Comments on: Performance Improvements for 1.0 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/ Play music. Play the Web. Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:40:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Songbird 1.0 : l’alternative opensource à iTunes est dans les bacs « Delisigns http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-53340 Songbird 1.0 : l’alternative opensource à iTunes est dans les bacs « Delisigns Mon, 18 May 2009 17:48:57 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-53340 [...] Jusque-là, je n’avais jamais vraiment utilisé Songbird : trop lourd, interface pas très agréable. Bref, je ne lui ai pas vraiment laissé sa chance. Mais cette nouvelle version est d’un tout autre niveau. La nouvelle interface est de loin plus soignée, parfaitement intégrée à l’interface graphique MacOS et surtout, l’équipe de Songbird a énormément travaillé sur les performances. [...] [...] Jusque-là, je n’avais jamais vraiment utilisé Songbird : trop lourd, interface pas très agréable. Bref, je ne lui ai pas vraiment laissé sa chance. Mais cette nouvelle version est d’un tout autre niveau. La nouvelle interface est de loin plus soignée, parfaitement intégrée à l’interface graphique MacOS et surtout, l’équipe de Songbird a énormément travaillé sur les performances. [...]

]]> By: Songbird 1.0 « 蘆間賢話 Xian’s Blog http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-41739 Songbird 1.0 « 蘆間賢話 Xian’s Blog Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:39:21 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-41739 [...] 也許畢竟功能龐大，還是滿吃記憶體的。雖然 v1.0 比起舊版，能感覺出整體效能有明顯地提昇（Performance Improvements for 1.0），不過這對於沒用過舊版的人來說，沒什麼感覺吧… [...] [...] 也許畢竟功能龐大，還是滿吃記憶體的。雖然 v1.0 比起舊版，能感覺出整體效能有明顯地提昇（Performance Improvements for 1.0），不過這對於沒用過舊版的人來說，沒什麼感覺吧… [...]

]]> By: Songbird « 二師兄的筆記部落格 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-41633 Songbird « 二師兄的筆記部落格 Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:25:56 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-41633 [...] 也許畢竟功能龐大，還是滿吃記憶體的。雖然 v1.0 比起舊版，能感覺出整體效能有明顯地提昇（Performance Improvements for 1.0），不過這對於沒用過舊版的人來說，沒什麼感覺吧… [...] [...] 也許畢竟功能龐大，還是滿吃記憶體的。雖然 v1.0 比起舊版，能感覺出整體效能有明顯地提昇（Performance Improvements for 1.0），不過這對於沒用過舊版的人來說，沒什麼感覺吧… [...]

]]> By: Songbird 1.0 a review « Whitenoise http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-39972 Songbird 1.0 a review « Whitenoise Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:52:08 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-39972 [...] most of them. The application starts with a 3 column library view.The indexing of songs was pretty fast. My 12G song library got indexed within 3 minutes!  Songbird1.0 uses GStreamer,a cross platform  [...] [...] most of them. The application starts with a 3 column library view.The indexing of songs was pretty fast. My 12G song library got indexed within 3 minutes!  Songbird1.0 uses GStreamer,a cross platform  [...]

]]> By: Suopey http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-39373 Suopey Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:23:13 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-39373 I don't know if this was mentioned because I'm lazy, but could you guys focus on a toolbar mini player for when I'm working on another document If anyone thinks they can make an add on for a min toolbar player please do I don’t know if this was mentioned because I’m lazy, but could you guys focus on a toolbar mini player for when I’m working on another document

If anyone thinks they can make an add on for a min toolbar player please do

]]> By: Amarok Vs songbird | The Unexplored Blogging world http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-39154 Amarok Vs songbird | The Unexplored Blogging world Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:23:05 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-39154 [...] so is the cover flow.Its the biggest drawback of Songbird.This is expected to be resolved in future(check for updates)Whereas amarok never has any such [...] [...] so is the cover flow.Its the biggest drawback of Songbird.This is expected to be resolved in future(check for updates)Whereas amarok never has any such [...]

]]> By: Ju2999 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-39090 Ju2999 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:25:19 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-39090 Songbird 1.0 is so unbelievable slow on my iMac core2duo 2,8. Please optimize this software, especially the gui speed. I thought iTunes is slow, now Songbird is even slower! Songbird 1.0 is so unbelievable slow on my iMac core2duo 2,8. Please optimize this software, especially the gui speed. I thought iTunes is slow, now Songbird is even slower!

]]> By: Jordan http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-39033 Jordan Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:19:03 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-39033 I'm so happy performance is a priority. The idea of iTunes+firefox in a single sprawling executable often worries me.... I’m so happy performance is a priority. The idea of iTunes+firefox in a single sprawling executable often worries me….

]]> By: Djrocks http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-38943 Djrocks Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:36:04 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-38943 I notice a huge improvement on the Linux version, it now runs smooth as water. I love it. I notice a huge improvement on the Linux version, it now runs smooth as water. I love it.

]]> By: deOmega http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/26/performance-improvements-for-10/comment-page-1/#comment-38798 deOmega Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:08:00 +0000 http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=690#comment-38798 @mat Thank you for your feedback, and I must say that now I have a thorough understanding of what the problem is all about, I hope it is possible for you guys to implement that 100 limit per folder... sooner, than later.., seeing that all my songs are in a single folder. many thanks... @mat
Thank you for your feedback, and I must say that now I have a thorough understanding of what the problem is all about, I hope it is possible for you guys to implement that 100 limit per folder… sooner, than later.., seeing that all my songs are in a single folder. many thanks…

]]>