<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equalizer = Pony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/</link>
	<description>Play music. Play the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ingilizce çeviri</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-61310</link>
		<dc:creator>ingilizce çeviri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-61310</guid>
		<description>Great work. Thanks to everyone who made this pony possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work. Thanks to everyone who made this pony possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55364</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55364</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been waiting so long for one improvement, thank you for the equalizer!

It really makes a big difference..

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting so long for one improvement, thank you for the equalizer!</p>
<p>It really makes a big difference..</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55289</guid>
		<description>Media Flow needs to catch up.  It&#039;s not working very well with 1.2... has issues with writing to the managed directory.  Otherwise, great build!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media Flow needs to catch up.  It&#8217;s not working very well with 1.2&#8230; has issues with writing to the managed directory.  Otherwise, great build!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird 1.2 ya vuela, más rápido que nunca&#160;&#124;&#160;Widcket</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55248</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird 1.2 ya vuela, más rápido que nunca&#160;&#124;&#160;Widcket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55248</guid>
		<description>[...] de 10 bandas Por fin, la fiel comunidad de usuarios de Songbird obtuvo el &#8220;pony&#8221; que tanto habían estado pidiendo desde 2006. Pero, los devs decidieron no incluir el set de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de 10 bandas Por fin, la fiel comunidad de usuarios de Songbird obtuvo el &#8220;pony&#8221; que tanto habían estado pidiendo desde 2006. Pero, los devs decidieron no incluir el set de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: +peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55149</link>
		<dc:creator>+peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55149</guid>
		<description>Okay, that&#039;s it! The equalizer was what held me from using Songbird full time.

Now that barrier is down... I am officially a Songbird user.
What&#039;s iTunes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that&#8217;s it! The equalizer was what held me from using Songbird full time.</p>
<p>Now that barrier is down&#8230; I am officially a Songbird user.<br />
What&#8217;s iTunes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiepmad</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55137</link>
		<dc:creator>kiepmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55137</guid>
		<description>What do you need an equalizer for, I have one in my stereo. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you need an equalizer for, I have one in my stereo. <img src='http://blog.songbirdnest.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55111</link>
		<dc:creator>James Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55111</guid>
		<description>Wow... soooo awesome....
It ooonly took 3 years to implement an equalizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; soooo awesome&#8230;.<br />
It ooonly took 3 years to implement an equalizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed, Brazil</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55028</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed, Brazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55028</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Lueke, 

It seems to me, after a couple of years as an Apple customer, that the real reason for all the loyal following (meaning: becoming fanboys) is to excuse ourselves for paying twice the price for products (including software, shareware or not) and having a much less-than-stellar feedback, either from the product itself or the service assciated to them. Why is it that only Apple can open, or disassemble, a product they design? After the purchase, the product is MINE, and if I want to ruin it using another brand memory chips, well, that&#039;s MY business.

Yes, design only, because everything is made or assembled in China.
Mac OS X? A rip-off of FreeBSD with a, well, nice appearance; it is NOT virus-free as much as any of the 120+ &#039;flavours&#039; of Linuxes out there. So, what is the REAL pieces of ORIGINAL software did Cupertino to better our miserable lives? iTunes? You got to be kidding.

All in all, I am very disappointed for having to pay such scorching prices and waiting for MONTHS for a hardware piece replaced.
And when all around the PC business (and yes Apple, you ARE a PC maker. At least a designer) prices are getting down and down, and Cupertino decides they want MORE $$$ for the 95% same hardware. Just check the price list for the &#039;new&#039; macbooks. 

Oh well, and what about all the aluminum c..p? Just another reason to spend $$$ purchasing protecting sh.. for the finicky products. And the glossy screens?? Where are we, 1995??

Yes, I am one of the victims of the well-polished merchandising machine; but when this thing I am using now to type dies, it will be for good. No more $$$ down the drain. And yes, I can assemble a PC better than you, Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Lueke, </p>
<p>It seems to me, after a couple of years as an Apple customer, that the real reason for all the loyal following (meaning: becoming fanboys) is to excuse ourselves for paying twice the price for products (including software, shareware or not) and having a much less-than-stellar feedback, either from the product itself or the service assciated to them. Why is it that only Apple can open, or disassemble, a product they design? After the purchase, the product is MINE, and if I want to ruin it using another brand memory chips, well, that&#8217;s MY business.</p>
<p>Yes, design only, because everything is made or assembled in China.<br />
Mac OS X? A rip-off of FreeBSD with a, well, nice appearance; it is NOT virus-free as much as any of the 120+ &#8216;flavours&#8217; of Linuxes out there. So, what is the REAL pieces of ORIGINAL software did Cupertino to better our miserable lives? iTunes? You got to be kidding.</p>
<p>All in all, I am very disappointed for having to pay such scorching prices and waiting for MONTHS for a hardware piece replaced.<br />
And when all around the PC business (and yes Apple, you ARE a PC maker. At least a designer) prices are getting down and down, and Cupertino decides they want MORE $$$ for the 95% same hardware. Just check the price list for the &#8216;new&#8217; macbooks. </p>
<p>Oh well, and what about all the aluminum c..p? Just another reason to spend $$$ purchasing protecting sh.. for the finicky products. And the glossy screens?? Where are we, 1995??</p>
<p>Yes, I am one of the victims of the well-polished merchandising machine; but when this thing I am using now to type dies, it will be for good. No more $$$ down the drain. And yes, I can assemble a PC better than you, Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Luecke</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-55017</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Luecke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-55017</guid>
		<description>@Larry.. Funny you mention that. I sent so many serious bug reports off to Apple, and the best response anyone ever gets is none, or a completely weak response (that none of us can legally disclose, but lets say they seemed automated and were consistantly useless). Apple didn&#039;t even bother checking the bugs obviously, and all feedback was mostly generic. Even to developers like me who paid excessive amounts per year to become one. 

Whereas, with Songbird, I have plenty of bugs/features I submitted to Bugzilla. Many get fixed within a few weeks, and every single one seems to get properly reviewed. And, Songbird is free/open source :D

So I can honestly say that songbird has some of the best developers and staff around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Larry.. Funny you mention that. I sent so many serious bug reports off to Apple, and the best response anyone ever gets is none, or a completely weak response (that none of us can legally disclose, but lets say they seemed automated and were consistantly useless). Apple didn&#8217;t even bother checking the bugs obviously, and all feedback was mostly generic. Even to developers like me who paid excessive amounts per year to become one. </p>
<p>Whereas, with Songbird, I have plenty of bugs/features I submitted to Bugzilla. Many get fixed within a few weeks, and every single one seems to get properly reviewed. And, Songbird is free/open source <img src='http://blog.songbirdnest.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So I can honestly say that songbird has some of the best developers and staff around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed, Brazil</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/06/12/equalizer-pony/comment-page-1/#comment-54988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed, Brazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1400#comment-54988</guid>
		<description>1.2 got extreeeemely slow when I opened it with Media Flow viewer enabled. It is taking about 10 minutes to check a 18,000 song library. I don&#039;t use Media Flow much, but I think something went south in this build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.2 got extreeeemely slow when I opened it with Media Flow viewer enabled. It is taking about 10 minutes to check a 18,000 song library. I don&#8217;t use Media Flow much, but I think something went south in this build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

