<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return of the RIA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/05/06/return-of-the-ria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/05/06/return-of-the-ria/</link>
	<description>Play music. Play the Web.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: roblord</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/05/06/return-of-the-ria/#comment-9142</link>
		<dc:creator>roblord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=372#comment-9142</guid>
		<description>@Forest: Go InstantBird!

@Richard and notme:
I believe you two just underscored the reason Mark thinks the term "web application" is more suitable/apropos. Mark assumes, correctly IMHO, that there's only marginal difference between the user utility an app developer/web publisher may author inside versus outside the browser canvas rectangle. 

My point is that an *Internet* application, specifically an RIA, pre-supposes an open client server-system, disaggregating client development and innovation from server development an innovation. Client and server need agree only the client-server methods, formats and protocols. This architectural disaggregation is, of course, the heart of the Web's success. So then, RIA-ness is measured by its Internet-ness, its open client-server architecture.

No offense to non-Internet-y apps yo! You're just not RIAs like Hillary isn't Obama.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Forest: Go InstantBird!</p>
<p>@Richard and notme:<br />
I believe you two just underscored the reason Mark thinks the term &#8220;web application&#8221; is more suitable/apropos. Mark assumes, correctly IMHO, that there&#8217;s only marginal difference between the user utility an app developer/web publisher may author inside versus outside the browser canvas rectangle. </p>
<p>My point is that an *Internet* application, specifically an RIA, pre-supposes an open client server-system, disaggregating client development and innovation from server development an innovation. Client and server need agree only the client-server methods, formats and protocols. This architectural disaggregation is, of course, the heart of the Web&#8217;s success. So then, RIA-ness is measured by its Internet-ness, its open client-server architecture.</p>
<p>No offense to non-Internet-y apps yo! You&#8217;re just not RIAs like Hillary isn&#8217;t Obama.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notme</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/05/06/return-of-the-ria/#comment-9131</link>
		<dc:creator>notme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=372#comment-9131</guid>
		<description>"You just can’t do those things inside the browser."
Oh yes, every thing you described can be done in a browser ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You just can’t do those things inside the browser.&#8221;<br />
Oh yes, every thing you described can be done in a browser <img src='http://blog.songbirdnest.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Crowley</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/05/06/return-of-the-ria/#comment-9105</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=372#comment-9105</guid>
		<description>To me RIA has always meant a real native installed application that was used to interact with the Internet.  The realm of RIAs is that which is outside the capabilities of the web browser.  The bastardization of the term started with its use to describe any website that danced a little bit.  Firefox is certainly the one we all reach towards but Songbird, the Flickr Uploadr (yep, shameless plug), every IM client - these are what RIA really means.  You just can't do those things inside the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me RIA has always meant a real native installed application that was used to interact with the Internet.  The realm of RIAs is that which is outside the capabilities of the web browser.  The bastardization of the term started with its use to describe any website that danced a little bit.  Firefox is certainly the one we all reach towards but Songbird, the Flickr Uploadr (yep, shameless plug), every IM client - these are what RIA really means.  You just can&#8217;t do those things inside the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forest</title>
		<link>http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/05/06/return-of-the-ria/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator>forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.songbirdnest.com/?p=372#comment-9097</guid>
		<description>It seems like you could write a &lt;a href="http://www.instantbird.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;InstantBird&lt;/a&gt; plugin to do what you are talking about with Twitter??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like you could write a <a href="http://www.instantbird.com/" rel="nofollow">InstantBird</a> plugin to do what you are talking about with Twitter??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
