<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.1 Memory Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/</link>
	<description>Play music. Play the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gögüs estetiği</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-58797</link>
		<dc:creator>gögüs estetiği</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-58797</guid>
		<description>In 1.1 a whole heap of stuff was rewritten, and a side effect was that now only songbird freezes up, and eats up 1 CPU core (so the system is still totally usable). So obviously the changes brought about much better and safer code, even during crashes..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1.1 a whole heap of stuff was rewritten, and a side effect was that now only songbird freezes up, and eats up 1 CPU core (so the system is still totally usable). So obviously the changes brought about much better and safer code, even during crashes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laser Welding Machin</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-50909</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser Welding Machin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-50909</guid>
		<description>Totally awsome with the improved memoryusage! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally awsome with the improved memoryusage! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtrty</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-50908</link>
		<dc:creator>rtrty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-50908</guid>
		<description>we have bad news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have bad news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Música para os ouvidos (parte III) &#171;</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-49090</link>
		<dc:creator>Música para os ouvidos (parte III) &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-49090</guid>
		<description>[...] há nada nele  que o songbird (software livre com código aberto) não faça melhor usando menos memória. A Microsoft é um verdadeiro lixo, desde o começo de sua empreitada na internet, criando o [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] há nada nele  que o songbird (software livre com código aberto) não faça melhor usando menos memória. A Microsoft é um verdadeiro lixo, desde o começo de sua empreitada na internet, criando o [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-48075</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-48075</guid>
		<description>Love the songbird update...so much less cpu usage.

I would have to say that the best music player in terms of memory usage is musikcube. It&#039;s very basic though, and doesn&#039;t hold a candle to songbirds functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the songbird update&#8230;so much less cpu usage.</p>
<p>I would have to say that the best music player in terms of memory usage is musikcube. It&#8217;s very basic though, and doesn&#8217;t hold a candle to songbirds functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik ch</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-47078</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-47078</guid>
		<description>we have bad news...
Itunes has launch 8.1 of thir jukebox
and can be more features, like low memory use. I saw on this news
http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/performance-gai.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have bad news&#8230;<br />
Itunes has launch 8.1 of thir jukebox<br />
and can be more features, like low memory use. I saw on this news<br />
<a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/performance-gai.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/03/performance-gai.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird 1.1 ตัวเต็มออกแล้ว &#124; Pantip Guide</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-46863</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird 1.1 ตัวเต็มออกแล้ว &#124; Pantip Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-46863</guid>
		<description>[...] เช่น ลดการใช้หน่วยความจำ (ดูเพิ่มเติม), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] เช่น ลดการใช้หน่วยความจำ (ดูเพิ่มเติม), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird 1.1 ตัวเต็มออกแล้ว</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-46821</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird 1.1 ตัวเต็มออกแล้ว</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-46821</guid>
		<description>[...] เช่น ลดการใช้หน่วยความจำ (ดูเพิ่มเติม), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] เช่น ลดการใช้หน่วยความจำ (ดูเพิ่มเติม), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird 1.1 Installer Is Here &#171; The Unter Hund Blog - Technology Reviews, How-To&#8217;s, Downloads, and Information</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-46812</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird 1.1 Installer Is Here &#171; The Unter Hund Blog - Technology Reviews, How-To&#8217;s, Downloads, and Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-46812</guid>
		<description>[...] made some substantial gains this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made some substantial gains this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SongBird, the Firefox of Media Players &#124; Solidwebs.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2009/03/02/11-memory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-46745</link>
		<dc:creator>SongBird, the Firefox of Media Players &#124; Solidwebs.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=1040#comment-46745</guid>
		<description>[...] on long playbacks by half! but that doesnt mean it is the fastest, on thier own blog, they posted a comparison between: Songbird, winamp, itunes and WMP, you would be surprised to know WMP had the lowest memory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on long playbacks by half! but that doesnt mean it is the fastest, on thier own blog, they posted a comparison between: Songbird, winamp, itunes and WMP, you would be surprised to know WMP had the lowest memory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
