasn’t perfect it used a lot of memory, but it played music and was a great tagger, I didn’t care it could browse the web nor do I care for video playback.

    Again good luck…probably going to switch back to amarok.

  497. Nate Apr 5, 2010 7:21 pm Permalink

    Nice going. You just lost a good chunk of your users. Why the foreplay? Why not just go ahead and drop support for every OS except Windows 7? …Songbird is clearly not community-driven.

  498. John Apr 5, 2010 7:22 pm Permalink

    Yech. Too bad, Songbird on Linux was great (and the only reason I recommended Songbird to others)

    Your new tune sucks.

  499. Geoff Apr 5, 2010 7:30 pm Permalink

    I’ve used Songbird since version 0.1, and it was buggy, but showed hope. Then they dropped the iPod support and now they drop the Linux support. I guess I’m stuck with Windows and iTunes until Linux has a media player that I don’t absolutely hate. I feel extremely betrayed. I won’t use Songbird again, on any OS, unless they bring back Linux support.

  500. Alex Apr 5, 2010 8:20 pm Permalink

    And that 10% of Linux users seemed to be the only ones passionate about your software, too.

    Ditch the ones who care for the mindless masses? Whatever…

  501. Scotland Apr 5, 2010 8:38 pm Permalink

    As a Windows user who gradually shifted his apps over to cross-platform ones that would allow me to switch to Linux with minimal applications-related pain, this news saddens me. Having used Linux for almost a year as my main home machine, it was nice to see Songbird continuing to mature on my new platform of choice, Linux.

    As others have pointed out, Linux seems to have as much usage as MacOS, though perhaps you don’t want to pay for the Linux specific development or testing anymore. That’s a pity. I wish the community would step up but I’m doubtful – I don’t know that Songbird ever reached a critical mass as a project given so many other Linux specific music players already exist.

    I really like the Songbird interface. The fact that it used gekko made it extensible using CSS/HTML/javascript and it was really cool that the plugins were cross-platform. What I have still is usable but it’s a shame that it probably won’t get any significant updates anymore and I’ll eventually migrate to something else. I’ll miss it.

    Good luck on the other platforms, but I can’t help but think that the cross-platform compatibility (Windows/Mac/Linux – same as Firefox) is what first drew me to Songbird. Without that, I’m not sure how much community support (from both end-users and developers) you will be losing. In any case, no hard feelings – thanks for all the open source support to this point (and, as you said, the code is still open) – best of luck in the future.

  502. Furthur Apr 5, 2010 8:59 pm Permalink

    Not only is the user base for linux higher than OSX, but what about the source builds on other OSes like Solaris and BSD?

    However, the thing that strikes me to most is that of all the linux user base, the a great MANY of them account also for the windows/osx portion as dual booting is very common.

    Time for a fork guys :p

  503. Sad day... Apr 5, 2010 9:03 pm Permalink

    These stats are completely irrelevant, 3days? visits to getsongbird? cmon… anyone using linux will NOT be downloading from the main website but instead will download from some package manager (or even getdeb for ubuntu systems..) static binaries are the last resort for installing applications

  504. Akshat Apr 5, 2010 9:08 pm Permalink

    I can’t wait to see Songbird team’s face when the fork outgrows the parent and gets more contributors then the Songbird team will be like WTF!$%^%^&$%&%@$&^@#%&@#%#$^#%.Something like what happened with Debian and Ubuntu.

  505. h4k Apr 5, 2010 9:22 pm Permalink

    The facts are that you should support linux and windows, they have Itunes in Mac.

  506. Dapper Dan Apr 5, 2010 9:55 pm Permalink

    i instantly removed songbird from my linux notebook – guys that was a fail

  507. Andy Apr 5, 2010 9:56 pm Permalink

    Very bad news!
    Songbird was my favourite player under ubuntu.
    now i look for another player.

    sad, i’ve recommend songbird to many windows user…

  508. typek_pb Apr 5, 2010 10:15 pm Permalink

    this is sad, I used songbird because of it’s multiplatformness… need the same player for windows and linux, I see that you have different priorities, and that’s OK, go for what you want…. anyway, guys, any alternative for songbird you can recommend? thx

  509. ... Apr 5, 2010 10:58 pm Permalink

    A big part of the ideology linux represents is about the community. People from the linux community contributed to Songbird and now you drop support to linux because of a business decision, way to go. This decision, more than hurting Songbird, it hurts open source itself.

  510. Kristof Loos Apr 5, 2010 11:01 pm Permalink

    This is so sad, that you guys are leaving us behind.
    Offcourse the Windows and Mac commuity is bigger, so you can earn money on it. Linux is still not known well enough to the public.

    It is sad that’s the only thing I can say, besides that the Linux version really is a great piece of software. That is what it makes even worse :-(

    Kristoffel

  511. ... Apr 5, 2010 11:05 pm Permalink

    A big part of the ideology linux represents has to do with community.
    People from the linux community contributed to the project and you
    decide to drop linux support because of a business decision. This
    decision, more than hurting the project hurts open source itself.

    By the way, I share the opinion of many people in here, Songbird’s
    #1 feature is the fact that it is cross-platform, is it really worth to lose
    that? I hope you reconsider this…

  512. vinnieandersen Apr 5, 2010 11:10 pm Permalink

    Well I think U should seriously drop support for WIndose 7 and windos primarily and
    forget about Mac .
    Cant U see the comments ,all of ‘em . They all were asking for superior support for LINUX and instead U drop the support.
    If u cannot support for Linux fully and make available ur new features for it what good it is for u to say “we still remain loyal and we are still open source”.

    U say our engineers maintains builds for Linux. The builds will be either “broken” or not “fully featured” and we need to crack out head fixing it.

    What ever U do provide full support first for linux and then the rest.

  513. Thorn Apr 5, 2010 11:13 pm Permalink

    I used to argument for Songbird and use it every day because it gave me the possibility to have the same audio application on all the platforms I have to run. I even was about to introduce Songbird to a audience of some 30 fellow sysadmins in a presentation held by me during a seminar at the end of this month – because of the Multi-Platform / OSS feature. Now I can’t and won’t do this – in fact I will cease to use Songbird on Linux & Windows :

    If I can’t use it on both systems I won’t use it on either!

    Bye and thanks for all the fish.

    P.S. Don’t you realize yourself by now, that you are shooting your own leg by estranging your most fervent supporters / co-developers / bug-trackers?

  514. ldmcbn Apr 5, 2010 11:14 pm Permalink

    this project has sucked from the beginning anyway. i always TRIED to like it. but its _just_so_buggy_ and SLOOOOW. bloated garbageware. linux is better off without you.

  515. Laurent Raufaste Apr 5, 2010 11:20 pm Permalink

    Bye bye SongBird !

  516. typek_pb Apr 5, 2010 11:23 pm Permalink

    one more comment from my side, argument that linux has not been dominant platform in from usage point of view is logical, as on ubuntu it didn’t even get to repos. see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/94494

  517. mr-pink Apr 5, 2010 11:49 pm Permalink

    I’m an Ubuntu fan. Actually I didn’t know Songbird before reading this announcement in a RSS feed, so I decided to give it a try… I found it fantastic. I’m very sad to know they’ll drop linux support an I can’t understand why they don’t DROP MAC SUPPORT INSTEAD: if look at the shares at the top of this page you can see that 10.8% of Songbird users have a Mac while 10.9% use Linux!!

  518. Edu Camargo Apr 5, 2010 11:53 pm Permalink

    I really wish that Quodlibet could fill the gaps that Songbird might be leaving for Linux users, especially some newbies like me, who thought that SB would accompany me for years.

    Or perhaps, since Exail is based on Amarok’s code, hope it fills the gap for users of Gnome with Orca.

    Windows users already have Winamp and Foobar, especially if they want FLAC support. In the same condition, Mac users have sbooth’s Play, if you want FLAC support. Well, nothin’ is lost, so…

    Goodbye Songbird.

  519. wnmnkh Apr 5, 2010 11:54 pm Permalink

    That’s rather shame. And you gotta stop lying about us as well behind Phillips deals.

    You realize those 1% linux users did 9% of bug report contributions while those 93% of windows users did 77% bug report contributions?

    With some basic maths, you would find us Linux users did about 11 times more productive on error report and other stuffs compared to such large windows user base.

    But whatever, what do I expect to a player which even can’t do very basic stuffs? For example, when will you ever fix a bug that songbird simply does not support embedded art on flac files? After submitted a bug report, I realized this bug was reported as early as 2008.

    For two years, you guys have not even fixed very basic feature that all multimedia player should properly handle. May I start other “basic” features that just not work properly on WINDOWS version of this software?

    I am not surprised, sadden or angered anyway, since even Windows version, which is main platform for Songbird, is barely usable and resource hog, what can we expect from ANY other platforms, let alone Linux?

    Well, have fun try competing iTunes on Mac (you really need some incredible lucks for that) and thrive on Windows. Sadly, even Windows Media player 12 is clearly superior to Songbird, and not many free/commercial products are worse than standard MS consumer softwares. Hey, even this WMP 12 can be a wonderful software for playing ogg and flac files with right pieces of add-ons.

    Well, if cutting off linux helps for getting more funds to Windows, please fix the basic features first.

    By the way I am a Windows user, and there is little reason to choose this software since there are already much better alternatives in both free and commercial -Foobar2000 for free, Winamp and its variants (such as MediaMonkey) for commercial.

  520. wnmnkh Apr 5, 2010 11:57 pm Permalink

    Should have said “a Windows user as well” on last paragraph.

  521. darkscot Apr 6, 2010 12:02 am Permalink

    I am shocked and stunned at this decision! Now I will be looking not only for an alternative to Songbird but and alternative to Firefox!

  522. tucraclo Apr 6, 2010 12:16 am Permalink

    linux FTW!!! f**k windows, macos and now songbird too

  523. tucraclo Apr 6, 2010 12:18 am Permalink

    how you can kill the linux-support? you are bad people.

  524. tucraclo Apr 6, 2010 12:22 am Permalink

    why you don’t kill the macos support?

  525. Fugee Apr 6, 2010 1:04 am Permalink

    Exaile, here we come

  526. Scuttlebutt Apr 6, 2010 2:01 am Permalink

    Embracing Ubuntu but abandoning Songbird.

    Everything has a price!

  527. fred Apr 6, 2010 2:18 am Permalink

    if it’s a problem having songbird 32 bit and songbird 64 bit for linux drop the 64 bit support.

  528. Danny Dubya Apr 6, 2010 2:36 am Permalink

    Edu Camargo : “Or perhaps, since Exaile is based on Amarok’s code”

    It’s not — it was designed around Amarok 1.4, but not code-derived.

  529. vistakiller Apr 6, 2010 2:41 am Permalink

    And we see that the linux user is more than mac…

  530. Avinandan Apr 6, 2010 2:46 am Permalink

    Come on Linux users, thats not a big deal, we just got rid-off another buggy player from the long list.

    Banshee, Exile, Amarok, Rhythmbox, Clamentine…. those are ready to rock us!

  531. Ian M Apr 6, 2010 2:48 am Permalink

    I’m working on moving from Windows to Linux – if Songbird doesn’t run on Linux, I’ll have to move to another application, as I need something that I can use on both platforms :(

  532. defred Apr 6, 2010 2:49 am Permalink

    Stupid decision, open-source projects should ALWAYS keep a decent linux support, I used to try and like songbird. Anything dedicated to “ennemy” closed source OS is my “ennemy”.

  533. 123 Apr 6, 2010 2:49 am Permalink
  534. fred Apr 6, 2010 2:52 am Permalink

    linux users are more than 10.9%, since many of them have downloaded songbird from getdeb

  535. stenosis Apr 6, 2010 3:12 am Permalink

    goodbye songbird

  536. Nate Apr 6, 2010 3:20 am Permalink

    That’s true. Another thing that is overlooked are the number of people, including myself, who download and install applications via their distro’s package manager; NOT via a direct-download from the web site or its affiliates.

    Songbird is packaged on many repositories, which is the standard method for downloading and installing applications on the most popular Linux distros.

    So your “statistics” are innacurate.

  537. fatah Apr 6, 2010 3:45 am Permalink

    Bon débarras !
    y en a plein d’alternatives, dieu merci !

  538. yaha Apr 6, 2010 3:45 am Permalink

    real sad to know that, songbird is definitely best music player in linux
    good look and good features
    hope your crew to change mind

  539. Guillaume Apr 6, 2010 3:59 am Permalink

    This is a really sad day for me and for the linux community. I thought the Songbird crew shared the values of the Mozilla foundation, who always made a pride of keeping their Linux version at par with the other versions of their software. This is clearly a lack of vision by the Songbird crew. From what I see, you have more active users on Linux than on Mac OSX, so why are you keeping the Mac version of Songbird?

  540. Marc Diethelm Apr 6, 2010 4:29 am Permalink

    That is so disappointing. The biggest impact Songbird (which I loved) had for me was that over the course of all its iterations it completely borked my music library. (Being a DJ that really, really sucks.)

    POTI seems to be on the road of becoming just another media software company with a rather standard strategy. No visionary investment in the future; no invigorating, generative partnerships with like-minded projects.

    Video, schmideo! Trading a community for users – hardly a smart idea. Of course you need investors, however if your communication with the community hadn’t been so bad, a lot (a lot!) of momentum could have been created. Did POTI ever speak to the likes of Canonical about a truly productive partnership?

    Bye, bye Songbird.

  541. chrisinspace Apr 6, 2010 5:19 am Permalink

    @darkscot…Don’t bash Mozilla. They had nothing to with this. Songbird uses their source code because it is open source, but Mozilla have no influence over the decisions of PoTI. I have seen this type of backlash against Mozilla in other forums as well, but it is not warranted. They have always provided full support to Linux and given us the full-featured browser with no feature-lag unlike Songbird. Please don’t let PoTI’s abandonment of the Open Source community drag Mozilla’s name through the mud.

  542. Stephen Carey Apr 6, 2010 5:26 am Permalink

    you make a big mistake!
    you are one reason why microsoft has such a big market share. developers are just too stupid to develope cross platform.
    i’m really disappointed!

  543. Tom Apr 6, 2010 6:07 am Permalink

    I cannot understand, why songbird for Linux will be discontinued. VERY BAD IDEA…

    I really love Songbird, and use it on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X. This is very disappointing! Please think about this Twice!

    I’m sure, many people will remove their songbird installations from their Macs and PCs, when they can’t use it on Linux anymore.

    Keep on with the really good work, BUT PLEASE SUPPORT LINUX.

  544. anon Apr 6, 2010 6:10 am Permalink

    Time to dump the Mac version then!
    Oh wait.. wat..?

  545. chrisinspace Apr 6, 2010 6:33 am Permalink

    @sad day…Good point. I rarely visited GetSongbird.com or downloaded the binaries. I always installed and updated Songbird through GetDeb.net.

  546. job Apr 6, 2010 6:33 am Permalink

    I hope whole Songbird project will fail then!! I hate u songbird developers!! You all suck!!

  547. Stephen Apr 6, 2010 6:41 am Permalink

    I have to agree with Darryl. I will no longer be using Songbird on any system ever again. A fork has been started called Nightengale which will support all of the above. So long songbird development team.

  548. Xtreme Apr 6, 2010 6:46 am Permalink

    Sad news.

    @tom 200% ack

    I’m working on a Ubuntu PC, using a Windumb Vista Notebook for Emails and a mac Mini for DVD’s/home

    Guess on which machine I’m using Songbird the most?
    Right. Ubuntu.

  549. Xtreme Apr 6, 2010 6:50 am Permalink

    P.s.: I donated every year _BECAUSE_ Songbird supported all platforms equally.

  550. anonymous coward Apr 6, 2010 6:54 am Permalink

    Thanx 4 nothing.
    SB never worked right on linux anyway, so nobody will really miss it!
    That is what makes open source software so good: you DO have a choice.
    On a sidenote: how does SB stack up against WMP or itunes? more than 2% user share? Hardly.
    c u

  551. n2 Apr 6, 2010 6:59 am Permalink

    I like(d) songbird but (fortunately) i don’t need songbird:

    * amarok
    * banshee
    * exaile
    * firefox plugins

  552. matthieu Apr 6, 2010 7:01 am Permalink

    Bye bye Songbird then … i don’t see a point in using it anymore.

  553. Kai Apr 6, 2010 7:24 am Permalink

    Dropping Linux support is unfair, in my opinion.

    If you are enjoying the benefits of an open source infrastructure that the developers of the core Mozilla provide for you, you should feel morally obliged to contribute to the open source ecosystem by keeping your software usable.

    Kai

  554. Josh Apr 6, 2010 7:41 am Permalink

    I deployed songbird across 245 Linux workstations at work a few months ago.. Starting today Songbird has been removed from our PXE image in favor of Banshee.

  555. Tyler Apr 6, 2010 7:46 am Permalink

    I have to agree with all of the other posts…I have followed the Songbird project since its infancy and even when you guys turned “corporate” I still held on but this is the last straw. This is the nail in the coffin as far as I’m concerned. So I’m no longer following Songbird, and your feed has been deleted from my Reader account.

  556. pete Apr 6, 2010 7:58 am Permalink

    wow , just wow . first i thought it is a late excellent april fools joke , but now . hey this is sooo sad , because i think you are (were ) a prestige , first class software on the linux platform . imagine no firefox anymore for linux . you are the heartbeat on this open platform and now u just killed it . please reconsider …..

  557. Papiertiger Apr 6, 2010 8:02 am Permalink

    So thanks guys for the good times together using songbird. Guess I’ll keep running the current version for a while and then switch back to mpd.

  558. Forest Apr 6, 2010 8:04 am Permalink

    @Aus

    “Sadly, the conversation going on in this comment thread is not constructive. This is why we are closing the comment thread. I think at this point we’ve gotten that Linux users are angry, irate, fuming at us dropping official Linux support.”

    Yes, people are angry and they have good reason to be. Linux users have long been promised that POTI would start adding MSC, MTP, CD Rip, video playback, etc. in Linux as soon those features were finished on other platforms. Now those features are complete on other platforms, and instead of devoting a development cycle or two to Linux (you’ve already devoted many additional development cycles to Windows/Mac), you’re dropping Linux support altogether.

    If you’re looking for constructive advice, then here’s what I suggest: Instead of announcing that you’re dropping Linux support and then lambasting people for being angry, you should have asked the community for more support earlier on. This is the first time that any of us have even been told that you were considering this. And if you’re going to ask for community support, you have to be willing to give a little yourself. If you had been willing to make a few changes to get an Ubuntu package accepted, then you would have attracted tons of new Linux users/developers to your program. Partnering with Canonical would have been a good idea; they are a company with a lot of resources.

    So instead of dropping Linux support and reacting defensively to the fact that people are angry, why don’t you drop Linux 64bit support, lower your QA standards for Linux, and tell the community that they will have to contribute more code if they want to see full Linux support remain. Personally, your QA process is not very important to me and I would rather have some of the same basic features that Windows/Mac users have like MSC, MTP, CD Rip, and video playback rather than 100% perfect QA. Maybe, you could convince the community to develop one of those features (say MSC) in exchange for POTI developing a different one like CD Rip.

  559. Martin Bartlett Apr 6, 2010 8:05 am Permalink

    Your own update indicating a number of people who could not keep a civil tongue amongst the no-doubt thousands of complaints you have received just reflects the level of anger and stupification that your short-sighted decision has provoked. No matter: there are plenty of alternatives on Linux, and, as others have pointed out, much BETTER alternatives on Windows and Macs. The big thing you once had going for you was cross-platform, but now you’ve cut off your own feet – so SB will die fairly soon – a pitty, but you’ve lost the plot guys!

  560. Nightingale Apr 6, 2010 8:09 am Permalink
  561. coskibum Apr 6, 2010 8:35 am Permalink

    I’ve read the comments and waited to post my thoughts. Since you are cutting off comments(stupid move) I’ll make it short and sweet…

    I’ve been a songbird fan since it’s birth. I’ve used it on Windows, Macs and Linux. I sat through Laura’s posts on this blog… She was more interested in what was for lunch than giving us in the flock any real updates. Once stevel started giving us some updates I had renewed hope. Only to see you start cutting back features in the Linux version. I asked repeatedly about the so called “road map” never once getting a response to my post. Now I see Aus’s response and the sheer arrogance he has for this community. Did you think that everyone would be OK with your decision? Did you think we would be happy about it?

    When I read the other day that you were dropping support I was stunned. I just couldn’t believe that you would drop support without even asking for additional help. I’ve been reading all these post above and see a recurring theme. You have let a passionate fan base not only down but now are cutting off any dialogue. Is that how you really want to be remembered? You claim that you support open source but you actions indicate other wise. Who ever is handling your PR should be fired! You have dug your own grave and must sleep in it.

    Like many others here I hope you have a change of heart and return to the support of the Linux version.
    It’s the right thing to do!

  562. job Apr 6, 2010 8:49 am Permalink

    Seems like Songbird developers suck Micro$hit’s ass! Micro$hit sucks and then you guys suck too and even more! You can’t do nothing, stupid dumbasses. Can
    t even code Linux version of SB. Idiots…
    I’m dissapointed! I hope your songbird project will die soon!

  563. NoOne Apr 6, 2010 8:54 am Permalink

    Okay, now I’m using Rhythmbox and it’s pretty good. That said, newbie the GNU/Linux users truly lose something: the best way to prepare a switch is to start with crossplatform apps on Windows machines: Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice.org, LimeWire, Pidgin, VLC, The GIMP and so on but sadly Songbird is not part of that list anymore — although aTunes and Jajuk may be interesting crossplatform, free software replacements that I’ll be testing and advising from now on if they’re OK.

    …but come on, it would be so much better if you folks reconsider your position and continue to support GNU/Linux (note that Mandriva 2010 beta 1 just updated Songbird to version 1.4.3…) See if you can’t sponsor a community driven version, make a call for donations and volunteer devs, there’s certainly something better to do than dropping GNU/Linux abruptly. What can we do to help you continue to support that OS? Give me a chance to forget my rm -r Songbird and reinstall the bird.

  564. ticked off Apr 6, 2010 8:59 am Permalink

    @OP
    Your measurement of “Linux involvement” is wrong:

    Visits to getsongbird.com (5) (5) Google Analytics data for visits to getsongbird.com for year 2009

    This is stupid. I never downloaded Songbird from some ‘getsongbird.com’, I always used getdeb.

    http://www.getdeb.net/welcome/

    And lots of people got Songbird from me, so they dod not go to getsongbird.com either.

    Bug Reporters (2) W 77% M 14% L 9% (2) Measured by OS user agent used by community reporting a bug in last 30 days

    This only shows that Mac and windows are damn buggy OSes. And what OS user agent? Did you spied on me?

    Anyway, every statistic shows that Linux users has bigger involvement than other OSes based on number of total users. Linux should have 1%, but it has 10% or so. And count in that Songbird is not distributed by default in any distribution. Think what you could have if you moved your but to convince Canonical or Red Hat to distribute Songbird with Ubuntu or Fedora.

    Sorry but those statistics does not show that you missed your foot. You hit it very hard, but you are probably drunk after crazy night with Philips so you don’t feal a thing. It is going to hurt in the morning.

  565. Mez Apr 6, 2010 9:07 am Permalink

    I would not recommend Banshee as a replacement for Songbird, coz’ Banshee relies on Mono, which is running very slowly actually. The most interesting and lasting solutions would be to help Rhythmbox, Amarok, Exaile (and so on) reaching a higher standard, even if they’re already quite good and definitely less buggy than Songbird.

  566. millenion Apr 6, 2010 9:10 am Permalink

    I am sad that songbird is not supported anymore on linux, as I am sad that ipod devices were not. It was fantastic anyway, the best I tried (amarok 1 and 2, rythmbox are not as good)…

  567. zozzo Apr 6, 2010 9:53 am Permalink

    [root@localhost ~]# urpme songbird

    it’s easy

  568. pffff Apr 6, 2010 10:11 am Permalink

    fuck you

  569. Orly Apr 6, 2010 10:12 am Permalink

    Visits to getsongbird.com 15% for Linux. I say that it should not be based on those stats. Many Linux users apt-get, emerge, and other ways to acquire the software.

    I am guessing Microsoft threw some cash their way to lose the Linux user base.

  570. phede86 Apr 6, 2010 10:13 am Permalink

    W Banshee, Rythmbox, Amarok and VLC true open source !
    Goodbey Songbird version Linux and Windows

  571. Angry Apr 6, 2010 10:21 am Permalink

    Companies focusing on Windows (and Mac) don’t help Linux to get more users. People which keep using Linux just get “not as good” softwares. This contributes the cliches “Linux miss this app killer” and “on Linux you always have to hack something to get it working”.

    For those who don’t know what a “unit test suite” is: this is a set of small robots which test if software works as expected. Of course, these “robots” are made by humans, and can not test all the possibilities (otherwise, you would have never heard of “bugs” !). So, automated testing on Linux does not mean it works as well as on other platforms, sadly.

    When a company needs money, it focus on developing amazing features (“iPad support, omg this is awesome”) for user majority (often Windows). Working for 10% of users or writing unit tests means loosing money – at first ?

  572. Alex Apr 6, 2010 10:46 am Permalink

    Welll, that fork came fast.

    For all of you who program on Songbird but want to keep the linux love going…

    http://getnightingale.org

  573. murray Apr 6, 2010 10:51 am Permalink

    I feel if the Songbird Team truly had placed open source software as a priority above revenue, this ideological shift wouldn’t have occurred–which is what this is really about. The development of Linux and other GNU-licensed software might be FUELED by capital, but not MOTIVATED by it. Unfortunately, what we have here is yet another illustration of weak individuals giving Capitalism the go-ahead to kick ethics and moral standard out of the driver’s seat. Only God knows why I’ve put up with these horrendous loading times for so long.

  574. malzfreund Apr 6, 2010 11:08 am Permalink

    ali wrote:
    “Sure, 10.9% of our users are on Linux, but it requires two completely distinct builds to get there! We have nearly the same amount of users on Mac with just one build (or, to put it another way, with just half the build/QA/release effort).”

    Two *completely* distinct builds? It takes *twice* the effort to support both x86 and x86-64 as opposed to just supporting x86? Either that’s a flat-out lie, or you’re doing it wrong!!

  575. fred Apr 6, 2010 11:16 am Permalink
  576. Gryphon Apr 6, 2010 11:20 am Permalink

    I understand the economics of the decision.

    I don’t agree with it. I believe it is a false economy.

    Good luck.

  577. David Apr 6, 2010 11:26 am Permalink

    Hmm. sad. I really think you should drop the other two, whos users have so many options, and devote development to linux. And why drop linux but keep the Macs?

    Oh well good luck. You’ll need it.

  578. nemo Apr 6, 2010 11:37 am Permalink

    I’m also extremely puzzled at the 10.9% figure – and it *is* a shame since I made a point of setting up and recommending Songbird when doing dual boots precisely because there were both linux and windows versions.

    I suppose I can recommend Winamp/Audacious combo now.

    With regards to the baffling comment about it taking twice as much effort to do both x86 and 64 bit builds, while I don’t pretend to understand how that could really be much effort to speak of, how about just maintaining a 32 bit version?

    Not quite as optimal as having both but most 64 bit Linux distros include 32 bit executable support and the necessary libraries to run ‘em. I’ve accidentally downloaded and run 32 bit firefox off of http://ftp.mozilla.org a couple of times.

    Also interested in the “one build for OSX” thing – even if you are doing a universal app, you are probably still doing both 32 bit and 64 bit builds inside that app file. So either you are not supporting 32 bit OSX either, or else you are doing 2 builds for OSX too.

    The 64 bit issue also applies to Windows, but I guess you aren’t supporting 64 bit there either.

  579. brett Apr 6, 2010 11:49 am Permalink

    this is a bad decision. windows has a ton music apps already and mac has itunes. linux doesn’t really have a front runner for a music app. songbird could have been it though.

  580. razordelight Apr 6, 2010 12:32 pm Permalink

    i am a linux veteran and i really must say, i can understand your decision, i am disappointed but i can live with it :)

    i really was excited in songbird project from day 1. anyway my interest was lost when you headed for video support/playback and not speedup. i wanted a fast itunes alternative with importance on watchfolders, organize filesnfolders, library, speed, ui, shop-engine and sync. what i did not want/need was videoplayback and webbrowsing. i mean hey, lets implement facebook / twitter support and you got a video-audio-social-shop-browserplayer. even a shaved chimp understand that this is bullsh… . fullhd vids in sb, lol… i even dont think about it ;)

    speed has always been a negative point in SB. it felt always bloated and laggy. hmm so i waited (have more important stuff to code, sorry) and followed your way.

    so long sb, i think you could become one of the best >>music<< player suite but not with browsing and videoplayback and so i have to say good bye :) it was an exciting time following your steps but our ways have split some time ago and now have lost.

    but anyway good luck, nice team :)

  581. chris Apr 6, 2010 12:40 pm Permalink

    I am part of those 10.9%… and used Songbird since the first versions running in Linux AMD64.

    I was happy with every new release because you could see major improvements and for me the functionality was sufficient

    I will also be part of those of ban Songbird from their hard drives… it is a pitty, however: http://getnightingale.org

  582. camaron Apr 6, 2010 12:43 pm Permalink

    You responded to the avalanche of comments in a funny way: thanking those (the very few) who understand the decision, denying some unfunded accusations (Phillips and the rest..) and half-clarifying some numbers. But you’ve left out all the main points:
    -You haven’t dropped Linux support, you have stopped being cross-platform, or the “Firefox of music players”
    -Why you didn’t ask for support from the Linux community or shared your concerns before the final decision was taken.
    -On what account it is more important to dedicate resources to things like video playing than to keep it cross-platform.

    It seems to me -by the look of it- that
    a- the final decision comes about as a result of much calculation on how to advance your business. It is literally your business not mine. You may or may not have the calculations right but something seems evident: the disappointment and the needs of a lot of people that were so excited about your project didn’t have much weight on either side of the balance.
    b-I don’t doubt for a second that this decision has cost grief (and possibly some bitterness) to SOME of you guys, mainly those that strongly argued against dropping support. Unfortunately they were either the minority or not in the right managerial positions.
    I am not one of those who are going to stop using Songbird out of spite. I don’t use Songbird on different platforms because I only use Linux. Songbird does exactly what I want from a music player/library organizer in the way I like. No other player comes remotely close to catering for my needs in such a way, in spite of all the well know resource and other issues (at least not in Linux). I don’t personally care about video playing, ipods and the rest of it. I’m just hoping that I can keep using some form of usable Songbird in the future. Whether it is that Linux version you say (in such vague terms) you are going to keep, or is some kind of fork (Lyrebird, etc) I don’t care much.
    I hope you do the unlikely and backtrack your decision.
    I see you soon

  583. jsgosselin Apr 6, 2010 1:14 pm Permalink

    Well, this is it. I was using Songbird mostly because of the cross-platform capability. Now, I will switch back to Amarok in Linux and Winamp in Windows.

    Thanks for the effort and good luck in windows. I think you will need it. I can’t see why someone would use Songbird in windows over all the other great players now that it’s not cross-platform…

  584. Nick Elliott Apr 6, 2010 1:46 pm Permalink

    I’ll admit to being slightly disappointed as I’d only recently started using Songbird on a regular basis and it showed a lot of potential.

    Fortunately there are decent alternatives for Linux, still it’s sad to see one less competitor.

  585. G Apr 6, 2010 1:46 pm Permalink

    How exactly does having a Linux build make Songbird money?

    Does it cost more money to support Linux than it makes the customer?

    If Linux users don’t make them money, and they cost more to support… why would Songbird bother?

  586. ben Apr 6, 2010 2:05 pm Permalink

    i’m a heavy linux64 songbird user and i can’t understand the decision where 0.1% made the difference between mac and linux!

    imagine how pretty the new songbird default feathers would look in the new ubuntu 10.04 design :(

  587. fraggle Apr 6, 2010 2:33 pm Permalink

    why not drop the mac version than instead of linux?

  588. vistakiller Apr 6, 2010 2:54 pm Permalink

    We have news. Community has act…

    http://getnightingale.org/

  589. former_songbird_user Apr 6, 2010 3:00 pm Permalink

    The most attractive aspects of Songbird were its open source nature, tri-platform support, and its iPod plugin. Sadly, two of these options are now gone.

    I’ve already abandoned Songbird on Windows in favor of a proprietary (but freeware) application. Looks like I’ll have to find a replacement on Linux. Too bad I won’t be able to run the same application across platforms. My only hope is that a cross-platform fork emerges.

    btw – the Mac version won’t be dumped because POTI will be pushing to have SB bundled with media players. Having a Mac version gives users of the other commercial/consumer OS an option when purchasing a non-iPod player.